header advert
Results 341 - 360 of 4535
Results per page:
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 52-B, Issue 3 | Pages 405 - 409
1 Aug 1970
Barnes R


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 52-B, Issue 1 | Pages 200 - 200
1 Feb 1970
Piggot J


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 51-B, Issue 2 | Pages 394 - 394
1 May 1969
Apley AG


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 50-B, Issue 4 | Pages 893 - 893
1 Nov 1968
Cholmeley JA


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 43-B, Issue 2 | Pages 217 - 219
1 May 1961
Carter CO


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 36-B, Issue 4 | Pages 666 - 666
1 Nov 1954


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 90-B, Issue 2 | Pages 264 - 264
1 Feb 2008
Rowley DI


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 89-B, Issue 7 | Pages 858 - 863
1 Jul 2007
Boutron I Ravaud P Nizard R

Randomised controlled trials represent the gold standard in the evaluation of outcome of treatment. They are needed because differences between treatment effects have been minimised and observational studies may give a biased estimation of the outcome. However, conducting this kind of trial is challenging. Several methodological issues, including patient or surgeon preference, blinding, surgical standardisation, as well as external validity, have to be addressed in order to lower the risk of bias. Specific tools have been developed in order to take into account the specificity of evaluation of the literature on non-pharmacological intervention. A better knowledge of methodological issues will allow the orthopaedic surgeon to conduct more appropriate studies and to better appraise the limits of his intervention.


Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 2, Issue 5 | Pages 330 - 336
21 May 2021
Balakumar B Nandra RS Woffenden H Atkin B Mahmood A Cooper G Cooper J Hindle P

Aims

It is imperative to understand the risks of operating on urgent cases during the COVID-19 (SARS-Cov-2 virus) pandemic for clinical decision-making and medical resource planning. The primary aim was to determine the mortality risk and associated variables when operating on urgent cases during the COVID-19 pandemic. The secondary objective was to assess differences in the outcome of patients treated between sites treating COVID-19 and a separate surgical site.

Methods

The primary outcome measure was 30-day mortality. Secondary measures included complications of surgery, COVID-19 infection, and length of stay. Multiple variables were assessed for their contribution to the 30-day mortality. In total, 433 patients were included with a mean age of 65 years; 45% were male, and 90% were Caucasian.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 93-B, Issue 1 | Pages 142 - 142
1 Jan 2011
Giangrande P


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 85-B, Issue 1 | Pages 151 - 152
1 Jan 2003
Brooks A



The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 84-B, Issue 8 | Pages 1209 - 1209
1 Nov 2002
Horan F


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 84-B, Issue 7 | Pages 1089 - 1090
1 Sep 2002
Calder P


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 103-B, Issue 6 Supple A | Pages 81 - 86
1 Jun 2021
Mahfouz MR Abdel Fatah EE Johnson JM Komistek RD

Aims

The objective of this study is to assess the use of ultrasound (US) as a radiation-free imaging modality to reconstruct 3D anatomy of the knee for use in preoperative templating in knee arthroplasty.

Methods

Using an US system, which is fitted with an electromagnetic (EM) tracker that is integrated into the US probe, allows 3D tracking of the probe, femur, and tibia. The raw US radiofrequency (RF) signals are acquired and, using real-time signal processing, bone boundaries are extracted. Bone boundaries and the tracking information are fused in a 3D point cloud for the femur and tibia. Using a statistical shaping model, the patient-specific surface is reconstructed by optimizing bone geometry to match the point clouds. An accuracy analysis was conducted for 17 cadavers by comparing the 3D US models with those created using CT. US scans from 15 users were compared in order to examine the effect of operator variability on the output.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 91-B, Issue 6 | Pages 843 - 843
1 Jun 2009
Grimer R


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 83-B, Issue 8 | Pages 1211 - 1211
1 Nov 2001
Benson MKD



The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 83-B, Issue 3 | Pages 313 - 315
1 Apr 2001
Dawson J Carr A


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 82-B, Issue 6 | Pages 935 - 935
1 Aug 2000
Klenerman L