Primary (or spontaneous) and secondary osteonecrosis of the knee
can lead to severe joint degeneration, for which either total or
unicompartmental arthroplasty may be considered. However, there
are limited studies analyzing outcomes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasties
(UKAs) for osteonecrosis involving an isolated compartment of the
knee. The aims of this study were to analyze outcomes of UKAs for
osteonecrosis with specific focus on 1) survivorship free of any
revision or reoperation, 2) risk factors for failure, 3) clinical outcomes,
and 4) complications. A total of 45 patients underwent 46 UKAs for knee osteonecrosis
between 2002 and 2014 at our institution (The Mayo Clinic, Rochester,
Minnesota). Twenty patients (44%) were female; the mean age of the
patients was 66 years, and mean body mass index (BMI) was 31 kg/m2. Of
the 46 UKAs, 44 (96%) were medial UKAs, and 35 (76%) were fixed-bearing
design. Mean mechanical axis postoperatively was 1.5° varus (0°
to 5° varus); 41 UKAs (89%) were performed for primary osteonecrosis.
Mean follow-up was five years (2 to 12)Aims
Patients and Methods
The classical longitudinal incision used for the direct anterior
approach (DAA) to the hip does not follow the tension lines of the
skin and can lead to impaired wound healing and poor cosmesis. The
purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the satisfaction
with the scar, and functional and radiographic outcomes comparing
the classic longitudinal incision with a modified skin crease ‘bikini’
when the DAA is used for total hip arthroplasty (THA). A total of 964 patients (51% female; 59% longitudinal, 41% ‘bikini’)
completed a follow-up questionnaire between two and four years postoperatively,
including the Oxford Hip Score (OHS), the University of North Carolina
‘4P’ scar scale (UNC4P) and two items for assessing the aesthetic
appearance of the scar and symptoms of numbness. The positioning
of the components, rates of heterotopic ossification (HO) and rates
of revision were assessed.Aims
Patients and Methods
The diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is difficult and requires a battery of tests and clinical findings. The purpose of this review is to summarize all current evidence for common and new serum biomarkers utilized in the diagnosis of PJI. We searched two literature databases, using terms that encompass all hip and knee arthroplasty procedures, as well as PJI and statistical terms reflecting diagnostic parameters. The findings are summarized as a narrative review.Objectives
Methods
We report the kinematic and early clinical results
of a patient- and observer-blinded randomised controlled trial in which
CT scans were used to compare potential impingement-free range of
movement (ROM) and acetabular component cover between patients treated
with either the navigated ‘femur-first’ total hip arthroplasty (THA) method
(n = 66; male/female 29/37, mean age 62.5 years; 50 to 74) or conventional
THA (n = 69; male/female 35/34, mean age 62.9 years; 50 to 75).
The Hip Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, the Harris hip score, the
Euro-Qol-5D and the Mancuso THA patient expectations score were
assessed at six weeks, six months and one year after surgery. A
total of 48 of the patients (84%) in the navigated ‘femur-first’
group and 43 (65%) in the conventional group reached all the desirable
potential ROM boundaries without prosthetic impingement for activities
of daily living (ADL) in flexion, extension, abduction, adduction
and rotation (p = 0.016). Acetabular component cover and surface
contact with the host bone were >
87% in both groups. There was
a significant difference between the navigated and the conventional
groups’ Harris hip scores six weeks after surgery (p = 0.010). There
were no significant differences with respect to any clinical outcome
at six months and one year of follow-up. The navigated ‘femur-first’
technique improves the potential ROM for ADL without prosthetic
impingement, although there was no observed clinical difference
between the two treatment groups. Cite this article:
Advances in the design of the components for total ankle replacement have led to a resurgence of interest in this procedure. Between January 1999 and December 2004, 16 patients with a failed total ankle replacement were referred to our unit. In the presence of infection, a two-stage salvage procedure was planned. The first involved the removal of the components and the insertion of a cement spacer. Definitive treatment options included hindfoot fusion with a circular frame or amputation. When there was no infection, a one-stage salvage procedure was planned. Options included hindfoot fusion with an intramedullary nail or revision total ankle replacement. When there was suspicion of infection, a percutaneous biopsy was performed. The patients were followed up for a minimum of 12 months. Of the 16 patients, 14 had aseptic loosening, five of whom underwent a revision total ankle replacement and nine a hindfoot fusion. Of the two with infection, one underwent fusion and the other a below-knee amputation. There were no cases of wound breakdown, nonunion or malunion. Management of the failed total ankle replacement should be performed by experienced surgeons and ideally in units where multidisciplinary support is available. Currently, a hindfoot fusion appears to be preferable to a revision total ankle replacement.
Metallosis is a rare cause of failure after total knee replacement and has only previously been reported when there has been abnormal metal-on-metal contact. We describe 14 patients (15 knees) whose total knee replacement required revision for a new type of early failure caused by extensive metallosis. A modification of a cementless rotating platform implant, which had previously had excellent long-term survival, had been used in each case. The change was in the form of a new porous-beaded surface on the femoral component to induce cementless fixation, which had been used successfully in the fixation of acetabular and tibial components. This modification appeared to have resulted in metallosis due to abrasive two-body wear. The component has subsequently been recalled and is no longer in use. The presentation, investigation, and findings at revision are described and a possible aetiology and its implications are discussed.
