Instability in flexion after total knee replacement
(TKR) typically occurs as a result of mismatched flexion and extension
gaps. The goals of this study were to identify factors leading to
instability in flexion, the degree of correction, determined radiologically,
required at revision surgery, and the subsequent clinical outcomes.
Between 2000 and 2010, 60 TKRs in 60 patients underwent revision
for instability in flexion associated with well-fixed components.
There were 33 women (55%) and 27 men (45%); their mean age was 65
years (43 to 82). Radiological measurements and the Knee Society
score (KSS) were used to assess outcome after revision surgery.
The mean follow-up was 3.6 years (2 to 9.8). Decreased condylar
offset (p <
0.001), distalisation of the joint line (p <
0.001)
and increased posterior tibial slope (p <
0.001) contributed
to instability in flexion and required correction at revision to regain
stability. The combined mean correction of posterior condylar offset
and joint line resection was 9.5 mm, and a mean of 5° of posterior
tibial slope was removed. At the most recent follow-up, there was
a significant improvement in the mean KSS for the knee and function
(both p <
0.001), no patient reported instability and no patient
underwent further surgery for instability. The following step-wise approach is recommended: reduction of
tibial slope, correction of malalignment, and improvement of condylar
offset. Additional joint line elevation is needed if the above steps
do not equalise the flexion and extension gaps. Cite this article:
We report the use of an allograft prosthetic composite for reconstruction of the skeletal defect in complex revision total hip replacement for severe proximal femoral bone loss. Between 1986 and 1999, 72 patients (20 men, 52 women) with a mean age of 59.9 years (38 to 78) underwent reconstruction using this technique. At a mean follow-up of 12 years (8 to 20) 57 patients were alive, 14 had died and one was lost to follow-up. Further revision was performed in 19 hips at a mean of 44.5 months (11 to 153) post-operatively. Causes of failure were aseptic loosening in four, allograft resorption in three, allograft nonunion in two, allograft fracture in four, fracture of the stem in one, and deep infection in five. The survivorship of the allograft-prosthesis composite at ten years was 69.0% (95% confidence interval 67.7 to 70.3) with 26 patients remaining at risk. Survivorship was statistically significantly affected by the severity of the pre-operative bone loss (Paprosky type IV; p = 0.019), the number of previous hip revisions exceeding two (p = 0.047), and the length of the allograft used (p = 0.005).
