To compare the gait of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA)
and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients with healthy controls,
using a machine-learning approach. 145 participants (121 healthy controls, 12 patients with cruciate-retaining
TKA, and 12 with mobile-bearing medial UKA) were recruited. The
TKA and UKA patients were a minimum of 12 months post-operative,
and matched for pattern and severity of arthrosis, age, and body
mass index. Participants walked on an instrumented treadmill until their
maximum walking speed was reached. Temporospatial gait parameters,
and vertical ground reaction force data, were captured at each speed.
Oxford knee scores (OKS) were also collected. An ensemble of trees
algorithm was used to analyse the data: 27 gait variables were used
to train classification trees for each speed, with a binary output
prediction of whether these variables were derived from a UKA or
TKA patient. Healthy control gait data was then tested by the decision
trees at each speed and a final classification (UKA or TKA) reached
for each subject in a majority voting manner over all gait cycles
and speeds. Top walking speed was also recorded.Aims
Patients and Methods
To evaluate the effectiveness of an institutionally developed
algorithm for evaluation and diagnosis of prosthetic joint injection
and to determine the impact of this protocol on overall hospital
re-admissions.p We retrospectively evaluated 2685 total hip arthroplasty (THA)
and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients prior to (1263) and following
(1422) the introduction of an infection detection protocol. The
protocol used conservative thresholds for C-reactive protein to
direct the medical attendant to aspirate the joint. The protocol
incorporated a clear set of laboratory and clinical criteria that
allowed a patient to be discharged home if all were met. Patients were
included if they presented to our emergency department within 120
days post-operatively with concerns for swelling, pain or infection
and were excluded if they had an unambiguous infection or if their
chief complaint was non-orthopaedic in nature.Aims
Patients and Methods
A small proportion of patients have persistent
pain after total knee replacement (TKR). The primary aim of this study
was to record the prevalence of pain after TKR at specific intervals
post-operatively and to ascertain the impact of neuropathic pain.
The secondary aim was to establish any predictive factors that could
be used to identify patients who were likely to have high levels
of pain or neuropathic pain after TKR. A total of 96 patients were included in the study. Their mean
age was 71 years (48 to 89); 54 (56%) were female. The mean follow-up
was 46 months (39 to 51). Pre-operative demographic details were
recorded including a Visual Analogue Score (VAS) for pain, the Hospital
Anxiety and Depression score as well as the painDETECT score for neuropathic
pain. Functional outcome was assessed using the Oxford Knee score. The mean pre-operative VAS was 5.8 (1 to 10); and it improved
significantly at all time periods post-operatively (p <
0.001):
(from 4.5 at day three to five (1 to 10), 3.2 at six weeks (0 to
9), 2.4 at three months (0 to 7), 2.0 at six months (0 to 9), 1.7
at nine months (0 to 9), 1.5 at one year (0 to 8) and 2.0 at mean
46 months (0 to 10)). There was a high correlation (r >
0.7; p <
0.001) between the mean VAS scores for pain and the mean painDETECT
scores at three months, one year and three years post-operatively.
