Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Results per page:
The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 96-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1644 - 1648
1 Dec 2014
Abdel MP Pulido L Severson EP Hanssen AD

Instability in flexion after total knee replacement (TKR) typically occurs as a result of mismatched flexion and extension gaps. The goals of this study were to identify factors leading to instability in flexion, the degree of correction, determined radiologically, required at revision surgery, and the subsequent clinical outcomes. Between 2000 and 2010, 60 TKRs in 60 patients underwent revision for instability in flexion associated with well-fixed components. There were 33 women (55%) and 27 men (45%); their mean age was 65 years (43 to 82). Radiological measurements and the Knee Society score (KSS) were used to assess outcome after revision surgery. The mean follow-up was 3.6 years (2 to 9.8). Decreased condylar offset (p < 0.001), distalisation of the joint line (p < 0.001) and increased posterior tibial slope (p < 0.001) contributed to instability in flexion and required correction at revision to regain stability. The combined mean correction of posterior condylar offset and joint line resection was 9.5 mm, and a mean of 5° of posterior tibial slope was removed. At the most recent follow-up, there was a significant improvement in the mean KSS for the knee and function (both p < 0.001), no patient reported instability and no patient underwent further surgery for instability.

The following step-wise approach is recommended: reduction of tibial slope, correction of malalignment, and improvement of condylar offset. Additional joint line elevation is needed if the above steps do not equalise the flexion and extension gaps.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:1644–8.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 99-B, Issue 3 | Pages 337 - 343
1 Mar 2017
Ahmed I Salmon L Roe J Pinczewski L

Aims

The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term clinical and radiological outcome of patients who suffer recurrent injuries to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) after reconstruction and require revision surgery.

Patients and Methods

From a consecutive series of 200 patients who underwent primary reconstruction following rupture of the ACL, we identified 36 who sustained a further rupture, 29 of whom underwent revision surgery. Patients were reviewed prospectively at one, two, seven, 15 and about 20 years after their original surgery. Primary outcome measures were the number of further ruptures, the posterior tibial slope (PTS), and functional and radiological outcomes. These were compared with a gender and age matched cohort of patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction only.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 98-B, Issue 1_Supple_A | Pages 84 - 88
1 Jan 2016
Vince K

The term mid-flexion instability has entered the orthopaedic literature as a concept, but has not been confirmed as a distinct clinical entity. The term is used freely, sometimes as a synonym for flexion instability. However, the terms need to be clearly separated. A cadaver study published in 1990 associated joint line elevation with decreased stability at many angles of flexion, but that model was not typical of clinical scenarios. The literature is considered and it is proposed that the more common entity of an uncorrected flexion contracture after a measured resection arthroplasty technique is more likely to produce clinical findings that suggest instability mid-flexion.

It is proposed that the clinical scenario encountered is generalised instability, with the appearance of stability in full extension from tight posterior structures.

This paper seeks to clarify whether mid-flexion instability exists as an entity distinct from other commonly recognised forms of instability.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B(1 Suppl A):84–8.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 89-B, Issue 6 | Pages 761 - 765
1 Jun 2007
Barnett AJ Gardner ROE Lankester BJA Wakeley CJ Eldridge JDJ

We retrospectively analysed the MR scans of 25 patients with patellofemoral dysplasia and ten control subjects, to assess whether there was any change in the morphology of the patella along its vertical length. Ratios were calculated comparing the size of the cartilaginous and subchondral osseous surfaces of the lateral and medial facets. We also classified the morphology using the scoring systems of Baumgartl and Wiberg. There were 18 females and seven males with a mean age of 20.2 years (10 to 29) with dysplasia and two females and eight males with a mean age of 20.4 years (10 to 29) in the control group.

In the patient group there was a significant difference in morphology from proximal to distal for the cartilaginous (Analysis of variance (ANOVA) p = 0.004) and subchondral osseous surfaces (ANOVA, p = 0.002). In the control group there was no significant difference for either the cartilaginous (ANOVA, p = 0.391) or the subchondral osseous surface (ANOVA, p = 0.526).

Our study has shown that in the dysplastic patellofemoral articulation the medial facet of the patella becomes smaller in relation to the lateral facet from proximal to distal. MRI is needed to define clearly the cartilaginous and osseous morphology of the patella before surgery is considered for patients with patellofemoral dysplasia.