A pilon fracture is a severe ankle joint injury caused by high-energy trauma, typically affecting men of working age. Although relatively uncommon (5% to 7% of all tibial fractures), this injury causes among the worst functional and health outcomes of any skeletal injury, with a high risk of serious complications and long-term disability, and with devastating consequences on patients’ quality of life and financial prospects. Robust evidence to guide treatment is currently lacking. This study aims to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of two surgical interventions that are most commonly used to treat pilon fractures. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) of 334 adult patients diagnosed with a closed type C pilon fracture will be conducted. Internal locking plate fixation will be compared with external frame fixation. The primary outcome and endpoint will be the Disability Rating Index (a patient self-reported assessment of physical disability) at 12 months. This will also be measured at baseline, three, six, and 24 months after randomization. Secondary outcomes include the Olerud and Molander Ankle Score (OMAS), the five-level EuroQol five-dimenison score (EQ-5D-5L), complications (including bone healing), resource use, work impact, and patient treatment preference. The acceptability of the treatments and study design to patients and health care professionals will be explored through qualitative methods.Aims
Methods
Lifestyle risk factors are thought to increase the risk of infection
after acute orthopaedic surgery but the evidence is scarce. We aimed
to investigate whether smoking, obesity and alcohol overuse are
risk factors for the development of infections after surgery for
a fracture of the ankle. We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent internal
fixation of a fracture of the ankle between 2008 and 2013. The primary
outcome was the rate of deep infection and the secondary outcome
was any surgical site infection (SSI). Associations with the risk
factors and possible confounding variables were analysed univariably
and multivariably with backwards elimination.Aims
Patients and Methods
In this retrospective cohort study, we analysed
the incidence and functional outcome of a distal tibiofibular synostosis.
Patients with an isolated AO type 44-B or C fracture of the ankle
who underwent surgical treatment between 1995 and 2007 were invited
for clinical and radiological review. The American Orthopaedic Foot
and Ankle Society score, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
score and a visual analogue score for pain were used to assess outcome. A total of 274 patients were available; the mean follow-up was
9.7 years (8 to 18). The extent of any calcification or synostosis
at the level of the distal interosseous membrane or syndesmosis
on the contemporary radiographs was defined as: no or minor calcifications
(group 1), severe calcification (group 2), or complete synostosis
(group 3). A total of 222 (81%) patients were in group 1, 37 (14%) in group
2 and 15 (5%) in group 3. There was no significant difference in
incidence between AO type 44-B and type 44-C fractures (p = 0.89).
Severe calcification or synostosis occurred in 21 patients (19%)
in whom a syndesmotic screw was used and in 31 (19%) in whom a syndesmotic screw
was not used.(p = 0.70). No significant differences were found between
the groups except for a greater reduction in mean dorsiflexion in
group 2 (p = 0.004). This is the largest study on distal tibiofibular synostosis,
and we found that a synostosis is a frequent complication of surgery
for a fracture of the ankle. Although it theoretically impairs the
range of movement of the ankle, it did not affect the outcome. Our findings suggest that synostosis of the distal tibiofibular
syndesmosis in general does not warrant treatment. Cite this article:
Most of the literature on surgical site infections
following the surgical treatment of fractures of the ankle is based
on small series of patients, focusing on diabetics or the elderly.
None have described post-operative functional scores in those patients
who develop an infection. We performed an age- and gender-matched
case–control study to identify patient- and surgery-related risk
factors for surgical site infection following open reduction and
internal fixation of a fracture of the ankle. Logistic regression
analysis was used to identify significant risk factors for infection
and to calculate odds ratios (OR). Function was assessed using the
Olerud and Molander Ankle Score. The incidence of infection was
4% (29/717) and 1.1% (8/717) were deep infections. The median ankle
score was significantly lower in the infection group compared with
the control group (60 A low incidence of infection following open reduction and internal
fixation of fractures of the ankle was observed. Both superficial
and deep infections result in lower functional scores. Cite this article:
The incidence of deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) and
pulmonary embolism (PE) is thought to be low following foot and ankle
surgery, but the routine use of chemoprophylaxis remains controversial.
This retrospective study assessed the incidence of symptomatic venous
thromboembolic (VTE) complications following a consecutive series
of 2654 patients undergoing elective foot and ankle surgery. A total
of 1078 patients received 75 mg aspirin as routine thromboprophylaxis
between 2003 and 2006 and 1576 patients received no form of chemical
thromboprophylaxis between 2007 and 2010. The overall incidence
of VTE was 0.42% (DVT, 0.27%; PE, 0.15%) with 27 patients lost to follow-up.
If these were included to create a worst case scenario, the overall
VTE rate was 1.43%. There was no apparent protective effect against
VTE by using aspirin. We conclude that the incidence of VTE following foot and ankle
surgery is very low and routine use of chemoprophylaxis does not
appear necessary for patients who are not in the high risk group
for VTE.