In our unit, we adopt a two-stage surgical reconstruction approach using internal fixation for the management of infected Charcot foot deformity. We evaluate our experience with this functional limb salvage method. We conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of all patients with infected Charcot foot deformity who underwent two-stage reconstruction with internal fixation between July 2011 and November 2019, with a minimum of 12 months’ follow-up.Aims
Methods
The treatment of peri-prosthetic joint infection
(PJI) of the ankle is not standardised. It is not clear whether
an algorithm developed for hip and knee PJI can be used in the management
of PJI of the ankle. We evaluated the outcome, at two or more years
post-operatively, in 34 patients with PJI of the ankle, identified
from a cohort of 511 patients who had undergone total ankle replacement.
Their median age was 62.1 years (53.3 to 68.2), and 20 patients
were women. Infection was exogenous in 28 (82.4%) and haematogenous
in six (17.6%); 19 (55.9%) were acute infections and 15 (44.1%)
chronic. Staphylococci were the cause of 24 infections (70.6%).
Surgery with retention of one or both components was undertaken
in 21 patients (61.8%), both components were replaced in ten (29.4%),
and arthrodesis was undertaken in three (8.8%). An infection-free
outcome with satisfactory function of the ankle was obtained in
23 patients (67.6%). The best rate of cure followed the exchange
of both components (9/10, 90%). In the 21 patients in whom one or
both components were retained, four had a relapse of the same infecting organism
and three had an infection with another organism. Hence the rate
of cure was 66.7% (14 of 21). In these 21 patients, we compared
the treatment given to an algorithm developed for the treatment
of PJI of the knee and hip. In 17 (80.9%) patients, treatment was
not according to the algorithm. Most (11 of 17) had only one criterion against
retention of one or both components. In all, ten of 11 patients
with severe soft-tissue compromise as a single criterion had a relapse-free
survival. We propose that the treatment concept for PJI of the ankle
requires adaptation of the grading of quality of the soft tissues. Cite this article
Limited forefoot amputation in diabetic patients
with osteomyelitis is frequently required. We retrospectively reviewed
diabetic patients with osteomyelitis, an unhealed ulcer and blood
pressure in the toe of >
45 mmHg who underwent limited amputation
of the foot with primary wound closure. Between 2006 and 2012, 74
consecutive patients with a mean age of 67 years (29 to 93), and
a median follow-up of 31 months, were included. All the wounds healed
primarily at a median of 37 days (13 to 210; mean 48). At a median
of 6 months (1.5 to 18; mean 353 days), 23 patients (31%) suffered
a further ulceration. Of these, 12 patients (16% of the total) required
a further amputation. We conclude that primary wound closure following limited amputation
of the foot in patients with diabetes is a safe and effective technique
when associated with appropriate antibiotic treatment. Cite this article:
We report a systematic review and meta-analysis
of published randomised and quasi-randomised trials evaluating the
efficacy of pre-operative skin antisepsis and cleansing techniques
in reducing foot and ankle skin flora. The post-preparation culture
number (Post-PCN) was the primary outcome. The data were evaluated
using a modified version of the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool. We
identified eight trials (560 participants, 716 feet) that met the inclusion
criteria. There was a significant difference in the proportions
of Post-PCN between hallux nailfold (HNF) and toe web spaces (TWS)
sites: 0.47 Meta-analyses showed that alcoholic chlorhexidine had better
efficacy than alcoholic povidone-iodine (PI) at HNF sites (risk
difference 0.19 (95% CI 0.08 to 0.30); p = 0.0005); a two-step intervention
using PI scrub and paint (S&
P) followed by alcohol showed significantly
better efficacy over PI (S&
P) alone at TWS sites (risk difference
0.13 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.24); p = 0.0169); and a two-step intervention
using chlorhexidine scrub followed by alcohol showed significantly
better efficacy over PI (S&
P) alone at the combined (HNF with
TWS) sites (risk difference 0.27 (95% CI 0.13 to 0.40); p <
0.0001).
No significant difference was found between cleansing techniques. Cite this article:
