The outcome after total hip replacement has improved
with the development of surgical techniques, better pain management
and the introduction of enhanced recovery pathways. These pathways
require a multidisciplinary team to manage pre-operative education,
multimodal pain control and accelerated rehabilitation. The current economic
climate and restricted budgets favour brief hospitalisation while
minimising costs. This has put considerable pressure on hospitals
to combine excellent results, early functional recovery and shorter
admissions. In this review we present an evidence-based summary of some common
interventions and methods, including pre-operative patient education,
pre-emptive analgesia, local infiltration analgesia, pre-operative
nutrition, the use of pulsed electromagnetic fields, peri-operative
rehabilitation, wound dressings, different surgical techniques, minimally
invasive surgery and fast-track joint replacement units. Cite this article:
The increasing need for total hip replacement
(THR) in an ageing population will inevitably generate a larger number
of revision procedures. The difficulties encountered in dealing
with the bone deficient acetabulum are amongst the greatest challenges
in hip surgery. The failed acetabular component requires reconstruction
to restore the hip centre and improve joint biomechanics. Impaction
bone grafting is successful in achieving acetabular reconstruction
using both cemented and cementless techniques. Bone graft incorporation
restores bone stock whilst providing good component stability. We
provide a summary of the evidence and current literature regarding impaction
bone grafting using both cemented and cementless techniques in revision
THR. Cite this article:
Young adults with hip pain secondary to femoroacetabular
impingement (FAI) are rapidly being recognised as an important cohort
of orthopaedic patients. Interest in FAI has intensified over the
last decade since its recognition as a precursor to arthritis of
the hip and the number of publications related to the topic has
increased exponentially in the last decade. Although not all patients
with abnormal hip morphology develop osteoarthritis (OA), those
with FAI-related joint damage rapidly develop premature OA. There
are no explicit diagnostic criteria or definitive indications for
surgical intervention in FAI. Surgery for symptomatic FAI appears
to be most effective in younger individuals who have not yet developed
irreversible OA. The difficulty in predicting prognosis in FAI means
that avoiding unnecessary surgery in asymptomatic individuals, while
undertaking intervention in those that are likely to develop premature
OA poses a considerable dilemma. FAI treatment in the past has focused
on open procedures that carry a potential risk of complications. Recent developments in hip arthroscopy have facilitated a minimally
invasive approach to the management of FAI with few complications
in expert hands. Acetabular labral preservation and repair appears
to provide superior results when compared with debridement alone.
Arthroscopic correction of structural abnormalities is increasingly becoming
the standard treatment for FAI, however there is a paucity of high-level
evidence comparing open and arthroscopic techniques in patients
with similar FAI morphology and degree of associated articular cartilage damage.
Further research is needed to develop an understanding of the natural
course of FAI, the definitive indications for surgery and the long-term
outcomes. Cite this article:
In a time of limited resources, the debate continues
over which types of hip prosthesis are clinically superior and more
cost-effective. Orthopaedic surgeons increasingly need robust economic
evidence to understand the full value of the operation, and to aid
decision making on the ‘package’ of procedures that are available
and to justify their practice beyond traditional clinical preference. In this paper we explore the current economic debate about the
merits of cemented and cementless total hip replacement, an issue
that continues to divide the orthopaedic community. Cite this article:
In this paper, we will consider the current role
of metal-on-metal bearings by looking at three subtypes of MoM hip
arthroplasty separately: Hip resurfacing, large head (>
36 mm) MoM
THA and MoM THA with traditional femoral head sizes.
In this paper we make the case for the use of
single-stage revision for infected knee arthroplasty.
Peri-prosthetic infection remains a leading cause
of revision surgery. Recent publications from the American Musculoskeletal
Infection Society have sought to establish a definition of peri-prosthetic
infection based on clinical findings and laboratory investigations.
The limitations of their approach are discussed and an alternative
definition is proposed, which it is felt may better reflect the
uncertainties encountered in clinical practice.
Radiological assessment of total and unicompartmental
knee replacement remains an essential part of routine care and follow-up.
Appreciation of the various measurements that can be identified
radiologically is important. It is likely that routine plain radiographs
will continue to be used, although there has been a trend towards
using newer technologies such as CT, especially in a failing knee,
where it provides more detailed information, albeit with a higher
radiation exposure. The purpose of this paper is to outline the radiological parameters
used to evaluate knee replacements, describe how these are measured
or classified, and review the current literature to determine their
efficacy where possible.
This review summarises the opinions and conclusions
reached from a symposium on infected total knee replacement (TKR)
held at the British Association of Surgery of the Knee (BASK) annual
meeting in 2011. The National Joint Registry for England and Wales
reported 5082 revision TKRs in 2010, of which 1157 (23%) were caused
by infection. The diagnosis of infection beyond the acute post-operative
stage relies on the identification of the causative organism by
aspiration and analysis of material obtained at arthroscopy. Ideal
treatment then involves a two-stage surgical procedure with extensive
debridement and washout, followed by antibiotics. An articulating
or non-articulating drug-eluting cement spacer is used prior to
implantation of the revision prosthesis, guided by the serum level
of inflammatory markers. The use of a single-stage revision is gaining popularity
and we would advocate its use in certain patients where the causative
organism is known, no sinuses are present, the patient is not immunocompromised,
and there is no radiological evidence of component loosening or
osteitis. It is our opinion that single-stage revision produces high-quality
reproducible results and will soon achieve the same widespread acceptance
as it does in infected hip arthroplasty.