In developmental dysplasia of the hip, a deficient acetabulum may be augmented by placing local autogenous iliac osseous graft, or the ilium itself, over the head of the femur with the expectation that the added bone will function as a bearing surface. We analysed this bone obtained en bloc during subsequent surgery which was performed for degenerative osteoarthritis in three patients at 6, 25 and 30 years after the initial augmentation procedure. In each patient, the augmentation comprised of red cancellous bone covered on its articulating surface by a distinct layer of white tissue. Microscopy of this tissue showed parallel rows of spindle-shaped cells lying between linearly arranged collagen bundles typical of joint capsule. Biochemical analysis showed type I collagen, the principal collagen of joint capsule and bone, with no significant quantity of type II collagen, the principal collagen of cartilage. While the added bone produced by acetabular augmentation was durable, histological and biochemical analyses suggested that it had not undergone cartilage metaplasia. The augmented acetabulum articulates with the head of the femur by means of an interposed hip joint capsule.

We present a retrospective study of 27 patients treated by callus distraction using a unilateral external fixator of our own design for nonunion with bone loss and shortening of the femur caused by suppurative osteomyelitis. The unilateral external fixator was used either alone or in combination with an intramedullary nail. The mean age of the patients was 13.6 years (8 to 18). The fixator was used alone in 13 patients and with an intramedullary nail in 14. The bone results at a mean follow-up of 88 months (37 to 144) were excellent in 16 patients and good in 11.

The functional results were excellent in 18 patients and good in nine. However, four patients still had draining sinuses at the latest follow-up. A residual deformity greater than 7° was present in seven femora, but this did not adversely affect function or require further treatment.

We retrospectively evaluated 42 hips which had undergone acetabular reconstruction using the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device between September 1994 and December 1998. We used autogenous bone chips from the ilium and ceramic particle morsellised grafts, even in large acetabular bone defects, in the early stages of the study. Thereafter, femoral head allograft was used as bulk graft in patients with large acetabular defects. Ceramic blocks and the patients’ contralateral femoral head were also used as bulk graft. The mean follow-up period was 8.7 years (4.3 to 12).

Survivorship analysis was performed using radiological failure of the acetabular component, irrespective of whether it was revised, or not, as the end-point.

The survival rate of the morsellised graft group (25 hips) and the bulk graft group (17 hips) at ten years was 53% (95% confidence interval (CI) 42.5% to 63.5%) and 82% (95% CI 72.4% to 91.6%), respectively. The mid-term results of revision total hip replacement with the Kerboull device were better when bulk graft was used in any size of bone defect.

Because the femoral head/neck junction is preserved in hip resurfacing, patients may be at greater risk of impingement, leading to abnormal wear patterns and pain. We assessed femoral head/neck offset in 63 hips undergoing metal-on-metal hip resurfacing and in 56 hips presenting with non-arthritic pain secondary to femoroacetabular impingement. Most hips undergoing resurfacing (57%; 36) had an offset ratio ≤ 0.15 pre-operatively and required greater correction of offset at operation than the rest of the group. In the non-arthritic hips the mean offset ratio was 0.137 (0.04 to 0.23), with the offset ratio correlating negatively to an increasing α angle. An offset ratio ≤ 0.15 had a 9.5-fold increased relative risk of having an α angle ≥ 50.5°. Most hips undergoing resurfacing have an abnormal femoral head/neck offset, which is best assessed in the sagittal plane.

We treated 26 hips (24 consecutive patients) with residual dysplasia by a technique of incomplete triple pelvic osteotomy. The mean age of the patients was 21.6 years.

The mean values for the pre-operative centre-edge angle of Wiberg, the refined centre-edge angle, the acetabular angle of Sharp, the modified acetabular angle and femoral head lateralisation were 7.7°, −3.1°, 49.3°, 53.2° and 17.2 mm, respectively. After a mean follow-up of 3.3 years they were 27.0°, 13.0°, 38.9°, 44.3° and 15.9 mm, respectively (p < 0.05). The osteoarthritic grading changed adversely in one hip. The mean pre-operative and latest Harris hip scores were 74.9 and 93.0, respectively (p < 0.05).

This technique provides a stable osteotomy with maintenance of the posterior column which allows early mobilisation and minimal internal fixation. The technique is not complex and requires minimal blood transfusion. The use of an image intensifier is not necessary and harvesting of a subcristal bone graft avoids post-operative complications at the donor site.

We describe the experience with the first consecutive 230 Birmingham hip resurfacings at our centre. At a mean follow-up of three years (25 to 52 months) survivorship was 99.14% with revision in one patient for a loose acetabular component and one death from unrelated causes. One patient developed a fracture of the femoral neck at six weeks which united unremarkably after a period of non-weight-bearing. The Harris hip score improved from a mean of 62.54 (8 to 92) to 97.74 (61 to 100). The mean flexion improved from 91.52° (25 to 140) to 110.41° (80 to 145).

Most patients (97%) considered the outcome to be good or excellent. Our preliminary experience with this implant is encouraging and the results are superior to the earlier generation of resurfacings for the same length of follow-up.

Although the importance of sound statistical principles in the design and analysis of data has gained prominence in recent years, biostatistics, the application of statistics to the analysis of biological and medical data, is still a subject which is poorly understood and often mishandled. This review introduces, in the context of orthopaedic research, the terminology and the principles involved in simple data analysis, and outlines areas of medical statistics that have gained prominence in recent years. It also lists and provides an insight into some of the more common errors that occur in published orthopaedic journals and which are frequently encountered at the review stage in papers submitted to the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.