Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 481 - 500 of 8069
Results per page:
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 86-B, Issue 2 | Pages 159 - 164
1 Mar 2004
Vats A Tolley NS Buttery LDK Polak DJM



The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 89-B, Issue 2 | Pages 283 - 284
1 Feb 2007
Marshall R


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 87-B, Issue 2 | Pages 151 - 154
1 Feb 2005
Harvie P Pollard TCB Chennagiri RJ Carr AJ


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 87-B, Issue 9 | Pages 1178 - 1181
1 Sep 2005
Harrison WJ


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 88-B, Issue 7 | Pages 841 - 851
1 Jul 2006
Lee EH Hui JHP


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 84-B, Issue 7 | Pages 1036 - 1039
1 Sep 2002
Tai CC Want S Quraishi NA Batten J Kalra M Hughes SPF

Antibiotics are often administrated prophylactically in spinal procedures to reduce the risk of infection of the disc space. It is still not known which antibiotics are able to penetrate the intervertebral disc effectively. In a prospective, randomised, double-blind clinical study, we examined the penetration of the intervertebral discs of two commonly used antibiotics, cefuroxime and gentamicin. The patients, randomised into two groups, received either 1.5 g of cefuroxime or 5 mg/kg of gentamicin prophylactically two hours before their intervertebral discs were removed. A specimen of blood, from which serum antibiotic levels were determined, was obtained at the time of discectomy.

Therapeutic levels of antibiotic were detectable in the intervertebral discs of the ten patients who received gentamicin. Only two of the ten patients (20%) who received cefuroxime had a quantifiable level of antibiotic in their discs although therapeutic serum levels of cefuroxime were found in all ten patients. Our results show that cefuroxime does not diffuse into human intervertebral discs as readily as gentamicin. It is possible that the charge due to ionisable groups on the antibiotics can influence the penetration of the antibiotics. We therefore recommend the use of gentamicin in a single prophylactic dose for all spinal procedures in order to reduce the risk of discitis.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 84-B, Issue 5 | Pages 625 - 626
1 Jul 2002
Sher JL Galasko CSB


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 84-B, Issue 2 | Pages 310 - 310
1 Mar 2002
Smith M


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 84-B, Issue 1 | Pages 150 - 151
1 Jan 2002
Dickson R Limb D


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 83-B, Issue 8 | Pages 1211 - 1211
1 Nov 2001


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 88-B, Issue 6 | Pages 832 - 836
1 Jun 2006
Barker R Takahashi T Toms A Gregson P Kuiper JH

The use of impaction bone grafting during revision arthroplasty of the hip in the presence of cortical defects has a high risk of post-operative fracture. Our laboratory study addressed the effect of extramedullary augmentation and length of femoral stem on the initial stability of the prosthesis and the risk of fracture.

Cortical defects in plastic femora were repaired using either surgical mesh without extramedullary augmentation, mesh with a strut graft or mesh with a plate. After bone impaction, standard or long-stem Exeter prostheses were inserted, which were tested by cyclical loading while measuring defect strain and migration of the stem.

Compared with standard stems without extramedullary augmentation, defect strains were 31% lower with longer stems, 43% lower with a plate and 50% lower with a strut graft. Combining extramedullary augmentation with a long stem showed little additional benefit (p = 0.67). The type of repair did not affect the initial stability. Our results support the use of impaction bone grafting and extramedullary augmentation of diaphyseal defects after mesh containment.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 82-B, Issue 4 | Pages 622 - 622
1 May 2000
Compson JN


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 81-B, Issue 3 | Pages 558 - 558
1 May 1999
SHERRY E


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 81-B, Issue 1 | Pages 3 - 6
1 Jan 1999
Oliver CW


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 80-B, Issue 6 | Pages 1083 - 1083
1 Nov 1998
Briggs TWR


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 80-B, Issue 5 | Pages 937 - 937
1 Sep 1998
Scott G


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 80-B, Issue 5 | Pages 935 - 936
1 Sep 1998
Evans DM


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 93-B, Issue 4 | Pages 567 - 567
1 Apr 2011
Evans D


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 80-B, Issue 3 | Pages 560 - 560
1 May 1998
Craigen M