Instability after arthroplasty of the shoulder
is difficult to correct surgically. Soft-tissue procedures and revision surgery
using unconstrained anatomical components are associated with a
high rate of failure. The purpose of this study was to determine
the results of revision of an unstable anatomical shoulder arthroplasty
to a reverse design prosthesis. Between 2004 and 2007, 33 unstable
anatomical shoulder arthroplasties were revised to a reverse design.
The mean age of the patients was 71 years (53 to 86) and their mean
follow-up was 42 months (25 to 71). The mean time to revision was
26 months (4 to 164). Pain scores improved significantly (pre-operative
visual analogue scale (VAS) of 7.2 (. sd. 1.6); most recent
VAS 2.2 (. sd. 1.9); p = 0.001). There was a statistically
significant increase in mean active forward elevation from 40.2°
(. sd. 27.3) to 97.0° (. sd. 36.2) (p = 0.001). There
was no significant difference in internal (p = 0.93) or external
rotation (p = 0.40). Radiological findings included notching in
five shoulders (15%) and heterotopic ossification of the inferior
capsular region in three (9%). At the last follow-up 31 shoulders
(94%) were stable. The remaining two shoulders dislocated at 2.5
weeks and three months post-operatively, respectively. According
to the Neer rating system, there were 13 excellent (40%), ten satisfactory
(30%) and ten unsatisfactory results (30%). Revision of hemiarthroplasty
or anatomical
We compared six patients with a mean age of 70 years (49 to 80) with severe bilateral, painful glenohumeral joint destruction who underwent a single-stage bilateral
There are no long-term published results on the survival of a third-generation cemented
This study was performed to review the safety and outcome of
We describe the longer term clinical and radiological findings in a prospectively followed series of 49 rheumatoid patients (58 shoulders) who had undergone Neer II
Our aim in this prospective study was to evaluate the outcome of
There are theoretical and practical advantages to modular rather than monoblock designs of prostheses for shoulder arthroplasty, but there are no reported studies which specifically compare the clinical and radiological results of their use. We have compared the results of unconstrained
There is little information about the management
of peri-prosthetic fracture of the humerus after total shoulder replacement
(TSR). This is a retrospective review of 22 patients who underwent
a revision of their original shoulder replacement for peri-prosthetic
fracture of the humerus with bone loss and/or loose components.
There were 20 women and two men with a mean age of 75 years (61
to 90) and a mean follow-up 42 months (12 to 91): 16 of these had
undergone a previous revision TSR. Of the 22 patients, 12 were treated
with a long-stemmed humeral component that bypassed the fracture.
All their fractures united after a mean of 27 weeks (13 to 94).
Eight patients underwent resection of the proximal humerus with
endoprosthetic replacement to the level of the fracture. Two patients
were managed with a clam-shell prosthesis that retained the original
components. The mean Oxford shoulder score (OSS) of the original
TSRs before peri-prosthetic fracture was 33 (14 to 48). The mean
OSS after revision for fracture was 25 (9 to 31). Kaplan-Meier survival
using re-intervention for any reason as the endpoint was 91% (95%
confidence interval (CI) 68 to 98) and 60% (95% CI 30 to 80) at
one and five years, respectively. There were two revisions for dislocation of the humeral head,
one open reduction for modular humeral component dissociation, one
internal fixation for nonunion, one trimming of a prominent screw
and one re-cementation for aseptic loosening complicated by infection,
ultimately requiring excision arthroplasty. Two patients sustained
nerve palsies. Revision TSR after a peri-prosthetic humeral fracture associated
with bone loss and/or loose components is a salvage procedure that
can provide a stable platform for elbow and hand function. Good
rates of union can be achieved using a stem that bypasses the fracture.
There is a high rate of complications and function is not as good as
with the original replacement.
We reviewed 80 shoulders (77 patients) at a mean follow-up of 44 months after insertion of a Grammont inverted shoulder prosthesis. Three implants had failed and had been revised. The mean Constant score had increased from 22.6 points pre-operatively to 65.6 points at review. In 96% of these shoulders there was no or only minimal pain. The mean active forward elevation increased from 73° to 138°. The integrity of teres minor is essential for the recovery of external rotation and significantly influenced the Constant score. Five cases of aseptic loosening of the glenoid and seven of dissociation of the glenoid component were noted. This study confirms the promising early results obtained with the inverted prosthesis in the treatment of a cuff-tear arthropathy. It should be considered in the treatment of osteoarthritis with a massive tear of the cuff but should be reserved for elderly patients.
The aim of this study was to compare a third-generation
cementing procedure for glenoid components with a new technique
for cement pressurisation. In 20 pairs of scapulae, 20 keeled and
20 pegged glenoid components were implanted using either a third-generation
cementing technique (group 1) or a new pressuriser (group 2). Cement penetration
was measured by three-dimensional (3D) analysis of micro-CT scans.
