header advert
Results 281 - 300 of 4529
Results per page:
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 92-B, Issue 6 | Pages 904 - 904
1 Jun 2010
Ross A


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 89-B, Issue 7 | Pages 991 - 991
1 Jul 2007
Maffulli N



The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 87-B, Issue 6 | Pages 885 - 886
1 Jun 2005
LACHIEWICZ PF


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 88-B, Issue 2 | Pages 159 - 162
1 Feb 2006
Hakkalamani S Rawal A Hennessy MS Parkinson RW


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 89-B, Issue 1 | Pages 144 - 144
1 Jan 2007
Calder P


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 95-B, Issue 5 | Pages 678 - 682
1 May 2013
Holinka J Pilz M Kubista B Presterl E Windhager R

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether coating titanium discs with selenium in the form of sodium selenite decreased bacterial adhesion of Staphylococcus aureus and Staph. epidermidis and impeded osteoblastic cell growth.

In order to evaluate bacterial adhesion, sterile titanium discs were coated with increasing concentrations of selenium and incubated with bacterial solutions of Staph. aureus (ATCC 29213) and Staph. epidermidis (DSM 3269) and stained with Safranin-O. The effect of selenium on osteoblastic cell growth was also observed. The adherence of MG-63 cells on the coated discs was detected by staining with Safranin-O. The proportion of covered area was calculated with imaging software.

The tested Staph. aureus strain showed a significantly reduced attachment on titanium discs with 0.5% (p = 0.011) and 0.2% (p = 0.02) selenium coating. Our test strain from Staph. epidermidis showed a highly significant reduction in bacterial adherence on discs coated with 0.5% (p = 0.0099) and 0.2% (p = 0.002) selenium solution. There was no inhibitory effect of the selenium coating on the osteoblastic cell growth.

Selenium coating is a promising method to reduce bacterial attachment on prosthetic material.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:678–82.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 88-B, Issue 3 | Pages 419 - 419
1 Mar 2006
Wade P


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 88-B, Issue 7 | Pages 841 - 851
1 Jul 2006
Lee EH Hui JHP



The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 87-B, Issue 9 | Pages 1178 - 1181
1 Sep 2005
Harrison WJ


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 88-B, Issue 4 | Pages 559 - 559
1 Apr 2006
Laurence M




The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 88-B, Issue 3 | Pages 416 - 417
1 Mar 2006
SARMIENTO A


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 89-B, Issue 1 | Pages 141 - 142
1 Jan 2007
SUNDERAMOORTHY D


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 92-B, Issue 1 | Pages 186 - 186
1 Jan 2010
Klenerman L


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 88-B, Issue 5 | Pages 699 - 699
1 May 2006
Hawken RMA