The February 2024 Shoulder & Elbow Roundup. 360. looks at: Does indomethacin prevent heterotopic ossification following elbow fracture fixation?; Arthroscopic capsular shift in atraumatic shoulder joint instability; Ultrasound-guided lavage with corticosteroid injection versus sham; Combined surgical and exercise-based interventions following primary traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation: a systematic review and meta-analysis; Are vascularized fibula autografts a long-lasting reconstruction after intercalary resection of the humerus for primary bone tumours?; Anatomical versus reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with limited forward elevation; Tension band or plate fixation for simple displaced olecranon fractures?; Is long-term follow-up and monitoring in shoulder and elbow arthroplasty needed?

Indomethacin is commonly administered for the prophylaxis of heterotopic ossification (HO) after the surgical treatment of acetabular fractures. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs such as indomethacin, have been associated with delayed healing of fractures and mechanically weaker callus. Our aim was to determine if patients with an acetabular fracture, who received indomethacin for prophylaxis against HO, were at risk of delayed healing or nonunion of any associated fractures of long bones. We reviewed 282 patients who had had open reduction and internal fixation of an acetabular fracture. Patients at risk of HO were randomised to receive either radiation therapy (XRT) or indomethacin. Of these patients, 112 had sustained at least one concomitant fracture of a long bone; 36 needed no prophylaxis, 38 received focal radiation and 38 received indomethacin. Fifteen patients developed 16 nonunions. When comparing patients who received indomethacin with those who did not, a significant difference was noted in the rate of nonunion (26% v 7%; p = 0.004). Patients with concurrent fractures of the acetabulum and long bones who receive indomethacin have a significantly greater risk of nonunion of the fractures of the long bones when compared with those who receive XRT or no prophylaxis

We report a prospective, randomised, blinded clinical comparison of the use of indomethacin or radiation therapy for the prevention of heterotopic ossification (HO) in 75 adults who had open reduction and internal fixation of acetabular fractures through either a Kocher-Langenbeck, a combined ilioinguinal and Kocher-Langenbeck, or an extended iliofemoral approach. Indomethacin, 25 mg, was given three times daily for six weeks. Radiation with 800 cGy was delivered within three days of operation. Plain radiographs were reviewed and given Brooker classification scores by three independent observers who were unaware of the method of prophylaxis. One patient died from unrelated causes and two were lost to follow-up, leaving 72, 33 in the radiation group and 39 in the indomethacin group, available for evaluation at a mean of 12 months (6 to 48). There was no significant difference in the two groups in terms of age, gender, injury severity score, estimated blood loss, delay to surgery, head injury, presence of femoral head dislocation, or operating time, and no complications due to either method of treatment. The final extent of HO was already present by six weeks in all patients who were followed up. Three patients in the radiation group and five who received indomethacin developed HO of Brooker grade III. Two patients in the indomethacin group developed Brooker IV changes; both had failed to receive proper doses of the drug. Cochran-Armitage analysis showed no significant difference between the two treatment groups as regards the formation of HO. Indomethacin and single-dose radiation therapy are both safe and effective for the prevention of HO after operation for acetabular fractures. Radiation therapy is, however, approximately 200 times more expensive than indomethacin therapy at our institution and has other risks

We have studied prospectively the effect of indomethacin on the development of heterotopic ossification (HO) after the internal fixation of acetabular fractures. After operation 107 patients randomly received either a six-week course of indomethacin or no treatment against HO. Plain radiographs of 101 patients at a mean of 7.9 months after surgery showed HO in 47.4% of the 57 patients who received indomethacin and in 56.8% of the 44 who did not. This difference was not statistically significant. Heterotopic ossification of Brooker class II or more was seen in four patients (7%) with prophylaxis and in one without (p = 0.51). Measurements of the volume of HO on 3-D CT reconstructions showed a median value of 1.5 cm. 3. in patients with indomethacin and 4.0 cm. 3. in those without (p = 0.28). When only the 57 patients in whom the operation was carried out through either a Kocher-Langenbeck or an extended iliofemoral approach were included the indomethacin group showed a median volume of 1.7 cm. 3. compared with 3.6 cm. 3. On plain radiographs Brooker class II or above was seen in 9.4% of the patients receiving indomethacin and in 4.8% of those who did not. Indomethacin was therefore not effective in preventing ectopic bone formation after surgery for acetabular fractures. There was a significant association of male gender with volume of HO using a non-parametric analysis of variance

We studied the safety of combining the postoperative use of a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug with low-dose heparin. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial we reviewed the complications in 235 patients after total hip replacement, all treated with low-dose heparin and either indomethacin or a placebo. The incidence and type of complications in the two groups were nearly equal; indomethacin-treated patients had no increase in complications related to bleeding. Postoperative bleeding into drains was marginally greater in the indomethacin group, although the difference was not statistically significant. We conclude that treatment with indomethacin and low-dose heparin after hip replacement does not significantly increase the bleeding or other complications. We also found that patients receiving indomethacin were mobilised an average of one day before those on placebo

