Nerve transfer has become a common and often effective reconstructive strategy for proximal and complex peripheral nerve injuries of the upper limb. This case-based discussion explores the principles and potential benefits of nerve transfer surgery and offers in-depth discussion of several established and valuable techniques including: motor transfer for elbow flexion after musculocutaneous nerve injury, deltoid reanimation for axillary nerve palsy, intrinsic re-innervation following proximal ulnar nerve repair, and critical sensory recovery despite non-reconstructable median nerve lesions.Abstract
We aimed to identify the pattern of nerve injury associated with
paediatric supracondylar fractures of the humerus. Over a 17 year period, between 1996 and 2012, 166 children were
referred to our specialist peripheral nerve injury unit. From examination
of the medical records and radiographs were recorded the nature
of the fracture, associated vascular and neurological injury, treatment
provided and clinical course.Aims
Patients and Methods
Improvements in the evaluation of outcome after nerve transfers
are required. The assessment of force using the Medical Research
Council (MRC) grades (0 to 5) is not suitable for this purpose.
A ceiling effect is encountered within MRC grade 4/5 rendering this
tool insensitive. Our aim was to show how the strength of flexion
of the elbow could be assessed in patients who have undergone a
re-innervation procedure using a continuous measurement scale. A total of 26 patients, 23 men and three women, with a mean age
of 37.3 years (16 to 66), at the time of presentation, attended
for review from a cohort of 52 patients who had undergone surgery
to restore flexion of the elbow after a brachial plexus injury and
were included in this retrospective study. The mean follow-up after
nerve transfer was 56 months (28 to 101, standard deviation (Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility
of using the intact S1 nerve root as a donor nerve to repair an avulsion
of the contralateral lumbosacral plexus. Two cohorts of patients
were recruited. In cohort 1, the L4–S4 nerve roots of 15 patients
with a unilateral fracture of the sacrum and sacral nerve injury
were stimulated during surgery to establish the precise functional
distribution of the S1 nerve root and its proportional contribution
to individual muscles. In cohort 2, the contralateral uninjured
S1 nerve root of six patients with a unilateral lumbosacral plexus
avulsion was transected extradurally and used with a 25 cm segment
of the common peroneal nerve from the injured leg to reconstruct
the avulsed plexus. The results from cohort 1 showed that the innervation of S1 in
each muscle can be compensated for by L4, L5, S2 and S3. Numbness
in the toes and a reduction in strength were found after surgery
in cohort 2, but these symptoms gradually disappeared and strength
recovered. The results of electrophysiological studies of the donor
limb were generally normal. Severing the S1 nerve root does not appear to damage the healthy
limb as far as clinical assessment and electrophysiological testing
can determine. Consequently, the S1 nerve can be considered to be
a suitable donor nerve for reconstruction of an avulsed contralateral
lumbosacral plexus. Cite this article:
Between 2002 and 2011, 81 patients with a traumatic total brachial
plexus injury underwent reconstruction by double free muscle transfer
(DFMT, 47 cases), single muscle transfer (SMT, 16 cases) or nerve
transfers (NT, 18 cases). They were evaluated for functional outcome and quality of life
(QoL) using the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire,
both pre- and post-operatively. The three groups were compared and
followed-up for at least 24 months.Aims
Methods
We reviewed 101 patients with injuries of the
terminal branches of the infraclavicular brachial plexus sustained between
1997 and 2009. Four patterns of injury were identified: 1) anterior
glenohumeral dislocation (n = 55), in which the axillary and ulnar
nerves were most commonly injured, but the axillary nerve was ruptured
in only two patients (3.6%); 2) axillary nerve injury, with or without
injury to other nerves, in the absence of dislocation of the shoulder
(n = 20): these had a similar pattern of nerve involvement to those
with a known dislocation, but the axillary nerve was ruptured in
14 patients (70%); 3) displaced proximal humeral fracture (n = 15),
in which nerve injury resulted from medial displacement of the humeral
shaft: the fracture was surgically reduced in 13 patients; and 4) hyperextension
of the arm (n = 11): these were characterised by disruption of the
musculocutaneous nerve. There was variable involvement of the median
and radial nerves with the ulnar nerve being least affected. Surgical intervention is not needed in most cases of infraclavicular
injury associated with dislocation of the shoulder. Early exploration
of the nerves should be considered in patients with an axillary
nerve palsy without dislocation of the shoulder and for musculocutaneous
nerve palsy with median and/or radial nerve palsy. Urgent operation
is needed in cases of nerve injury resulting from fracture of the
humeral neck to relieve pressure on nerves.
