Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MITLIF)
has been well validated in overweight and obese patients who are
consequently subject to a higher radiation exposure. This prospective
multicentre study aimed to investigate the efficacy of a novel lumbar
localisation system for MITLIF in overweight patients. The initial study group consisted of 175 patients. After excluding
49 patients for various reasons, 126 patients were divided into
two groups. Those in Group A were treated using the localisation
system while those in Group B were treated by conventional means.
The primary outcomes were the effective radiation dosage to the
surgeon and the exposure time.Aims
Patients and Methods
No previous studies have examined the physical
characteristics of patients with cauda equina syndrome (CES). We compared
the anthropometric features of patients who developed CES after
a disc prolapse with those who did not but who had symptoms that
required elective surgery. We recorded the age, gender, height,
weight and body mass index (BMI) of 92 consecutive patients who
underwent elective lumbar discectomy and 40 consecutive patients who
underwent discectomy for CES. On univariate analysis, the mean BMI
of the elective discectomy cohort (26.5 kg/m2 (16.6 to
41.7) was very similar to that of the age-matched national mean
(27.6 kg/m2, p = 1.0). However, the mean BMI of the CES
cohort (31.1 kg/m2 (21.0 to 54.9)) was significantly
higher than both that of the elective group (p <
0.001) and the
age-matched national mean (p <
0.001). A similar pattern was
seen with the weight of the groups. Multivariate logistic regression
analysis was performed, adjusted for age, gender, height, weight
and BMI. Increasing BMI and weight were strongly associated with
an increased risk of CES (odds ratio (OR) 1.17, p <
0.001; and
OR 1.06, p <
0.001, respectively). However, increasing height
was linked with a reduced risk of CES (OR 0.9, p <
0.01). The
odds of developing CES were 3.7 times higher (95% confidence interval
(CI) 1.2 to 7.8, p = 0.016) in the overweight and obese (as defined
by the World Health Organization: BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2) than
in those of ideal weight. Those with very large discs (obstructing
>
75% of the spinal canal) had a larger BMI than those with small
discs (obstructing <
25% of the canal; p <
0.01). We therefore
conclude that increasing BMI is associated with CES.