Wound complications are reported in up to 10% hip and knee arthroplasties and there is a proven association between wound complications and deep prosthetic infections. In this randomised controlled trial (RCT) we explore the potential benefits of a portable, single use, incisional negative pressure wound therapy dressing (iNPWTd) on wound exudate, length of stay (LOS), wound complications, dressing changes and cost-effectiveness following total hip and knee arthroplasties. A total of 220 patients undergoing elective primary total hip and knee arthroplasties were recruited into in a non-blinded RCT. For the final analysis there were 102 patients in the study group and 107 in the control group.Objectives
Methods
The results of the DRAFFT (distal radius acute
fracture fixation trial) study, which compared volar plating with
Kirschner (K-) wire fixation for dorsally displaced fractures of
the distal radius, were published in August 2014. The use of K-wires
to treat these fractures is now increasing, with a concomitant decline
in the use of volar locking plates. We provide a critical appraisal of the DRAFFT study and question
whether surgeons have been unduly influenced by its headline conclusions. Cite this article:
The PROximal Fracture of the Humerus: Evaluation by Randomisation (PROFHER) trial has recently demonstrated that surgery is non-superior to non-operative treatment in the management of displaced proximal humeral fractures. The objective of this study was to assess current surgical practice in the context of the PROFHER trial in terms of patient demographics, injury characteristics and the nature of the surgical treatment. A total of ten consecutive patients undergoing surgery for the treatment of a proximal humeral fracture from each of 11 United Kingdom hospitals were retrospectively identified over a 15 month period between January 2014 and March 2015. Data gathered for the 110 patients included patient demographics, injury characteristics, mode of surgical fixation, the grade of operating surgeon and the cost of the surgical implants.Objectives
Methods
Recently, several high impact randomised controlled
trials have been published suggesting no greater benefit from orthopaedic
surgery over conservative treatment, or limited surgical intervention.
These studies can have profound effects on clinical practice, leading
to the abandonment of previously widely-used operations. How do surgeons who believe these operations are beneficial over
conservative treatment rationalise these findings, and justify their
use with hospital administrators and health care funders who require
evidence for the value and efficacy of surgical treatment? Cite this article:
The December 2015 Wrist &
Hand Roundup
In March 2012, an algorithm for the treatment
of intertrochanteric fractures of the hip was introduced in our academic
department of Orthopaedic Surgery. It included the use of specified
implants for particular patterns of fracture. In this cohort study,
102 consecutive patients presenting with an intertrochanteric fracture
were followed prospectively (post-algorithm group). Another 117
consecutive patients who had been treated immediately prior to the
implementation of the algorithm were identified retrospectively
as a control group (pre-algorithm group). The total cost of the
implants prior to implementation of the algorithm was $357 457 (mean:
$3055 (1947 to 4133)); compared with $255 120 (mean: $2501 (1052
to 4133)) after its implementation. There was a trend toward fewer complications
in patients who were treated using the algorithm (33% pre- The implementation of an evidence-based algorithm for the treatment
of intertrochanteric fractures reduced costs while maintaining quality
of care with a lower rate of complications and re-admissions. Cite this article:
We wanted to investigate regional variations in the organisms
reported to be causing peri-prosthetic infections and to report
on prophylaxis regimens currently in use across England. Analysis of data routinely collected by Public Health England’s
(PHE) national surgical site infection database on elective primary
hip and knee arthroplasty procedures between April 2010 and March
2013 to investigate regional variations in causative organisms.
A separate national survey of 145 hospital Trusts (groups of hospitals
under local management) in England routinely performing primary
hip and/or knee arthroplasty was carried out by standard email questionnaire.Objectives
Methods
We aimed to determine whether there is evidence of improved patient
outcomes in Major Trauma Centres following the regionalisation of
trauma care in England. An observational study was undertaken using the Trauma Audit
and Research Network (TARN), Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) and
national death registrations. The outcome measures were indicators
of the quality of trauma care, such as treatment by a senior doctor
and clinical outcomes, such as mortality in hospital.Aims
Patients and Methods
The June 2015 Foot &
Ankle Roundup360 looks at: Syndesmosis and outcomes in ankle fracture; Ankle arthrodesis or arthroplasty: a complications-based analysis; Crosslinked polyethylene and ankle arthroplasty; Reducing screw removal in calcaneal osteotomies; Revisiting infection control policies; Chevron osteotomy: proximal or distal?; Ankle distraction for osteoarthritis
This is the second of a series of reviews of registries. This review looks specifically at worldwide registry data that have been collected on knee arthroplasty, what we have learned from their reports, and what the limitations are as to what we currently know.
