header advert
Results 401 - 420 of 4529
Results per page:
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 50-B, Issue 4 | Pages 701 - 707
1 Nov 1968
James JIP


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 50-B, Issue 3 | Pages 688 - 689
1 Aug 1968


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 50-B, Issue 2 | Pages 451 - 452
1 May 1968


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 50-B, Issue 1 | Pages 246 - 246
1 Feb 1968
Lacroix P


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 50-B, Issue 1 | Pages 246 - 246
1 Feb 1968


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 50-B, Issue 1 | Pages 246 - 246
1 Feb 1968
Bonnin JG


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 48-B, Issue 4 | Pages 703 - 728
1 Nov 1966
Griffiths DL


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 48-B, Issue 2 | Pages 320 - 332
1 May 1966
Golding C


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 46-B, Issue 4 | Pages 806 - 808
1 Nov 1964


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 46-B, Issue 3 | Pages 579 - 579
1 Aug 1964


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 46-B, Issue 2 | Pages 367 - 367
1 May 1964


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 46-B, Issue 1 | Pages 177 - 178
1 Feb 1964


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 45-B, Issue 4 | Pages 816 - 818
1 Nov 1963


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 45-B, Issue 1 | Pages 237 - 237
1 Feb 1963


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 45-B, Issue 2 | Pages 442 - 443
1 May 1963


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 45-B, Issue 3 | Pages 634 - 635
1 Aug 1963


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 44-B, Issue 4 | Pages 759 - 760
1 Nov 1962
Capener N


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 44-B, Issue 4 | Pages 973 - 974
1 Nov 1962

We acknowledge with thanks receipt of:

Acta Chirurgica Scandinavica, and Supplements

Acta Orthopaedica Italica

Acta Ortopedica-Traumatologica Iberica

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England

Archives of Surgery

Archivio dei Centri Traumatologici Ortopedici dell'Istituto Nazionale lnfortuni

Biological Abstracts

Boletin de la Sociedad de Cirugia del Uruguay

British Journal of Surgery

British Medical Bulletin

Canadian Journal of Surgery

Indian Journal of Surgery

Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry

Journal of the American Medical Association

Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh

Lancet

Ortopedia e Traumatologia dell'Apparato Motore

Radiology

Revista de Ortopedia y Traumatologia

Revue de Chirurgie Orthopédique

Surgery, Gynecology and Obstetrics

Zeitschrift für Orthopädie und ihre Grenzgebiete


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 44-B, Issue 3 | Pages 757 - 757
1 Aug 1962


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 41-B, Issue 4 | Pages 810 - 820
1 Nov 1959
Scales JT Winter GD Shirley HT

1. A total of 564 metal components from 109 patients have been examined.

2. Corrosion was detected on 228 components.

3. Most implants were removed for reasons other than corrosion.

4. In at least twelve cases corrosion was the reason for removal of the implant.

5. No corrosion of cobalt-chromium-molybdenum implants has been detected by the methods described in this paper.

6. Corrosion of ferrous alloy implants occurs in the human body.

7. The most common site for corrosion is the junction between components of implants.

8. The most corrosion-resistant type of ferrous alloy for implant uses is 18/8/Mo steel, which falls within specification En58.J of the British Standards Institute, and specification 316/317 of the American Iron and Steel Institute.

9. About 13 per cent of components removed (and by no means only when something was amiss) showed "face" corrosion when all the components of the implant were made of 18/8/Mo steel.

10. Four per cent of 18/8/Mo components of implants showed corrosion at sites other than the interface between components.

11. On the basis of corrosion resistance it is preferable to use cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloys for implants that are to be left in the body for an indefinite period.

12. The corrosion resistance of the high alloy steels examined (18/8, 18/8/Ti, 18/8/Mo) does not appear to be related to hardness.

13. The marking of components, either by punching or by electrolytic methods, has not predisposed to corrosion.

14. All hollow 18/8/Mo implants should have a clean and metallurgically satisfactory internal surface.

15. The figures in this report do not permit a full statistical survey of corrosion in surgical implants because it has not been possible to examine a satisfactorily random sample. Many patients cannot be followed up and others die with the implant still in the body.