There was no correlation between the pre-operative scores and any
post-operative scores at any time point. We report the prevalence of pain and neuropathic pain at various
intervals up to three years after TKR. Neuropathic pain is an underestimated
problem in patients with pain after TKR. It peaks at between six
weeks and three-months post-operatively. However, from these data
we were unable to predict which patients are most likely to be affected. Cite this article:
The aim of this study was to assess the effect of multimorbidity
on improvements in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) following
total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Using data from a regional joint registry for 14 573 patients,
HRQoL was measured prior and one year following surgery using the
Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS), and the 12-Item
Short-Form Health Survey Physical and Mental Component Summary scores
(PCS and MCS, respectively). Multimorbidity was defined as the concurrence
of two or more self-reported chronic conditions. A linear mixed-effects
model was used to test the effects of multimorbidity and the number
of chronic conditions on improvements in HRQoL.Aims
Patients and Methods
To investigate the bone penetration of intravenous antibiotic
prophylaxis with flucloxacillin and gentamicin during hip and knee
arthroplasty, and their efficacy against Bone samples from the femoral head, neck and acetabulum were
collected from 18 patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA)
and from the femur and tibia in 21 patients during total knee arthroplasty
(TKA). The concentration of both antibiotics in the samples was
analysed using high performance liquid chromatography. Penetration
was expressed as a percentage of venous blood concentration. The
efficacy against common infecting organisms was measured against
both the minimum inhibitory concentration 50, and the more stringent epidemiological
cutoff value for resistance (ECOFF).Aims
Patients and Methods
Fractures around total knee arthroplasties pose
a significant surgical challenge. Most can be managed with osteosynthesis
and salvage of the replacement. The techniques of fixation of these
fractures and revision surgery have evolved and so has the assessment
of outcome. This specialty update summarises the current evidence
for the classification, methods of fixation, revision surgery and
outcomes of the management of periprosthetic fractures associated
with total knee arthroplasty. Cite this article:
We obtained information from the Elective Orthopaedic
Centre on 1523 patients with baseline and six-month Oxford hip scores
(OHS) after undergoing primary hip replacement (THR) and 1784 patients
with Oxford knee scores (OKS) for primary knee replacement (TKR)
who completed a six-month satisfaction questionnaire. Receiver operating characteristic curves identified an absolute
change in OHS of 14 points or more as the point that discriminates
best between patients’ satisfaction levels and an 11-point change
for the OKS. Satisfaction is highest (97.6%) in patients with an
absolute change in OHS of 14 points or more, compared with lower
levels of satisfaction (81.8%) below this threshold. Similarly,
an 11-point absolute change in OKS was associated with 95.4% satisfaction
compared with 76.5% below this threshold. For the six-month OHS
a score of 35 points or more distinguished patients with the highest
satisfaction level, and for the six-month OKS 30 points or more identified
the highest level of satisfaction. The thresholds varied according
to patients’ pre-operative score, where those with severe pre-operative
pain/function required a lower six-month score to achieve the highest
levels of satisfaction. Our data suggest that the choice of a six-month follow-up to
assess patient-reported outcomes of THR/TKR is acceptable. The thresholds
help to differentiate between patients with different levels of
satisfaction, but external validation will be required prior to
general implementation in clinical practice.
Electronic forms of data collection have gained interest in recent
years. In orthopaedics, little is known about patient preference
regarding pen-and-paper or electronic questionnaires. We aimed to
determine whether patients undergoing total hip (THR) or total knee
replacement (TKR) prefer pen-and-paper or electronic questionnaires
and to identify variables that predict preference for electronic
questionnaires. We asked patients who participated in a multi-centre cohort study
investigating improvement in health-related quality of life (HRQoL)
after THR and TKR using pen-and-paper questionnaires, which mode
of questionnaire they preferred. Patient age, gender, highest completed
level of schooling, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, indication
for joint replacement and pre-operative HRQoL were compared between
the groups preferring different modes of questionnaire. We then
performed logistic regression analyses to investigate which variables
independently predicted preference of electronic questionnaires.Objectives
Methods
We report the results of revision total knee
replacement (TKR) in 26 patients with major metaphyseal osteolytic defects
using 29 trabecular metal cones in conjunction with a rotating hinged
total knee prosthesis. The osteolytic defects were types II and
III (A or B) according to the Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute
(AORI) classification. The mean age of the patients was 72 years
(62 to 84) and there were 15 men and 11 women. In this series patients had
undergone a mean of 2.34 previous total knee arthroplasties. The
main objective was to restore anatomy along with stability and function
of the knee joint to allow immediate full weight-bearing and active
knee movement. Outcomes were measured using Knee Society scores,
Oxford knee scores, range of movement of the knee and serial radiographs.
Patients were followed for a mean of 36 months (24 to 49). The mean
Oxford knee clinical scores improved from 12.83 (10 to 15) to 35.20
(32 to 38) (p <
0.001) and mean American Knee Society scores
improved from 33.24 (13 to 36) to 81.12 (78 to 86) (p <
0.001).
No radiolucent lines suggestive of loosening were seen around the trabecular
metal cones, and by one year all the radiographs showed good osteo-integration.
