There is no absolute method of evaluating healing
of a fracture of the tibial shaft. In this study we sought to validate a
new clinical method based on the systematic observation of gait,
first by assessing the degree of agreement between three independent
observers regarding the gait score for a given patient, and secondly
by determining how such a score might predict healing of a fracture. We used a method of evaluating gait to assess 33 patients (29
men and four women, with a mean age of 29 years (15 to 62)) who
had sustained an isolated fracture of the tibial shaft and had been
treated with a locked intramedullary nail. There were 15 closed
and 18 open fractures (three Gustilo and Anderson grade I, seven
grade II, seven grade IIIA and one grade IIIB). Assessment was carried
out three and six months post-operatively using videos taken with
a digital camera. Gait was graded on a scale ranging from 1 (extreme
difficulty) to 4 (normal gait). Bivariate analysis included analysis
of variance to determine whether the gait score statistically correlated
with previously validated and standardised scores of clinical status
and radiological evidence of union. An association was found between the pattern of gait and all
the other variables. Improvement in gait was associated with the
absence of pain on weight-bearing, reduced tenderness over the fracture,
a higher Radiographic Union Scale in Tibial Fractures score, and
improved functional status, measured using the Brazilian version
of the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire (all
p <
0.001). Although further study is needed, the analysis of
gait in this way may prove to be a useful clinical tool.
Most animal studies indicate that early irrigation
and debridement reduce infection after an open fracture. Unfortunately,
these studies often do not involve antibiotics. Clinical studies
indicate that the timing of initial debridement does not affect
the rate of infection but these studies are observational and fraught
with confounding variables. The purpose of this study was to control
these variables using an animal model incorporating systemic antibiotics
and surgical treatment. We used a rat femur model with a defect which was contaminated
with No animal that received antibiotics and surgery two hours after
injury had detectable bacteria. When antibiotics were started at
two hours, a delay in surgical treatment from two to six hours significantly
increased the development of infection (p = 0.047). However, delaying
surgery to 24 hours increase the rate of infection, but not significantly
(p = 0.054). The timing of antibiotics had a more significant effect
on the proportion of positive samples than earlier surgery. Delaying
antibiotics to six or 24 hours had a profoundly detrimental effect
on the infection rate regardless of the timing of surgery. These
findings are consistent with the concept that bacteria progress
from a vulnerable planktonic form to a treatment-resistant biofilm.
Despite advances in reconstructive surgery, salvage of mangled extremities still requires long periods of treatment with many operations that can be taxing both to the surgeon and the patient. Attempts at reconstruction of severely shattered limbs necessitate counselling with regard to the protracted course of treatment and associated morbidity as well as problems which may require abandoning of the procedure and secondary amputation. We report the successful salvage of a severely comminuted and open fracture of the tibia in a 32-year-old man.
We reviewed 78 femoral and tibial nonunions treated between January 1992 and December 2003. Of these, we classified 41 in 40 patients as complex cases because of infection (22), bone loss (6) or failed previous surgery (13). The complex cases were all treated with Ilizarov frames. At a mean time of 14.1 months (4 to 38), 39 had healed successfully. Using the Association for the Study and Application of the Methods of Ilizarov scoring system we obtained 17 excellent, 14 good, four fair and six poor bone results. The functional results were excellent in 14 patients, good in 14, fair in two and poor in two. A total of six patients were lost to follow-up and two had amputations so were not evaluated for final functional assessment. All but two patients were very satisfied with the results. The average cost of treatment to the treating hospital was approximately £30 000 per patient. We suggest that early referral to a tertiary centre could reduce the morbidity and prolonged time off work for these patients. The results justify the expense, but the National Health Service needs to make financial provision for the reconstruction of this type of complex nonunion.