Cauda equina syndrome (CES) can be associated with chronic severe lower back pain and long-term autonomic dysfunction. This study assesses the recently defined core outcome set for CES in a cohort of patients using validated questionnaires. Between January 2005 and December 2019, 82 patients underwent surgical decompression for acute CES secondary to massive lumbar disc prolapse at our hospital. After review of their records, patients were included if they presented with the clinical and radiological features of CES, then classified as CES incomplete (CESI) or with painless urinary retention (CESR) in accordance with guidelines published by the British Association of Spinal Surgeons. Patients provided written consent and completed a series of questionnaires.Aims
Methods
To report the outcome of spinal deformity correction through anterior spinal fusion in wheelchair-bound patients with myelomeningocele. We reviewed 12 consecutive patients (7M:5F; mean age 12.4 years (9.2 to 16.8)) including demographic details, spinopelvic parameters, surgical correction, and perioperative data. We assessed the impact of surgery on patient outcomes using the Spina Bifida Spine Questionnaire and a qualitative questionnaire.Aims
Methods
Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) develop deposits in the spine
which may lead to vertebral compression fractures (VCFs). Our aim
was to establish which spinopelvic parameters are associated with
the greatest disability in patients with spinal myeloma and VCFs. We performed a retrospective cross-sectional review of 148 consecutive
patients (87 male, 61 female) with spinal myeloma and analysed correlations
between spinopelvic parameters and patient-reported outcome scores.
The mean age of the patients was 65.5 years (37 to 91) and the mean
number of vertebrae involved was 3.7 (1 to 15).Aims
Patients and Methods
We performed a retrospective, comparative study of elderly patients
with an increased risk from anaesthesia who had undergone either
anterior screw fixation (ASF) or halo vest immobilisation (HVI)
for a type II odontoid fracture. A total of 80 patients aged 65 years or more who had undergone
either ASF or HVI for a type II odontoid fracture between 1988 and
2013 were reviewed. There were 47 women and 33 men with a mean age
of 73 (65 to 96; standard deviation 7). All had an American Society
of Anesthesiologists score of 2 or more.Aims
Patients and Methods
Hypovitaminosis D has been identified as a common
risk factor for fragility fractures and poor fracture healing. Epidemiological
data on vitamin D deficiency have been gathered in various populations,
but the association between vertebral fragility fractures and hypovitaminosis
D, especially in males, remains unclear. The purpose of this study
was to evaluate serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OH D) in
patients presenting with vertebral fragility fractures and to determine
whether patients with a vertebral fracture were at greater risk
of hypovitaminosis D than a control population. Furthermore, we
studied the seasonal variations in the serum vitamin D levels of
tested patients in order to clarify the relationship between other
known risk factors for osteoporosis and vitamin D levels. We measured
the serum 25-OH D levels of 246 patients admitted with vertebral
fractures (105 men, 141 female, mean age 69 years, Cite this article:
We evaluated the efficacy of anterior fusion alone compared with combined anterior and posterior fusion for the treatment of degenerative cervical kyphosis. Anterior fusion alone was undertaken in 15 patients (group A) and combined anterior and posterior fusion was carried out in a further 15 (group B). The degree and maintenance of the angle of correction, the incidence of graft subsidence, degeneration at adjacent levels and the rate of fusion were assessed radiologically and clinically and the rate of complications recorded. The mean angle of correction in group B was significantly higher than in group A (p = 0.0009). The mean visual analogue scale and the neck disability index in group B was better than in group A (p = 0.043, 0.0006). The mean operation time and the blood loss in B were greater than in group A (p <
0.0001, 0.037). Pseudarthrosis, subsidence of the cage, and problems related to the hardware were more prevalent in group A than in group B (p = 0.034, 0.025, 0.013). Although the combined procedure resulted in a longer operating time and greater blood loss than with anterior fusion alone, our results suggest that for the treatment of degenerative cervical kyphosis the combined approach leads to better maintenance of sagittal alignment, a higher rate of fusion, a lower incidence of complications and a better clinical outcome.
