The October 2013 Oncology Roundup360 looks at:
Bone sarcomas are rare cancers and orthopaedic
surgeons come across them infrequently, sometimes unexpectedly during
surgical procedures. We investigated the outcomes of patients who
underwent a surgical procedure where sarcomas were found unexpectedly
and were subsequently referred to our unit for treatment. We identified
95 patients (44 intra-lesional excisions, 35 fracture fixations,
16 joint replacements) with mean age of 48 years (11 to 83); 60%
were males (n = 57). Local recurrence arose in 40% who underwent
limb salvage surgery Cite this article:
The February 2014 Oncology Roundup360 looks at: suspicious lesions; limb salvage in pelvic sarcomas; does infection affect oncological survival?; cancer patient pathways; radiological arthritis with cement augmentation in GCT; and post-chemotherapy increase in tumour volume as a predictor of poor prognosis.
The pre-operative differentiation between enchondroma,
low-grade chondrosarcoma and high-grade chondrosarcoma remains a
diagnostic challenge. We reviewed the accuracy and safety of the
radiological grading of cartilaginous tumours through the assessment
of, first, pre-operative radiological and post-operative histological agreement,
and second the rate of recurrence in lesions confirmed as high-grade
on histology. We performed a retrospective review of major long
bone cartilaginous tumours managed by curettage as low grade between
2001 and 2012. A total of 53 patients with a mean age of 47.6 years
(8 to 71) were included. There were 23 men and 30 women. The tumours
involved the femur (n = 20), humerus (n = 18), tibia (n = 9), fibula
(n = 3), radius (n = 2) and ulna (n = 1). Pre-operative diagnoses
resulted from multidisciplinary consensus following radiological
review alone for 35 tumours, or with the addition of pre-operative
image guided needle biopsy for 18. The histologically confirmed diagnosis
was enchondroma for two (3.7%), low-grade chondrosarcoma for 49
(92.6%) and high-grade chondrosarcoma for two (3.7%). Three patients
with a low-grade tumour developed a local recurrence at a mean of 15
months (12 to 17) post-operatively. A single high-grade recurrence
(grade II) was treated with tibial diaphyseal replacement. The overall
recurrence rate was 7.5% at a mean follow-up of 4.7 years (1.2 to
12.3). Cartilaginous tumours identified as low-grade on pre-operative
imaging with or without additional image-guided needle biopsy can
safely be managed as low-grade without pre-operative histological
diagnosis. A few tumours may demonstrate high-grade features histologically,
but the rates of recurrence are not affected. Cite this article:
The December 2013 Oncology Roundup360 looks at: Peri-articular resection fraught with complications; Navigated margins; Skeletal tumours and thromboembolism; Conditional survival in Ewing’s sarcoma; Reverse shoulders and tumour; For how long should we follow up sarcoma patients?; and already metastasised?
The June 2015 Oncology Roundup360 looks at: Infection in megaprosthesis; Impressive results for mid femoral reconstruction; Revered teaching or old myth? Femoral neck protection in metastatic disease; Megaprosthesis about the knee; Malignant transformation in multiple hereditary exostoses; Fracture of intercalary bone allograft; Comorbidity and outcomes in sarcoma; A worrying turn? Use of denosumab for giant cell tumour of bone
The August 2013 Oncology Roundup360 looks at: spinal osteosarcoma: all hope is not lost; intralesional curettage for low-grade chondrosarcoma?; isolated limb perfusion is a salvage option; worryingly high infection rates in patients with endoprostheses; how bad is endoprosthetic infection?; operatively treated metastatic disease; and cementoplasty gives immediate pain relief
Guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic bone
disease (MBD) have been available to the orthopaedic community for
more than a decade, with little improvement in service provision
to this increasingly large patient group. Improvements in adjuvant
and neo-adjuvant treatments have increased both the number and overall
survival of patients living with MBD. As a consequence the incidence
of complications of MBD presenting to surgeons has increased and
is set to increase further. The British Orthopaedic Oncology Society
(BOOS) are to publish more revised detailed guidelines on what represents
‘best practice’ in managing patients with MBD. This article is designed
to coincide with and publicise new BOOS guidelines and once again
champion the cause of patients with MBD. A series of short cases highlight common errors frequently being
made in managing patients with MBD despite the availability of guidelines.Objectives