Whereas a general trend in the management of obstetric brachial plexus injuries has been nerve reconstruction in patients without spontaneous recovery of biceps function by three to six months of age, many recent studies suggest this may be unnecessary. In this study, the severity of glenohumeral dysplasia and shoulder function and strength in two groups of matched patients with a C5-6 lesion at a mean age of seven years (2.7 to 13.3) were investigated. One group (23 patients) underwent nerve reconstruction and secondary operations, and the other (52 patients) underwent only secondary operations for similar initial clinical presentations. In the patients with nerve reconstruction shoulder function did not improve and they developed more severe shoulder deformities (posterior subluxation, glenoid version and scapular elevation) and required a mean of 2.4 times as many operations as patients without nerve reconstruction. This study suggests that less invasive management, addressing the muscle and bone complications, is a more effective approach. Nerve reconstruction should be reserved for those less common cases where the C5 and C6 nerve roots will not recover.
The outcomes of 261 nerve injuries in 100 patients
were graded good in 173 cases (66%), fair in 70 (26.8%) and poor in
18 (6.9%) at the final review (median 28.4 months (1.3 to 64.2)).
The initial grades for the 42 sutures and graft were 11 good, 14
fair and 17 poor. After subsequent revision repairs in seven, neurolyses
in 11 and free vascularised fasciocutaneous flaps in 11, the final
grades were 15 good, 18 fair and nine poor. Pain was relieved in
30 of 36 patients by nerve repair, revision of repair or neurolysis,
and flaps when indicated. The difference in outcome between penetrating
missile wounds and those caused by explosions was not statistically
significant; in the latter group the onset of recovery from focal
conduction block was delayed (mean 4.7 months (2.5 to 10.2)
We evaluated 56 patients for neurological deficit after enucleation of a histopathologically confirmed schwannoma of the upper limb. Immediately after the operation, 41 patients (73.2%) had developed a new neurological deficit: ten of these had a major deficit such as severe motor or sensory loss, or intolerable neuropathic pain. The mean tumour size had been significantly larger in patients with a major neurological deficit than in those with a minor or no deficit. After a mean 25.4 months (12 to 85), 39 patients (70%) had no residual neurological deficit, and the other 17 (30%) had only hypoaesthesia, paraesthesiae or mild motor weakness. This study suggests that a schwannoma in the upper limb can be removed with an acceptable risk of injury to the nerve, although a transient neurological deficit occurs regularly after the operation. Biopsy is not advised. Patients should be informed pre-operatively about the possibility of damage to the nerve: meticulous dissection is required to minimise this.
A total of 11 patients with combined traumatic injuries of the brachial plexus and spinal cord were reviewed retrospectively. Brachial plexus paralysis in such dual injuries tends to be diagnosed and treated late and the prognosis is usually poor. The associated injuries, which were all on the same side as the plexus lesion, were to the head (nine cases), shoulder girdle (five), thorax (nine) and upper limb (seven). These other injuries were responsible for the delayed diagnosis of brachial plexus paralysis and the poor prognosis was probably because of the delay in starting treatment and the severity of the associated injuries. When such injuries are detected in patients with spinal cord trauma, it is important to consider the possibility of involvement of the brachial plexus.
