The objective of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing surgical and non-surgical management of fractures of the proximal humerus, and to determine whether further analyses based on complexity of fracture, or the type of surgical intervention, produced disparate findings on patient outcomes. A systematic review of the literature was performed identifying all RCTs that compared surgical and non-surgical management of fractures of the proximal humerus. Meta-analysis of clinical outcomes was performed where possible. Subgroup analysis based on the type of fracture, and a sensitivity analysis based on the type of surgical intervention, were also performed.Objectives
Methods
We reviewed 101 patients with injuries of the
terminal branches of the infraclavicular brachial plexus sustained between
1997 and 2009. Four patterns of injury were identified: 1) anterior
glenohumeral dislocation (n = 55), in which the axillary and ulnar
nerves were most commonly injured, but the axillary nerve was ruptured
in only two patients (3.6%); 2) axillary nerve injury, with or without
injury to other nerves, in the absence of dislocation of the shoulder
(n = 20): these had a similar pattern of nerve involvement to those
with a known dislocation, but the axillary nerve was ruptured in
14 patients (70%); 3) displaced proximal humeral fracture (n = 15),
in which nerve injury resulted from medial displacement of the humeral
shaft: the fracture was surgically reduced in 13 patients; and 4) hyperextension
of the arm (n = 11): these were characterised by disruption of the
musculocutaneous nerve. There was variable involvement of the median
and radial nerves with the ulnar nerve being least affected. Surgical intervention is not needed in most cases of infraclavicular
injury associated with dislocation of the shoulder. Early exploration
of the nerves should be considered in patients with an axillary
nerve palsy without dislocation of the shoulder and for musculocutaneous
nerve palsy with median and/or radial nerve palsy. Urgent operation
is needed in cases of nerve injury resulting from fracture of the
humeral neck to relieve pressure on nerves.
We reviewed the outcome of 28 patients who had been treated using the Aequalis fracture prosthesis for an acute fracture of the proximal humerus at a mean follow-up of 39.3 months (24 to 63). The mean age of the patients at the time of the fracture was 66.3 years (38 to 80). The mean Constant score was 68.2 (37 to 84) for the operated shoulder, which represented 89.5% of the mean score for the uninjured side (p <
0.001). The quality of the reconstruction as shown on the immediate post-operative radiographs was categorised into three types, anatomical, acceptable, and unacceptable, depending on the position of the tuberosities relative to the prosthetic head and the humeral shaft. Anatomical reconstruction was associated with a higher mean Constant score as well as higher mean values of anterior forward elevation, abduction and external rotation than the other types, but the differences were not statistically significant (p >
0.231). A total of 18 patients had active anterior elevation ≥150°. Their mean active abduction and external rotation were 163.6° and 31.3°, respectively. In seven of the 28 patients, the mean active anterior elevation, abduction and external rotation were 130.7°, 129.2° and 22.8°, respectively. In all, 12 patients were very satisfied with the results, 12 were satisfied, two were dissatisfied and two were disappointed; 26 reported no or only mild pain while only two had moderate pain. In five patients proximal migration of the humeral head was shown on the anteroposterior radiographs of the shoulder. No evidence of loosening was found in any prosthesis.
We reviewed 39 patients with displaced three- and four-part fractures of the humerus. In 21 patients (group A) we had used an anatomical prosthesis for the humeral head and in 18 (group B) an implant designed for fractures. When followed up at a mean of 29.3 months after surgery the overall Constant score was 51.9 points; in group A it was 51.5 and in group B 52.4 points. The subjective satisfaction of the patients was assessed using a numerical rating scale and was similar in both groups. In group A complete healing of the tuberosities was found in 29% and 50% in group B. Partial integration was seen in 29% of group A and in only one patient in group B, while resorption was noted in 43% of group A and 44% of group B. The functional outcome was significantly better in patients with complete or partial healing of the tuberosities (p = 0.022). The specific trauma prosthesis did not lead to better healing of the tuberosities. The difference in clinical outcome obtained by the two designs did not reach statistical significance.