Please check your email for the verification action. You may continue to use the site and you are now logged in, but you will not be able to return to the site in future until you confirm your email address.
Aims. The aim of this study was to compare the pain caused by the application
of a tourniquet after exsanguination of the upper limb with that
occurring after simple elevation. . Patients and Methods. We used 26 healthy volunteers (52 arms), each of whom acted as
their own matched control. The primary outcome measure was the total pain experienced by
each volunteer while the tourniquet was inflated for 20 minutes.
This was calculated as the area under the pain curve for each individual
subject. Secondary outcomes were pain at each time point; the total
pain experienced during the recovery phase; the ability to tolerate the
tourniquet and the time for full recovery after deflation of the
tourniquet. . Results. There was a significant difference in the area under the pain
curves in favour of exsanguination (mean difference 8.4; 95% confidence
interval (CI) 3.0 to 13.7, p = 0.004). There was no difference between
the dominant and non-dominant arms (mean difference -0.2; 95% CI
-23.2 to 22.8, p = 0.99). The area under both recovery curves were similar
(mean difference 0.7; 95% CI -6.0 to 4.6, p = 0.78). There was no
statistical difference in recovery time, the actual mean difference
being 30 seconds longer in the elevation group (p = 0.06). Conclusion. Many orthopaedic and plastic surgery procedures are done under
local anaesthetic or regional block where a bloodless field and
a motionless patient are essential. Optimising patient comfort during
surgery with the tourniquet inflated is thus a priority. This study
is useful in that it compares two common methods of preparation
of the upper limb prior to tourniquet inflation and which have not
previously been compared in this context. Following on the results of this study, we can confidently conclude
that exsanguinating the upper limb before inflating a tourniquet
is more comfortable than simply elevating the arm for patients undergoing
a procedure under local or regional block, both during the procedure
and in the recovery phase. . Take home message: Exsanguination rather than elevation is recommended
in order to minimise patient discomfort and optimise the surgical
field. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:519–25