There was no evidence of any collapse or implant migration. Our
early results confirm the findings of others that trabecular metal
cones offer a useful way of managing severe bone loss in revision
TKR. Cite this article:
This study reports on the first 150 consecutive
Oxford cementless unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKA) performed
in an independent centre (126 patients). All eligible patients had
functional scores (Oxford knee score and high activity arthroplasty
score) recorded pre-operatively and at two- and five-years of follow-up. Fluoroscopically
aligned radiographs were taken at five years and analysed for any
evidence of radiolucent lines (RLLs), subsidence or loosening. The
mean age of the cohort was 63.6 years (39 to 86) with 81 (53.1%)
males. Excellent functional scores were maintained at five years
and there were no progressive RLLs demonstrated on radiographs.
Two patients underwent revision to a total knee arthroplasty giving
a revision rate of 0.23/100 (95% confidence interval 0.03 to 0.84)
component years with overall component survivorship of 98.7% at
five years. There were a further four patients who underwent further
surgery on the same knee, two underwent bearing exchanges for dislocation
and two underwent lateral UKAs for disease progression. This was
a marked improvement from other UKAs reported in New Zealand Joint
Registry data and supports the designing centre’s early results. Cite this article:
Current analysis of unicondylar knee replacements
(UKRs) by national registries is based on the pooled results of medial
and lateral implants. Consequently, little is known about the differential
performance of medial and lateral replacements and the influence
of each implant type within these pooled analyses. Using data from
the National Joint Registry for England and Wales (NJR) we aimed
to determine the proportion of UKRs implanted on the lateral side
of the knee, and their survival and reason for failure compared
with medial UKRs. By combining information on the side of operation
with component details held on the NJR, we were able to determine
implant laterality (medial
The role of high tibial osteotomy (HTO) is being questioned by
the use of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in the treatment
of medial compartment femorotibial osteoarthritis. Our aim was to
compare the outcomes of revision HTO or UKA to a total knee arthroplasty
(TKA) using computer-assisted surgery in matched groups of patients. We conducted a retrospective study to compare the clinical and
radiological outcome of patients who underwent revision of a HTO
to a TKA (group 1) with those who underwent revision of a medial
UKA to a TKA (group 2). All revision procedures were performed using
computer-assisted surgery. We extracted these groups of patients
from our database. They were matched by age, gender, body mass index,
follow-up and pre-operative functional score. The outcomes included
the Knee Society Scores (KSS), radiological outcomes and the rate
of further revision.Aims
Patients and Methods
The aim of this study was to compare the maximum
laxity conferred by the cruciate-retaining (CR) and posterior-stabilised
(PS) Triathlon single-radius total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for anterior
drawer, varus–valgus opening and rotation in eight cadaver knees
through a defined arc of flexion (0º to 110º). The null hypothesis
was that the limits of laxity of CR- and PS-TKAs are not significantly
different. The investigation was undertaken in eight loaded cadaver knees
undergoing subjective stress testing using a measurement rig. Firstly
the native knee was tested prior to preparation for CR-TKA and subsequently
for PS-TKA implantation. Surgical navigation was used to track maximal
displacements/rotations at 0º, 30º, 60º, 90º and 110° of flexion.
Mixed-effects modelling was used to define the behaviour of the
TKAs. The laxity measured for the CR- and PS-TKAs revealed no statistically
significant differences over the studied flexion arc for the two
versions of TKA. Compared with the native knee both TKAs exhibited
slightly increased anterior drawer and decreased varus-valgus and
internal-external roational laxities. We believe further study is required
to define the clinical states for which the additional constraint
offered by a PS-TKA implant may be beneficial. Cite this article:
Peri-prosthetic infection is amongst the most
common causes of failure following total knee replacement (TKR).