The mean 3D depth of penetration of the cement was significantly
greater in group 2 (p <
0.001). The mean thickness of the cement
mantle for keeled glenoids was 2.50 mm (2.0 to 3.3) in group 1 and
5.18 mm (4.4 to 6.1) in group 2, and for pegged glenoids it was 1.72 mm
(0.9 to 2.3) in group 1 and 5.63 mm (3.6 to 6.4) in group 2. A cement
mantle <
2 mm was detected less frequently in group 2 (p <
0.001). Using the cement pressuriser the proportion of cement mantles
<
2 mm was significantly reduced compared with the third-generation
cementing technique.
We have investigated the mid-term outcome of
This study aimed to define the histopathology of degenerated humeral head cartilage and synovial inflammation of the glenohumeral joint in patients with omarthrosis (OmA) and cuff tear arthropathy (CTA). Additionally, the potential of immunohistochemical tissue biomarkers in reflecting the degeneration status of humeral head cartilage was evaluated. Specimens of the humeral head and synovial tissue from 12 patients with OmA, seven patients with CTA, and four body donors were processed histologically for examination using different histopathological scores. Osteochondral sections were immunohistochemically stained for collagen type I, collagen type II, collagen neoepitope C1,2C, collagen type X, and osteocalcin, prior to semiquantitative analysis. Matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-1, MMP-3, and MMP-13 levels were analyzed in synovial fluid using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).Aims
Methods
In a prospective study between 2000 and 2005, 22 patients with primary osteoarthritis of the shoulder had a
We hypothesised that a large acromial cover with
an upwardly tilted glenoid fossa would be associated with degenerative
rotator cuff tears (RCTs), and conversely, that a short acromion
with an inferiorly inclined glenoid would be associated with glenohumeral
osteoarthritis (OA). This hypothesis was tested using a new radiological parameter,
the critical shoulder angle (CSA), which combines the measurements
of inclination of the glenoid and the lateral extension of the acromion
(the acromion index). The CSA was measured on standardised radiographs of three groups:
1) a control group of 94 asymptomatic shoulders with normal rotator
cuffs and no OA; 2) a group of 102 shoulders with MRI-documented
full-thickness RCTs without OA; and 3) a group of 102 shoulders
with primary OA and no RCTs noted during
We report the long-term clinical and radiological outcomes of the Aequalis
Between 1976 and 2004, 38 revision arthroplasties (35 patients) were performed for aseptic loosening of the humeral component. The mean interval from primary arthroplasty to revision was 7.1 years (0.4 to 16.6). A total of 35 shoulders (32 patients) were available for review at a mean follow-up of seven years (2 to 19.3). Pre-operatively, 34 patients (97%) had moderate or severe pain; at final follow-up, 29 (83%) had no or only mild pain (p <
0.0001). The mean active abduction improved from 88° to 107° (p <
0.01); and the mean external rotation from 37° to 46° (p = 0.27). Excellent or satisfactory results were achieved in 25 patients (71%) according to the modified Neer rating system. Humeral components were cemented in 29, with ingrowth implants used in nine cases. There were 19 of standard length and 17 were longer (two were custom replacements and are not included). Bone grafting was required for defects in 11 humeri. Only two glenoid components were left unrevised. Intra-operative complications included cement extrusion in eight cases, fracture of the shaft of the humerus is two and of the tuberosity in four. There were four re-operations, one for recurrent humeral loosening, with 89% survival free of re-operations at ten years. Revision surgery for aseptic loosening of the humeral component provides reliable pain relief and modest improvement of movement, although there is a substantial risk of intra-operative complications. Revision to a
We studied the stability of cemented all-polyethylene keeled glenoid components by radiostereometric analysis (RSA) in 16 shoulders which had received a
The incidence of loosening of a cemented glenoid componentin
We have undertaken a prospective clinical and radiological analysis of 124 shoulder arthroplasties (113 patients) carried out for osteoarthritis. The clinical results showed improvement in the absolute Constant score and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score of 22 and 43, respectively. Both were statistically significant (p <
0.001). There was no significant difference in the scores after hemiarthroplasty and total arthroplasty in those patients with an intact rotator cuff. When revision was used as the end-point for survival at ten years, survival of 86%, or 90% if glenoid components made of Hylamer sterilised in air were omitted, was obtained in primary osteoarthritis. The most common cause for revision in the hemiarthroplasty group was glenoid pain at a mean of 1.5 years; in the total arthroplasty group it was loosening of the glenoid at a mean of 4.5 years. Analysis of pre-operative factors showed that the risk of gross loosening of the glenoid increased threefold when there was evidence of erosion of the glenoid at operation. Shoulder arthroplasty should not be delayed once symptomatic osteoarthritis has been established and should be undertaken before failure of the cuff or erosion of the glenoid are present.