From 1987 to 1991, we treated 53 patients with 54 fractures of the acetabulum by reconstruction through a posterior or an extended iliofemoral surgical approach. For prophylaxis against heterotopic ossification we used perioperative irradiation and indomethacin. Indomethacin was given as daily doses of 25 mg started within 24 hours of operation and continued for four weeks. Irradiation was by either 1200 cGy in three daily doses or by a single 700 cGy dose on the first postoperative day. All patients were followed for at least one year postoperatively and the severity of heterotopic ossification was recorded using the Brooker classification and correlated with hip mobility. The combination therapy proved very effective; 44 fractures showed no heterotopic ossification and ten showed Brooker class I. The functional results were good and there were no complications of this therapy. Irradiation with 1200 cGy did not appear to offer any therapeutic advantage over the 700 cGy dose

We report a double-blind study of the effectiveness of indomethacin suppositories in the relief of postoperative pain and the reduction in demand for opiate analgesia following orthopaedic procedures

We have carried out a prospective, randomised study of prophylaxis for heterotopic ossification (HO) comparing indomethacin for 7 and 14 days, acetylsalicylic acid, and fractional (4 × 3 Gy) or single exposure of 5 or 7 Gy irradiation after operation. We initially had 723 patients (733 hip replacements), but after withdrawals there were 685 hips of which 18.4% developed HO; 14% were grade I, 2.9% grade II and 1.5% grade III of the Brooker classification. We compared the results between these groups with those of a matched control series and found that indomethacin, 2 × 50 mg for 7 and 14 days, and postoperative irradiation of 4 × 3 Gy or 1 × 7 Gy, significantly reduced the development of HO compared with the control group. Patients in the acetylsalicylic acid group and those with a single irradiation of 5 Gy after operation developed significantly more ossification than those in the indomethacin and other irradiation groups. We suggest the use of 2 × 50 mg of indomethacin with mucoprotection for seven days as prophylaxis against HO after total hip replacement for all patients. A single irradiation of 7 Gy is recommended for patients who have developed HO after previous operations or to whom administration of indomethacin is contraindicated

The June 2014 Children’s orthopaedics Roundup. 360 . looks at: plaster wedging in paediatric forearm fractures; the medial approach for DDH; Ponseti – but not as he knew it?; Salter osteotomy more accurate than Pemberton in DDH; is the open paediatric fracture an emergency?; bang up-to-date with femoral external fixation; indomethacin, heterotopic ossification and cerebral palsy hips; lengthening nails for congenital femoral deformities, and is MRI the answer to imaging of the physis?

There is increasing evidence that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can adversely affect bone repair. We have, therefore, studied the in vitro effects of NSAIDs, which differentially inhibit cyclooxygenases (COX), the prostaglandin/thromboxane synthesising enzymes, on human osteoblasts. Indomethacin and the new nitric oxide (NO)-donating NSAIDs block the activity of both COX-1 and COX-2. Indomethacin and 5,5-dimethyl-3-(3 fluorophenyl)-4-(4 methylsulphonal) phenyl-2 (5H)-furanone (DFU) reduced osteoblast numbers in a dose-dependant manner and increased collagen synthesis and alkaline phosphatase activity. The reduction in osteoblast numbers was not caused by loss of adhesion and was reversible. Neither NSAID influenced DNA synthesis. There was no difference between the effects of indomethacin and DFU. NO-NSAIDs did not affect cell numbers. These results suggest that care should be taken when administering NSAIDs to patients with existing skeletal problems and that NO-NSAIDs may be safer

Post-traumatic elbow stiffness is a disabling condition that remains challenging for upper limb surgeons. Open elbow arthrolysis is commonly used for the treatment of stiff elbow when conservative therapy has failed. Multiple questions commonly arise from surgeons who deal with this disease. These include whether the patient has post-traumatic stiff elbow, how to evaluate the problem, when surgery is appropriate, how to perform an excellent arthrolysis, what the optimal postoperative rehabilitation is, and how to prevent or reduce the incidence of complications. Following these questions, this review provides an update and overview of post-traumatic elbow stiffness with respect to the diagnosis, preoperative evaluation, arthrolysis strategies, postoperative rehabilitation, and prevention of complications, aiming to provide a complete diagnosis and treatment path.

Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-9:576–584.

Aims

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of non-selective and selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in preventing heterotopic ossification (HO) after total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Objectives

Experimental studies indicate that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may have negative effects on fracture healing. This study aimed to assess the effect of immediate and delayed short-term administration of clinically relevant parecoxib doses and timing on fracture healing using an established animal fracture model.

Aims

The crucial role of the radial head in the stability of the elbow in terrible triad injury is acknowledged. This retrospective study aims to compare the results of resection of a severely comminuted radial head with or without prosthetic arthroplasty as part of the reconstruction for this injury.

Objectives

Cortical and cancellous bone healing processes appear to be histologically different. They also respond differently to anti-inflammatory agents. We investigated whether the leucocyte composition on days 3 and 5 after cortical and cancellous injuries to bone was different, and compared changes over time using day 3 as the baseline.

Aims

The aim of this study was to analyze the results of two radiocapitellar prostheses in a large case series followed prospectively, with medium-term follow-up.

Objectives

Many in vitro studies have investigated the mechanism by which mechanical signals are transduced into biological signals that regulate bone homeostasis via periodontal ligament fibroblasts during orthodontic treatment, but the results have not been systematically reviewed. This review aims to do this, considering the parameters of various in vitro mechanical loading approaches and their effects on osteogenic and osteoclastogenic properties of periodontal ligament fibroblasts.