Methods
In this case study, we describe the clinical
presentation and treatment of 36 patients with periosteal chondrosarcoma
collected over a 59-year period by the archive of the Netherlands
Committee on Bone Tumours. The demographics, clinical presentation,
radiological features, treatment and follow-up are presented with
the size, location, the histological grading of the tumour and the
survival. We found a slight predominance of men (61%), and a predilection
for the distal femur (33%) and proximal humerus (33%). The metaphysis
was the most common site (47%) and the most common presentation
was with pain (44%). Half the tumours were classified histologically
as grade 1. Pulmonary metastases were reported in one patient after
an intra-lesional resection. A second patient died from local recurrence
and possible pulmonary and skin metastases after an incomplete resection. It is clearly important to make the diagnosis appropriately because
an incomplete resection may result in local recurrence and metastatic
spread. Staging for metastatic disease is recommended in grade II
or III lesions. These patients should be managed with a contrast-enhanced MRI
of the tumour and histological confirmation by biopsy, followed
by Cite this article:
Using the United States Nationwide Inpatient
Sample, we identified national trends in revision spinal fusion
along with a comprehensive comparison of comorbidities, inpatient
complications and surgical factors of revision spinal fusion compared
to primary spinal fusion. In 2009, there were 410 158 primary spinal fusion discharges
and 22 128 revision spinal fusion discharges. Between 2002 and 2009,
primary fusion increased at a higher rate compared with revision
fusion (56.4% In the multivariable logistic regression model for all spinal
fusions, depression (odds ratio (OR) 1.53, p <
0.001), psychotic
disorders (OR 1.49, p <
0.001), deficiency anaemias (OR 1.35,
p <
0.001) and smoking (OR 1.10, p = 0.006) had a greater chance
of occurrence in revision spinal fusion discharges than in primary
fusion discharges, adjusting for other variables. In terms of complications,
after adjusting for all significant comorbidities, this study found
that dural tears (OR 1.41; p <
0.001) and surgical site infections
(OR 3.40; p <
0.001) had a greater chance of occurrence in revision
spinal fusion discharges than in primary fusion discharges (p <
0.001). A p-value <
0.01 was considered significant in all final
analyses. Cite this article:
The June 2013 Oncology Roundup360 looks at: whether allograft composite is superior to megaprosthesis in massive reconstruction; pain from glomus tumours; thromboembolism and orthopaedic malignancy; bone marrow aspirate and cavity lesions; metastasectomy in osteosarcoma; spinal giant cell tumour; post-atomic strike sarcoma; and superficial sarcomas and post-operative infection rates.
We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of 33
consecutive patients who had undergone an extra-articular, total or
partial scapulectomy for a malignant tumour of the shoulder girdle
between 1 July 2001 and 30 September 2013. Of these, 26 had tumours
which originated in the scapula or the adjacent soft tissue and
underwent a classic Tikhoff–Linberg procedure, while seven with
tumours arising from the proximal humerus were treated with a modified
Tikhoff-Linberg operation. We used a Ligament Advanced Reinforcement
System for soft-tissue reconstruction in nine patients, but not
in the other 24. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score (MSTS) was 17.6
(95% confidence interval (CI) 15.9 to 19.4); 17.6 (95% CI 15.5 to
19.6) after the classic Tikhoff–Linberg procedure and 18.1 (95%
CI 13.8 to 22.3) after the modified Tikhoff–Linberg procedure. Patients
who had undergone a LARS soft-tissue reconstruction had a mean score
of 18.6 (95% (CI) 13.9 to 22.4) compared with 17.2 (95% CI 15.5
to 19.0) for those who did not. The Tikhoff–Linberg procedure is a useful method for wide resection
of a malignant tumour of the shoulder girdle which helps to preserve
hand and elbow function. The method of soft-tissue reconstruction
has no effect on functional outcome. Cite this article:
In 1999, we developed a technique for biological
reconstruction after excision of a bone tumour, which involved using
autografts of the bone containing the tumour treated with liquid
nitrogen. We have previously reported the use of this technique
in 28 patients at a mean follow up of 27 months (10 to 54). In this study, we included 72 patients who underwent reconstruction
using this technique. A total of 33 patients died and three were
lost to follow-up, at a mean of 23 months (2 to 56) post-operatively,
leaving 36 patients available for a assessment at a mean of 101
months 16 to 163) post-operatively. The methods of reconstruction included
an osteo-articular graft in 16, an intercalary in 13 and, a composite
graft with prosthesis in seven. Post-operative function was excellent in 26 patients (72.2%),
good in seven (19.4%), and fair in three (8.3%) according to the
functional evaluation system of Enneking. No recurrent tumour occurred
within the grafts. The autografts survived in 29 patients (80.6%),
and the rates of survival at five and ten years were 86.1% and 80.6
%, respectively. Seven of 16 osteo-articular grafts (44%) failed
because of fracture or infection, but all the composite and intercalary
grafts survived. The long-term outcomes of frozen autografting, particularly using
composite and intercalary grafts, are satisfactory and thus represent
a good method of treatment for patients with a sarcoma of bone or
soft tissue. Cite this article:
We investigated the functional outcome in patients
who underwent reverse shoulder replacement (RSR) after removal of
a tumour of the proximal humerus. A total of 16 patients (ten women
and six men) underwent this procedure between 1998 and 2011 in our
hospital. Five patients died and one was lost to follow-up. Ten
patients were available for review at a mean follow-up of 46 months
(12 to 136). Eight patients had a primary and two patients a secondary
bone tumour. At final follow up the mean range of active movement was: abduction
78° (30° to 150°); flexion 98° (45° to 180°); external rotation
32° (10° to 60°); internal rotation 51° (10° to 80°). The mean Musculoskeletal
Tumor Society score was 77% (60% to 90%) and the mean Toronto Extremity
Salvage Score was 70% (30% to 91%). Two patients had a superficial
infection and one had a deep infection and underwent a two-stage
revision procedure. In two patients there was loosening of the RSR;
one dislocated twice. All patients had some degree of atrophy or
pseudo-atrophy of the deltoid muscle. Use of a RSR in patients with a tumour of the proximal humerus
gives acceptable results. Cite this article:
We evaluated the risk of late relapse and further
outcome in patients with soft-tissue sarcomas who were alive and event-free
more than five years after initial treatment. From our database
we identified 1912 patients with these pathologies treated between
1980 and 2006. Of these 1912 patients, 603 were alive and event-free
more than five years after initial treatment and we retrospectively
reviewed them. The mean age of this group was 48 years (4 to 94)
and 340 were men. The mean follow-up was 106 months (60 to 336).
Of the original cohort, 582 (97%) were alive at final follow-up.
The disease-specific survival was 96.4% (95% confidence interval
(CI) 94.4 to 98.3) at ten years and 92.9% (95% CI 89 to 96.8) at
15 years. The rate of late relapse was 6.3% (38 of 603). The ten-
and 15-year event-free rates were 93.2% (95% CI 90.8 to 95.7) and
86.1% (95% CI 80.2 to 92.1), respectively. Multivariate analysis
showed that tumour size and tumour grade remained independent predictors
of events. In spite of further treatment, 19 of the 38 patients
died of sarcoma. The three- and five-year survival rates after the
late relapse were 56.2% (95% CI 39.5 to 73.3) and 43.2% (95% CI
24.7 to 61.7), respectively, with a median survival time of 46 months.
Patients with soft-tissue sarcoma, especially if large, require
long-term follow-up, especially as they have moderate potential
to have their disease controlled. Cite this article:
The purpose of this study was to develop a prognostic model for
predicting survival of patients undergoing surgery owing to metastatic
bone disease (MBD) in the appendicular skeleton. We included a historical cohort of 130 consecutive patients (mean
age 64 years, 30 to 85; 76 females/54 males) who underwent joint
arthroplasty surgery (140 procedures) owing to MBD in the appendicular
skeleton during the period between January 2003 and December 2008.
Primary cancer, pre-operative haemoglobin, fracture Aims
Methods
The October 2015 Oncology Roundup360 looks at: Radiotherapy for the radioresistant; Multiple hereditary exostosis; The total femur as a limb salvage option; Survival prediction in osteosarcoma; What happens when chondrosarcoma recurs?; Thumbs up for vascularised fibular graft; Radiotherapy and survival; Musculoskeletal tumours in pregnancy
The April 2013 Oncology Roundup360 looks at: the margin for error; new money for old risks; hindquarter amputation; custom tumour jigs; preserving the tibial epiphysis; how long is long enough?; genomics and radiation-induced bone tumours; and India ink.