In this cross sectional study, the impact and the efficacy of a surveillance programme for sarcomas of the extremities was analysed. All patients who had treatment with curative intent for a high-grade sarcoma and were diagnosed before 2014 were included and followed for a minimum of two years.Objectives
Methods
Pelvic reconstruction after the resection of a tumour around
the acetabulum is a challenging procedure due to the complex anatomy
and biomechanics. Several pelvic endoprostheses have been introduced,
but the rates of complication remain high. Our aim was to review
the use of a stemmed acetabular pedestal cup in the management of
these patients. The study involved 48 patients who underwent periacetabular reconstruction
using a stemmed pedestal cup (Schoellner cup; Zimmer Biomet Inc.,
Warsaw, Indiana) between 2000 and 2013. The indications for treatment included
a primary bone tumour in 27 patients and metastatic disease in 21
patients. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was
52 years (16 to 83).Aims
Patients and Methods
The aim of this study was to identify any progression between
benign osteofibrous dysplasia (OFD), OFD-like adamantinoma and malignant
adamantinoma, and to investigate the rates of local recurrence,
metastases and survival, in order to develop treatment algorithms
for each. A single institution retrospective review of all patients presenting
with OFD, OFD-like adamantinoma and adamantinoma between 1973 and
2012 was undertaken. Complete data were available for 73 patients
(42 with OFD; ten with an OFD-like adamantinoma and 21 with an adamantinoma).
The mean follow-up was 10.3 years (3 to 25) for OFD, 9.2 years (3.0
to 26.3) for OFD-like and 11.6 years (0.25 to 33) for adamantinoma.Aims
Patients and Methods
Due to the complex anatomy of the pelvis, limb-sparing resections
of pelvic tumours achieving adequate surgical margins, can often
be difficult. The advent of computer navigation has improved the
precision of resection of these lesions, though there is little
evidence comparing resection with or without the assistance of navigation. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of navigation-assisted surgery
for the resection of pelvic bone tumours involving the posterior
ilium and sacrum. Using our prospectively updated institutional database, we conducted
a retrospective case control study of 21 patients who underwent
resection of the posterior ilium and sacrum, for the treatment of
a primary sarcoma of bone, between 1987 and 2015. The resection
was performed with the assistance of navigation in nine patients
and without navigation in 12. We assessed the accuracy of navigation-assisted
surgery, as defined by the surgical margin and how this affects
the rate of local recurrence, the disease-free survival and the
effects on peri-and post-operative morbidity. Aims
Patients and Methods
The October 2015 Research Roundup360 looks at: Wasted implants; Biofilms revisited; Peri-operative anticoagulation not required in atrial fibrillation; Determinants in outcome following orthopaedic surgery; Patient ‘activation’ and outcomes; Neuroplasticity and nerve repair; KOOS Score in predicting injury?
The purpose of this retrospective study was to differentiate
between the MRI features of normal post-operative change and those
of residual or recurrent disease after intralesional treatment of
an atypical cartilage tumour (ACT)/grade I chondrosarcoma. We reviewed the case notes, radiology and histology of 75 patients,
who had been treated for an ACT/grade I chondrosarcoma by curettage,
phenolisation and bone allografting between 1994 and 2005. The first
post-operative Gd-enhanced MRI scan was carried out within one year
of surgery. Patients had a minimum of two scans and a mean follow-up
of 72 months (13 to 169). Further surgery was undertaken in cases
of suspected recurrence.Aims
Patients and Methods
Cite this article: A. A. Abubakar, M. M. Noordin, T. I. Azmi, U. Kaka, M. Y. Loqman. The use of rats and mice as animal models in
Peri-acetabular tumour resections and their subsequent
reconstruction are among the most challenging procedures in orthopaedic
oncology. Despite the fact that a number of different pelvic endoprostheses
have been introduced, rates of complication remain high and long-term
results are mostly lacking. In this retrospective study, we aimed to evaluate the outcome
of reconstructing a peri-acetabular defect with a pedestal cup endoprosthesis
after a type 2 or type 2/3 internal hemipelvectomy. A total of 19 patients (11M:8F) with a mean age of 48 years (14
to 72) were included, most of whom had been treated for a primary
bone tumour (n = 16) between 2003 and 2009. After a mean follow-up
of 39 months (28 days to 8.7 years) seven patients had died. After
a mean follow-up of 7.9 years (4.3 to 10.5), 12 patients were alive,
of whom 11 were disease-free. Complications occurred in 15 patients.
Three had recurrent dislocations and three experienced aseptic loosening.
There were no mechanical failures. Infection occurred in nine patients,
six of whom required removal of the prosthesis. Two patients underwent
hindquarter amputation for local recurrence. The implant survival rate at five years was 50% for all reasons,
and 61% for non-oncological reasons. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor
Society score at final follow-up was 49% (13 to 87). Based on these poor results, we advise caution if using the pedestal
cup for reconstruction of a peri-acetabular tumour resection. Cite this article:
The diagnosis of surgical site infection following endoprosthetic reconstruction for bone tumours is frequently a subjective diagnosis. Large clinical trials use blinded Central Adjudication Committees (CACs) to minimise the variability and bias associated with assessing a clinical outcome. The aim of this study was to determine the level of inter-rater and intra-rater agreement in the diagnosis of surgical site infection in the context of a clinical trial. The Prophylactic Antibiotic Regimens in Tumour Surgery (PARITY) trial CAC adjudicated 29 non-PARITY cases of lower extremity endoprosthetic reconstruction. The CAC members classified each case according to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) criteria for surgical site infection (superficial, deep, or organ space). Combinatorial analysis was used to calculate the smallest CAC panel size required to maximise agreement. A final meeting was held to establish a consensus.Objectives
Materials and Methods
