The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term results
of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) in young patients using
either a conventional (CPE) or a highly cross-linked (HXLPE) polyethylene
liner in terms of functional outcome, incidence of osteolysis, radiological
wear and rate of revision. We included all patients between the ages of 45 and 65 years
who, between January 2000 and December 2001, had undergone a primary
THA for osteoarthritis at our hospital using a CPE or HXLPE acetabular
liner and a 28 mm cobalt-chrome femoral head. From a total of 160 patients, 158 (177 hips) were available for
review (CPE 89; XLPE 88). The mean age, body mass index (BMI) and
follow-up in each group were: CPE: 56.8 years (46 to 65); 30.7 kg/m2 (19
to 58); 13.2 years (2.1 to 14.7) and HXLPE: 55.6 years (45 to 65);
BMI: 30 kg/m2 (18 to 51); 13.1 years (5.7 to 14.4).Aims
Methods
In this prospective study we studied the effect
of the inclination angle of the acetabular component on polyethylene wear
and component migration in cemented acetabular sockets using radiostereometric
analysis. A total of 120 patients received either a cemented Reflection
All-Poly ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene or a cemented
Reflection All-Poly highly cross-linked polyethylene acetabular
component, combined with either cobalt–chrome or Oxinium femoral
heads. Femoral head penetration and migration of the acetabular
component were assessed with repeated radiostereometric analysis
for two years. The inclination angle was measured on a standard
post-operative anteroposterior pelvic radiograph. Linear regression
analysis was used to determine the relationship between the inclination
angle and femoral head penetration and migration of the acetabular component. We found no relationship between the inclination angle and penetration
of the femoral head at two years’ follow-up (p = 0.9). Similarly,
our data failed to reveal any statistically significant correlation
between inclination angle and migration of these cemented acetabular
components (p = 0.07 to p = 0.9).
The ideal bearing surface for young patients
undergoing total hip replacement (THR) remains controversial. We report
the five-year results of a randomised controlled trial comparing
the clinical and radiological outcomes of 102 THRs in 91 patients
who were <
65 years of age. These patients were randomised to
receive a cobalt–chrome on ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene,
cobalt–chrome on highly cross-linked polyethylene, or a ceramic-on-ceramic
bearing. In all, 97 hip replacements in 87 patients were available
for review at five years. Two hips had been revised, one for infection
and one for peri-prosthetic fracture. At the final follow-up there were no significant differences
between the groups for the mean Western Ontario and McMaster Universities
osteoarthritis index (pain, p = 0.543; function, p = 0.10; stiffness,
p = 0.99), Short Form-12 (physical component, p = 0.878; mental
component, p = 0.818) or Harris hip scores (p = 0.22). Radiological
outcomes revealed no significant wear in the ceramic group. Comparison of standard and highly cross-linked polyethylene,
however, revealed an almost threefold difference in the mean annual
linear wear rates (0.151 mm/year