Peripheral nerve injury is an uncommon but serious
complication of hip surgery that can adversely affect the outcome.
Several studies have described the use of electromyography and intra-operative
sensory evoked potentials for early warning of nerve injury. We
assessed the results of multimodal intra-operative monitoring during
complex hip surgery. We retrospectively analysed data collected
between 2001 and 2010 from 69 patients who underwent complex hip
surgery by a single surgeon using multimodal intra-operative monitoring
from a total pool of 7894 patients who underwent hip surgery during
this period. In 24 (35%) procedures the surgeon was alerted to a
possible lesion to the sciatic and/or femoral nerve. Alerts were
observed most frequently during peri-acetabular osteotomy. The surgeon
adapted his approach based on interpretation of the neurophysiological changes.
From 69 monitored surgical procedures, there was only one true positive
case of post-operative nerve injury. There were no false positives
or false negatives, and the remaining 68 cases were all true negative.
The sensitivity for predicting post-operative nerve injury was 100%
and the specificity 100%. We conclude that it is possible and appropriate
to use this method during complex hip surgery and it is effective
for alerting the surgeon to the possibility of nerve injury.
We conducted an anatomical study to determine
the best technique for transfer of the anterior interosseous nerve (AIN)
for the treatment of proximal ulnar nerve injuries. The AIN, ulnar
nerve, and associated branches were dissected in 24 cadaver arms.
The number of branches of the AIN and length available for transfer
were measured. The nerve was divided just proximal to its termination
in pronator quadratus and transferred to the ulnar nerve through
the shortest available route. Separation of the deep and superficial
branches of the ulnar nerve by blunt dissection alone, was also
assessed. The mean number of AIN branches was 4.8 (3 to 8) and the
mean length of the nerve available for transfer was 72 mm (41 to
106). The transferred nerve reached the ulnar nerve most distally
when placed dorsal to flexor digitorum profundus (FDP). We therefore
conclude that the AIN should be passed dorsal to FDP, and that the
deep and superficial branches of the ulnar nerve require approximately
30 mm of blunt dissection and 20 mm of sharp dissection from the
point of bifurcation to the site of the anastomosis. The use of this technique for transfer of the AIN should improve
the outcome for patients with proximal ulnar nerve injuries. Cite this article:
We prospectively studied 26 consecutive patients with clinically documented sensory or motor deficiency of a peripheral nerve due to trauma or entrapment using ultrasound, and in 19 cases surgical exploration of the nerves was undertaken. The ultrasonographic diagnoses were correlated with neurological examination and the surgical findings. Reliable visualisation of injured nerves on ultrasonography was achieved in all patients. Axonal swelling and hypoechogenity of the nerve was diagnosed in 15 cases, loss of continuity of a nerve bundle in 17, the formation of a neuroma of a stump in six, and partial laceration of a nerve with loss of the normal fascicular pattern in five. The ultrasonographic findings were confirmed at operation in those who had surgery. Ultrasound may be used for the evaluation of peripheral nerve injuries in the upper limb. High-resolution ultrasound can show the exact location, extent and type of lesion, yielding important information that might not be obtainable by other diagnostic aids.
Restoration of hand function is rarely achieved after a complete closed traction lesion of the supraclavicular brachial plexus. We describe the injury, treatment, rehabilitation and long-term results of two patients who regained good function of the upper limb and useful function in the hand after such an injury. Successful repairs were performed within six days of injury. Tinel’s sign proved accurate in predicting the ruptures and the distribution of pain was accurate in predicting avulsion. The severe pain that began on the day of injury resolved with the onset of muscle function. Recovery of muscle function preceded recovery of sensation. Recovery of the function of C and Aδ fibres was the slowest of all.
We describe a case of intraneural metastasis of a synovial sarcoma, the first published case of a metastasis of a soft-tissue sarcoma to a peripheral nerve.