This study aimed to investigate the role of quantitative histological
analysis in the diagnosis of fracture-related infection (FRI). The clinical features, microbiology culture results, and histological
analysis in 156 surgically treated nonunions were used to stratify
the likelihood of associated infection. There were 64 confirmed
infected nonunions (one or more confirmatory criteria: pus, sinus,
and bacterial growth in two or more samples), 66 aseptic nonunions
(no confirmatory criteria), and 26 possibly infected nonunions (pathogen
identified from a single specimen and no confirmatory criteria).
The histological inflammatory response was assessed by average neutrophil
polymorph (NPs) counts per high-power field (HPF) and compared with
the established diagnosis.Aims
Patients and Methods
Prospective data on hip fracture from 3686 patients at a United Kingdom teaching hospital were analysed to investigate the risk factors, financial costs and outcomes associated with deep or superficial wound infections after hip fracture surgery. In 1.2% (41) of patients a deep wound infection developed, and 1.1% (39) had a superficial wound infection. A total of 57 of 80 infections (71.3%) were due to No statistically significant pre-operative risk factors were detected. Length of stay, cost of treatment and pre-discharge mortality all significantly increased with deep wound infection. The one-year mortality was 30%, and this increased to 50% in those who developed an infection (p <
0.001). A deep infection resulted in doubled operative costs, tripled investigation costs and quadrupled ward costs. MRSA infection increased costs, length of stay, and pre-discharge mortality compared with non-MRSA infection.
