Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 41 - 60 of 75
Results per page:
The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 101-B, Issue 8 | Pages 995 - 1001
1 Aug 2019
Nicholson JA Clement N Goudie E Robinson CM

Aims

The primary aim of this study was to establish the cost-effectiveness of the early fixation of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures.

Patients and Methods

A cost analysis was conducted within a randomized controlled trial comparing conservative management (n = 92) versus early plate fixation (n = 86) of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was used to express the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). The Six-Dimension Short-Form Health Survey (SF-6D) score was used as the preference-based health index to calculate the cost per QALY at 12 months after the injury.


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 6, Issue 4 | Pages 31 - 34
1 Aug 2017


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 6, Issue 2 | Pages 28 - 30
1 Apr 2017


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 6, Issue 6 | Pages 25 - 28
1 Dec 2017


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 6, Issue 5 | Pages 33 - 35
1 Oct 2017


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 7, Issue 2 | Pages 23 - 25
1 Apr 2018


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 5, Issue 6 | Pages 27 - 29
1 Dec 2016


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 6, Issue 4 | Pages 25 - 29
1 Aug 2017


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 6, Issue 3 | Pages 38 - 39
1 Jun 2017
Das A


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 7, Issue 6 | Pages 26 - 28
1 Dec 2018


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 6, Issue 4 | Pages 20 - 22
1 Aug 2017


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 6, Issue 10 | Pages 610 - 611
1 Oct 2017
Simpson AHRW


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 5, Issue 1 | Pages 2 - 8
1 Feb 2016
Bryson D Shivji F Price K Lawniczak D Chell J Hunter J


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 6, Issue 5 | Pages 21 - 24
1 Oct 2017


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 4, Issue 5 | Pages 32 - 33
1 Oct 2015
Das A


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 98-B, Issue 8 | Pages 1074 - 1079
1 Aug 2016
Königshausen M Coulibaly MO Nicolas V Schildhauer TA Seybold D

Aims

Our aim was to investigate the outcomes of patients with a displaced fracture of the glenoid fossa who are treated conservatively. There is little information in the literature about the treatment of these rare injuries non-operatively.

Patients and Methods

We reviewed 24 patients with a mean age of 52 years (19 to 81) at a mean of 5.6 years (11 months to 18 years) after the injury.


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 3, Issue 4 | Pages 35 - 38
1 Aug 2014
Hammerberg EM


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 5, Issue 1 | Pages 26 - 28
1 Feb 2016


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 98-B, Issue 4 | Pages 512 - 518
1 Apr 2016
Spencer HT Hsu L Sodl J Arianjam A Yian EH

Aims

To compare radiographic failure and re-operation rates of anatomical coracoclavicular (CC) ligament reconstructional techniques with non-anatomical techniques after chronic high grade acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries.

Patients and Methods

We reviewed chronic AC joint reconstructions within a region-wide healthcare system to identify surgical technique, complications, radiographic failure and re-operations. Procedures fell into four categories: (1) modified Weaver-Dunn, (2) allograft fixed through coracoid and clavicular tunnels, (3) allograft loop coracoclavicular fixation, and (4) combined allograft loop and synthetic cortical button fixation. Among 167 patients (mean age 38.1 years, (standard deviation (sd) 14.7) treated at least a four week interval after injury, 154 had post-operative radiographs available for analysis.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 97-B, Issue 11 | Pages 1562 - 1565
1 Nov 2015
Ersen A Atalar AC Birisik F Saglam Y Demirhan M

Only a few randomised, controlled studies have compared different non-operative methods of treatment of mid-shaft fractures of the clavicle.

In this prospective, randomised controlled study of 60 participants (mean age 31.6 years; 15 to 75) we compared the broad arm sling with the figure of eight bandage for the treatment of mid-shaft clavicle fractures. Our outcome measures were pain, Constant and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores and radiological union.

The mean visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score on the first day after treatment was significantly higher (VAS 1 6.8; 4 to 9) in the figure of eight bandage group than the broad arm sling group (VAS 1 5.6; 3 to 8, p = 0.034). A mean shortening of 9 mm (3 to 17) was measured in the figure of eight bandage group, versus 7.5 mm (0 to 24) in the broad arm sling group (p = 0.30).

The application of the figure of eight bandage is more difficult than of the broad arm sling, and patients experience more pain during the first day when treated with this option. We suggest the broad arm sling is preferable because of the reduction of early pain and ease of application.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:1562–5.