This is a prospective randomised study comparing
the clinical and radiological outcomes of uni- and bipedicular balloon
kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression
fractures. A total of 44 patients were randomised to undergo either
uni- or bipedicular balloon kyphoplasty. Self-reported clinical
assessment using the Oswestry Disability Index, the Roland-Morris
Disability questionnaire and a visual analogue score for pain was undertaken
pre-operatively, and at three and twelve months post-operatively.
The vertebral height and kyphotic angle were measured from pre-
and post-operative radiographs. Total operating time and the incidence
of cement leakage was recorded for each group. Both uni- and bipedicular kyphoplasty groups showed significant
within-group improvements in all clinical outcomes at three months
and twelve months after surgery. However, there were no significant
differences between the groups in all clinical and radiological
outcomes. Operating time was longer in the bipedicular group (p <
0.001). The incidence of cement leakage was not significantly different
in the two groups (p = 0.09). A unipedicular technique yielded similar clinical and radiological
outcomes as bipedicular balloon kyphoplasty, while reducing the
length of the operation. We therefore encourage the use of a unipedicular
approach as the preferred surgical technique for the treatment of
osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Cite this article:
This article reviews the current knowledge of
the intervertebral disc (IVD) and its association with low back
pain (LBP). The normal IVD is a largely avascular and aneural structure
with a high water content, its nutrients mainly diffusing through
the end plates. IVD degeneration occurs when its cells die or become
dysfunctional, notably in an acidic environment. In the process
of degeneration, the IVD becomes dehydrated and vascularised, and
there is an ingrowth of nerves. Although not universally the case,
the altered physiology of the IVD is believed to precede or be associated
with many clinical symptoms or conditions including low back and/or
lower limb pain, paraesthesia, spinal stenosis and disc herniation. New treatment options have been developed in recent years. These
include biological therapies and novel surgical techniques (such
as total disc replacement), although many of these are still in
their experimental phase. Central to developing further methods
of treatment is the need for effective ways in which to assess patients
and measure their outcomes. However, significant difficulties remain
and it is therefore an appropriate time to be further investigating
the scientific basis of and treatment of LBP.
Spinal stenosis and disc herniation are the two
most frequent causes of lumbosacral nerve root compression. This
can result in muscle weakness and present with or without pain. The
difficulty when managing patients with these conditions is knowing
when surgery is better than non-operative treatment: the evidence
is controversial. Younger patients with a lesser degree of weakness
for a shorter period of time have been shown to respond better to surgical
treatment than older patients with greater weakness for longer.
However, they also constitute a group that fares better without
surgery. The main indication for surgical treatment in the management
of patients with lumbosacral nerve root compression should be pain
rather than weakness.
Between March 2000 and February 2006, we carried out a prospective study of 100 patients with a low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis (Meyerding grade II or below), who were randomised to receive a single-level and instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion with either one or two cages. The minimum follow-up was for two years. At this stage 91 patients were available for review. A total of 47 patients received one cage (group 1) and 44 two cages (group 2). The clinical and radiological outcomes of the two groups were compared. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of post-operative pain, Oswestry Disability Score, clinical results, complication rate, percentage of post-operative slip, anterior fusion rate or posterior fusion rate. On the other hand, the mean operating time was 144 minutes (100 to 240) for patients in group 1 and 167 minutes (110 to 270) for those in group 2 (p = 0.0002). The mean blood loss up to the end of the first post-operative day was 756 ml (510 to 1440) in group 1 and 817 ml (620 to 1730) in group 2 (p <
0.0001). Our results suggest that an instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion performed with either one or two cages in addition to a bone graft around the cage has a low rate of complications and a high fusion rate. The clinical outcomes were good in most cases, regardless of whether one or two cages had been used.