In the presence of established infection, thorough joint debridement
and removal of all components is necessary following which new components
may be implanted. This can be performed in one or two stages; two-stage revision
with placement of an interim antibiotic-loaded spacer is regarded
by many to be the standard procedure for eradication of peri-prosthetic
joint infection. We present our experience of a consecutive series of 50 single-stage
revision TKRs for established deep infection performed between 1979
and 2010. There were 33 women and 17 men with a mean age at revision
of 66.8 years (42 to 84) and a mean follow-up of 10.5 years (2 to
24). The mean time between the primary TKR and the revision procedure
was 2.05 years (1 to 8). Only one patient required a further revision for recurrent infection,
representing a success rate of 98%. Nine patients required further
revision for aseptic loosening, according to microbiological testing
of biopsies taken at the subsequent surgery. Three other patients
developed a further septic episode but none required another revision. These results suggest that a single-stage revision can produce
comparable results to a two-stage revision. Single-stage revision
offers a reduction in costs as well as less morbidity and inconvenience
for patients. Cite this article:
The purpose of this study was to compare clinical
outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after manipulation under
anaesthesia (MUA) for post-operative stiffness with a matched cohort
of TKA patients who did not requre MUA. In total 72 patients (mean age 59.8 years, 42 to 83) who underwent
MUA following TKA were identified from our prospective database
and compared with a matched cohort of patients who had undergone
TKA without subsequent MUA. Patients were evaluated for range of
movement (ROM) and clinical outcome scores (Western Ontario and
McMaster Universities Arthritis Index, Short-Form Health Survey,
and Knee Society Clinical Rating System) at a mean follow-up of
36.4 months (12 to 120). MUA took place at a mean of nine weeks
(5 to 18) after TKA. In patients who required MUA, mean flexion
deformity improved from 10° (0° to 25°) to 4.4° (0° to 15°) (p <
0.001),
and mean range of flexion improved from 79.8° (65° to 95°) to 116°
(80° to 130°) (p <
0.001). There were no statistically significant
differences in ROM or functional outcome scores at three months,
one year, or two years between those who required MUA and those
who did not. There were no complications associated with manipulation At most recent follow-up, patients requiring MUA achieved equivalent
ROM and clinical outcome scores when compared with a matched control
group. While other studies have focused on ROM after manipulation,
the current study adds to current literature by supplementing this
with functional outcome scores. Cite this article:
We sought to establish whether an oxidised zirconium (OxZr) femoral
component causes less loss of polyethylene volume than a cobalt
alloy (CoCr) femoral component in total knee arthroplasty. A total of 20 retrieved tibial inserts that had articulated with
OxZr components were matched with 20 inserts from CoCr articulations
for patient age, body mass index, length of implantation, and revision
diagnosis. Changes in dimensions of the articular surfaces were compared
with those of pristine inserts using laser scanning. The differences
in volume between the retrieved and pristine surfaces of the two
groups were calculated and compared.Aims
Materials and Methods
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has been successfully
performed in the United States healthcare system on outpatients.
Despite differences in healthcare structure and financial environment,
we hypothesised that it would be feasible to replicate this success
and perform UKA with safe day of surgery discharge within the NHS,
in the United Kingdom. This has not been reported in any other United
Kingdom centres. We report our experience of implementing a pathway to allow safe
day of surgery discharge following UKA. Data were prospectively
collected on 72 patients who underwent UKA as a day case between
December 2011 and September 2015. Aims
Patients and Methods
Following arthroplasty of the knee, the patient’s
perception of improvement in symptoms is fundamental to the assessment
of outcome. Better clinical outcome may offset the inferior survival
observed for some types of implant. By examining linked National
Joint Registry (NJR) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)
data, we aimed to compare PROMs collected at a minimum of six months
post-operatively for total (TKR: n = 23 393) and unicondylar knee
replacements (UKR: n = 505). Improvements in knee-specific (Oxford
knee score, OKS) and generic (EuroQol, EQ-5D) scores were compared
and adjusted for case-mix differences using multiple regression.
Whereas the improvements in the OKS and EQ-5D were significantly
greater for TKR than for UKR, once adjustments were made for case-mix
differences and pre-operative score, the improvements in the two
scores were not significantly different. The adjusted mean differences
in the improvement of OKS and EQ-5D were 0.0 (95% confidence interval (CI)
-0.9 to 0.9; p = 0.96) and 0.009 (95% CI -0.034 to 0.015; p = 0.37),
respectively. We found no difference in the improvement of either knee-specific
or general health outcomes between TKR and UKR in a large cohort
of registry patients. With concerns about significantly higher revision
rates for UKR observed in worldwide registries, we question the
widespread use of an arthroplasty that does not confer a significant
benefit in clinical outcome.
To define Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) thresholds
for the Oxford hip score (OHS) and Oxford knee score (OKS) at mid-term
follow-up. In a prospective multicentre cohort study, OHS and OKS were collected
at a mean follow-up of three years (1.5 to 6.0), combined with a
numeric rating scale (NRS) for satisfaction and an external validation
question assessing the patient’s willingness to undergo surgery
again. A total of 550 patients underwent total hip replacement (THR)
and 367 underwent total knee replacement (TKR).Objectives
Methods
