The routine use of dual-mobility (DM) acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty (THA) may not be cost-effective, but an increasing number of patients undergoing THA have a coexisting spinal disorder, which increases the risk of postoperative instability, and these patients may benefit from DM articulations. This study seeks to examine the cost-effectiveness of DM components as an alternative to standard articulations in these patients. A decision analysis model was used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of using DM components in patients who would be at high risk for dislocation within one year of THA. Direct and indirect costs of dislocation, incremental costs of using DM components, quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) values, and the probabilities of dislocation were derived from published data. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was established with a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000/QALY. Sensitivity analysis was used to examine the impact of variation.Aims
Patients and Methods
Lumbar fusion is known to reduce the variation in pelvic tilt
between standing and sitting. A flexible lumbo-pelvic unit increases
the stability of total hip arthroplasty (THA) when seated by increasing
anterior clearance and acetabular anteversion, thereby preventing
impingement of the prosthesis. Lumbar fusion may eliminate this protective
pelvic movement. The effect of lumbar fusion on the stability of
total hip arthroplasty has not previously been investigated. The Medicare database was searched for patients who had undergone
THA and spinal fusion between 2005 and 2012. PearlDiver software
was used to query the database by the International Classification
of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) procedural
code for primary THA and lumbar spinal fusion. Patients who had
undergone both lumbar fusion and THA were then divided into three
groups: 1 to 2 levels, 3 to 7 levels and 8+ levels of fusion. The
rate of dislocation in each group was established using ICD-9-CM codes.
Patients who underwent THA without spinal fusion were used as a
control group. Statistical significant difference between groups
was tested using the chi-squared test, and significance set at p
<
0.05.Aims
Patients and Methods
The interaction between the lumbosacral spine
and the pelvis is dynamically related to positional change, and
may be complicated by co-existing pathology. This review summarises
the current literature examining the effect of sagittal spinal deformity
on pelvic and acetabular orientation during total hip arthroplasty
(THA) and provides recommendations to aid in placement of the acetabular
component for patients with co-existing spinal pathology or long
spinal fusions. Pre-operatively, patients can be divided into four
categories based on the flexibility and sagittal balance of the
spine. Using this information as a guide, placement of the acetabular
component can be optimal based on the type and significance of co-existing
spinal deformity. Cite this article:
