Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 221 - 240 of 269
Results per page:
Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 7, Issue 1 | Pages 20 - 22
1 Feb 2018


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 99-B, Issue 2 | Pages 151 - 158
1 Feb 2017
Huang T Long Y George D Wang W

Aims

There are two techniques widely used to determine the rotational alignment of the components in total knee arthroplasty (TKA); gap balancing (GB) and measured resection (MR). Which technique is the best remains controversial. We aimed to investigate this in a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Materials and Methods

In accordance with the methods of Cochrane, databases were searched for all randomised controlled trials in the literature between January 1986 and June 2015 comparing radiographic and clinical outcomes between the use of these two tecniques. Meta-analysis involved the use of the Revman5.3 software provided by Cochrane collaboration.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 100-B, Issue 10 | Pages 1261 - 1261
1 Oct 2018
Bhandari M Peterson D


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 100-B, Issue 2 | Pages 134 - 142
1 Feb 2018
Hexter AT Hislop SM Blunn GW Liddle AD

Aims

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious complication of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Different bearing surface materials have different surface properties and it has been suggested that the choice of bearing surface may influence the risk of PJI after THA. The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the rate of PJI between metal-on-polyethylene (MoP), ceramic-on-polyethylene (CoP), and ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearings.

Patients and Methods

Electronic databases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane library, Web of Science, and Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature) were searched for comparative randomized and observational studies that reported the incidence of PJI for different bearing surfaces. Two investigators independently reviewed studies for eligibility, evaluated risk of bias, and performed data extraction. Meta-analysis was performed using the Mantel–Haenzel method and random-effects model in accordance with methods of the Cochrane group.


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 6, Issue 6 | Pages 28 - 31
1 Dec 2017


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 6, Issue 6 | Pages 14 - 16
1 Dec 2017


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 5, Issue 3 | Pages 26 - 28
1 Jun 2016


Objectives

Tranexamic acid (TXA) is an antifibrinolytic agent used as a blood-sparing technique in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and is routinely administered by intravenous (IV) or intra-articular (IA) injection. Recently, a novel method of TXA administration, the combined IV and IA application of TXA, has been applied in TKA. However, the scientific evidence of combined administration of TXA in TKA is still meagre. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of combined IV and IA TXA in patients undergoing TKA.

Materials and Methods

A systematic search was carried out in PubMed, the Cochrane Clinical Trial Register (Issue12 2015), Embase, Web of Science and the Chinese Biomedical Database. Only randomised controlled trials (RCT) evaluating the efficacy and safety of combined use TXA in TKA were identified. Two authors independently identified the eligible studies, extracted data and assessed the methodological quality of included studies. Meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.3 software.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 98-B, Issue 4 | Pages 437 - 441
1 Apr 2016
Middleton S Toms A

We explored the literature surrounding whether allergy and hypersensitivity has a clinical basis for implant selection in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In error, the terms hypersensitivity and allergy are often used synonymously. Although a relationship is present, we could not find any evidence of implant failure due to allergy. There is however increasing basic science that suggests a link between loosening and metal ion production. This is not an allergic response but is a potential problem. With a lack of evidence logically there can be no justification to use ‘hypoallergenic’ implants in patients who have pre-existing skin sensitivity to the metals used in TKA.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:437–41.


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 6, Issue 3 | Pages 19 - 21
1 Jun 2017


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 6, Issue 3 | Pages 28 - 30
1 Jun 2017


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 6, Issue 3 | Pages 14 - 16
1 Jun 2017


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 6, Issue 3 | Pages 2 - 6
1 Jun 2017
Das A Shivji F Ollivere BJ


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 6, Issue 1 | Pages 24 - 26
1 Feb 2017


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 99-B, Issue 6 | Pages 714 - 723
1 Jun 2017
Grassi A Nitri M Moulton SG Marcheggiani Muccioli GM Bondi A Romagnoli M Zaffagnini S

Aims

Our aim was to perform a meta-analysis of the outcomes of revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, comparing the use of different types of graft.

Materials and Methods

A search was performed of Medline and Pubmed using the terms “Anterior Cruciate Ligament” and “ACL” combined with “revision”, “re-operation” and “failure”. Only studies that reported the outcome at a minimum follow-up of two years were included. Two authors reviewed the papers, and outcomes were subdivided into autograft and allograft. Autograft was subdivided into hamstring (HS) and bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB). Subjective and objective outcome measures were analysed and odds ratios with confidence intervals were calculated.


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 5, Issue 6 | Pages 26 - 27
1 Dec 2016


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 5, Issue 6 | Pages 16 - 18
1 Dec 2016


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 5, Issue 5 | Pages 34 - 35
1 Oct 2016


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 3, Issue 6 | Pages 10 - 12
1 Dec 2014

The December 2014 Hip & Pelvis Roundup360 looks at: Sports and total hips; topical tranexamic acid and blood conservation in hip replacement; blind spots and biases in hip research; no recurrence in cam lesions at two years; to drain or not to drain?; sonication and diagnosis of implant associated infection; and biomarkers and periprosthetic infection


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 98-B, Issue 8 | Pages 1014 - 1019
1 Aug 2016
Bryson DJ Morris DLJ Shivji FS Rollins KR Snape S Ollivere BJ

Prophylactic antibiotics can decrease the risk of wound infection and have been routinely employed in orthopaedic surgery for decades. Despite their widespread use, questions still surround the selection of antibiotics for prophylaxis, timing and duration of administration. The health economic costs associated with wound infections are significant, and the judicious but appropriate use of antibiotics can reduce this risk.

This review examines the evidence behind commonly debated topics in antibiotic prophylaxis and highlights the uses and advantages of some commonly used antibiotics.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:1014–19.