The modern prevalence of primary tumours causing metastatic bone disease is ill-defined in the oncological literature. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to identify the prevalence of primary tumours in the setting of metastatic bone disease, as well as reported rates of pathological fracture, postoperative complications, 90-day mortality, and 360-day mortality for each primary tumour subtype. The Premier Healthcare Database was queried to identify all patients who were diagnosed with metastatic bone disease from January 2015 to December 2020. The prevalence of all primary tumour subtypes was tabulated. Rates of long bone pathological fracture, 90-day mortality, and 360-day mortality following surgical treatment of pathological fracture were assessed for each primary tumour subtype. Patient characteristics and postoperative outcomes were analyzed based upon whether patients had impending fractures treated prophylactically versus treated completed fractures.Aims
Methods
The incidence of bone metastases is between 20% to 75% depending on the type of cancer. As treatment improves, the number of patients who need surgical intervention is increasing. Identifying patients with a shorter life expectancy would allow surgical intervention with more durable reconstructions to be targeted to those most likely to benefit. While previous scoring systems have focused on surgical and oncological factors, there is a need to consider comorbidities and the physiological state of the patient, as these will also affect outcome. The primary aim of this study was to create a scoring system to estimate survival time in patients with bony metastases and to determine which factors may adversely affect this. This was a retrospective study which included all patients who had presented for surgery with metastatic bone disease. The data collected included patient, surgical, and oncological variables. Univariable and multivariable analysis identified which factors were associated with a survival time of less than six months and less than one year. A model to predict survival based on these factors was developed using Cox regression.Aims
Methods
There is currently no consensus about the mean
volume of blood lost during spinal tumour surgery and surgery for metastatic
spinal disease. We conducted a systematic review of papers published
in the English language between 31 January 1992 and 31 January 2012.
Only papers that clearly presented blood loss data in spinal surgery
for metastatic disease were included. The random effects model was
used to obtain the pooled estimate of mean blood loss. We selected 18 papers, including six case series, ten retrospective
reviews and two prospective studies. Altogether, there were 760
patients who had undergone spinal tumour surgery and surgery for
metastatic spinal disease. The pooled estimate of peri-operative
blood loss was 2180 ml (95% confidence interval 1805 to 2554) with catastrophic
blood loss as high as 5000 ml, which is rare. Aside from two studies
that reported large amounts of mean blood loss (>
5500 ml), the
resulting funnel plot suggested an absence of publication bias.
This was confirmed by Egger’s test, which did not show any small-study
effects
(p = 0.119). However, there was strong evidence of heterogeneity
between studies (I2 = 90%; p <
0.001). Spinal surgery for metastatic disease is associated with significant
blood loss and the possibility of catastrophic blood loss. There
is a need to establish standardised methods of calculating and reporting
this blood loss. Analysis should include assessment by area of the
spine, primary pathology and nature of surgery so that the amount
of blood loss can be predicted. Consideration should be given to
autotransfusion in these patients. Cite this article:
