Cementless femoral stems are currently preferred
for total hip replacement (THR) in the United States. Improvements
in stem design, instrumentation and surgical technique have made
this technology highly successful, reproducible, and applicable
to the vast majority of patients requiring a THR. However, there
are ongoing developments in some aspects of stem design that influence
clinical results, the incidence of complications and their inherent adaptability
in accommodating the needs of individual patients. Here we examine
some of these design features. Cite this article:
Patient specific cutting guides generated by
preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the patient’s extremity
have been proposed as a method of improving the consistency of Total
Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) alignment and adding efficiency to the operative
procedure. The cost of this option was evaluated by quantifying the
savings from decreased operative time and instrument processing
costs compared to the additional cost of the MRI and the guide.
Coronal plane alignment was measured in an unselected consecutive
series of 200 TKAs, 100 with standard instrumentation and 100 with
custom cutting guides. While the cutting guides had significantly lower
total operative time and instrument processing time, the estimated
$322 savings was overwhelmed by the $1,500 additional cost of the
MRI and the cutting guide. All measures of coronal plane alignment
were equivalent between the two groups. The data does not currently
support the proposition that patient specific guides add value to
TKA.
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains an immediate
threat to patients following total hip and knee replacement. While
there is a strong consensus that steps should be taken to minimise
the risk to patients by utilising some forms of prophylaxis for
the vast majority of patients, the methods utilised have been extremely
variable. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have been published
by various professional organisations for over 25 years to provide recommendations
to standardise VTE prophylaxis. Historically, these recommendations
have varied widely depending in underlying assumptions, goals, and
methodology of the various groups. This effort has previously been
exemplified by the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) and
the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS). The former
group of medical specialists targeted minimising venographically
proven deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (the vast majority of which are
asymptomatic) as their primary goal prior to 2012. The latter group of
surgeons targeted minimising symptomatic VTE. As a result prior
to 2012, the recommendations of the two groups were widely divergent.
In the past year, both groups have reassessed the current literature
with the principal goals of minimising symptomatic VTE events and
bleeding complications. As a result, for the first time the CPGs
of these two major subspecialty organisations are in close agreement.
Since 1996 more than one million metal-on-metal
articulations have been implanted worldwide. Adverse reactions to
metal debris are escalating. Here we present an algorithmic approach
to patient management. The general approach to all arthroplasty
patients returning for follow-up begins with a detailed history,
querying for pain, discomfort or compromise of function. Symptomatic
patients should be evaluated for intra-articular and extra-articular
causes of pain. In large head MoM arthroplasty, aseptic loosening
may be the source of pain and is frequently difficult to diagnose.
Sepsis should be ruled out as a source of pain. Plain radiographs
are evaluated to rule out loosening and osteolysis, and assess component
position. Laboratory evaluation commences with erythrocyte sedimentation
rate and C-reactive protein, which may be elevated. Serum metal
ions should be assessed by an approved facility. Aspiration, with
manual cell count and culture/sensitivity should be performed, with
cloudy to creamy fluid with predominance of monocytes often indicative
of failure. Imaging should include ultrasound or metal artifact
reduction sequence MRI, specifically evaluating for fluid collections
and/or masses about the hip. If adverse reaction to metal debris
is suspected then revision to metal or ceramic-on-polyethylene is indicated
and can be successful. Delay may be associated with extensive soft-tissue
damage and hence poor clinical outcome.
We reviewed 194 revision arthroplasties of the hip and knee performed over a ten-year period. The results of intraoperative Gram staining were available in 169 (87%). Thirty-two were found to be infected (11 hips and 21 knees) and 137 had no evidence of infection. Intraoperative Gram staining was negative in all 169 cases. The method therefore had a sensitivity of 0% for detecting infection. We conclude that the absence of organisms on intraoperative Gram staining during revision arthroplasty does not confirm the absence of infection.
