We retrospectively studied 14 patients with proximal and diaphyseal tumours and disappearing bone (Gorham’s) disease of the humerus treated with wide resection and reconstruction using an allograft-resurfacing composite (ARC). There were ten women and four men, with a mean age of 35 years (8 to 69). At a mean follow-up of 25 months (10 to 89), two patients had a fracture of the allograft. In one of these it was revised with a similar ARC and in the other with an intercalary prosthesis. A further patient had an infection and a fracture of the allograft that was revised with a megaprosthesis. In all patients with an ARC, healing of the ARC-host bone interface was observed. One patient had failure of the locking mechanism of the total elbow replacement. The mean post-operative Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score for the upper extremity was 77% (46.7% to 86.7%), which represents good and excellent results; one patient had a poor result (46.7%). In the short term ARC effectively relieves pain and restores shoulder function in patients with wide resection of the proximal humerus. Fracture and infection remain significant complications.
The current indications for functional restoration
of extension of the knee following quadriceps resection or loss require
reappraisal. The contribution of pedicled and free functional muscle
transfer is likely to be over-emphasised in many studies, with good
functional outcomes predominantly reported only in the context of
cases with residual quadriceps function. In cases with total quadriceps
resection or loss, all forms of reconstruction perform poorly. Furthermore,
in smaller resections with loss of two or fewer components of the
quadriceps, minimal impairment of function occurs in the absence
of functional reconstruction, suggesting that functional restoration
may not be warranted. Thus there is a paradox in the current approach
to quadriceps reconstruction, in that small resections are likely
to be over-treated and large resections remain under-treated. This review suggests a shift is required in the approach and
rationale for reconstructing functional extension of the knee after
quadriceps resection or loss. A classification based on current
evidence is suggested that emphasises more clearly the indications
and rationale for functional transfers.
The best method of reconstruction after resection of malignant tumours of the tibial diaphysis is unknown. In the absence of any long-term studies analysing the results of intercalary endoprosthetic replacement, we present a retrospective review of 18 patients who underwent limb salvage using a tibial diaphyseal endoprosthetic replacement following excision of a malignant bone tumour. There were ten men and eight women with a mean age of 42.5 years (16 to 76). Mean follow-up was 58.5 months (20 to 141) for all patients and 69.3 months (20 to 141) for the 12 patients still alive. Cumulative patient survival was 59% (95% confidence interval (CI) 32 to 84) at five years. Implant survival was 63% (95% CI 35 to 90) at ten years. Four patients required revision to a proximal tibial replacement at a mean follow-up of 29 months (10 to 54). Complications included metastases in five patients, aseptic loosening in four, peri-prosthetic fracture in two, infection in one and local recurrence in one. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score and the mean Toronto Extremity Salvage Score were 23 (17 to 28) and 74% (53 to 91), respectively. Although rates of complication and revision were high, custom-made tibial diaphyseal replacement following resection of malignant bone tumours enables early return to function and provides an attractive alternative to other surgical options, without apparent compromise of patient survival.
Giant cell tumours (GCTs) of the small bones
of the hands and feet are rare. Small case series have been published but
there is no consensus about ideal treatment. We performed a systematic
review, initially screening 775 titles, and included 12 papers comprising
91 patients with GCT of the small bones of the hands and feet. The
rate of recurrence across these publications was found to be 72%
(18 of 25) in those treated with isolated curettage, 13% (2 of 15)
in those treated with curettage plus adjuvants, 15% (6 of 41) in
those treated by resection and 10% (1 of 10) in those treated by
amputation. We then retrospectively analysed 30 patients treated for GCT
of the small bones of the hands and feet between 1987 and 2010 in
five specialised centres. The primary treatment was curettage in
six, curettage with adjuvants (phenol or liquid nitrogen with or
without polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA)) in 18 and resection in six.
We evaluated the rate of complications and recurrence as well as
the factors that influenced their functional outcome. At a mean follow-up of 7.9 years (2 to 26) the rate of recurrence
was 50% (n = 3) in those patients treated with isolated curettage,
22% (n = 4) in those treated with curettage plus adjuvants and 17%
(n = 1) in those treated with resection (p = 0.404). The only complication
was pain in one patient, which resolved after surgical removal of remnants
of PMMA. We could not identify any individual factors associated
with a higher rate of complications or recurrence. The mean post-operative
Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scores were slightly higher after
intra-lesional treatment including isolated curettage and curettage
plus adjuvants (29 (20 to 30)) compared with resection (25 (15 to
30)) (p = 0.091). Repeated curettage with adjuvants eventually resulted
in the cure for all patients and is therefore a reasonable treatment
for both primary and recurrent GCT of the small bones of the hands
and feet. Cite this article:
