Arthroplasty for end-stage hallux rigidus (HR) is controversial. Arthrodesis remains the gold standard for surgical treatment, although is not without its complications, with rates of up to 10% for nonunion, 14% for reoperation and 10% for metatarsalgia. The aim of this study was to analyze the outcome of a double-stemmed silastic implant (Wright-Medical, Memphis, Tennessee, USA) for patients with end-stage HR. We conducted a retrospective review of 108 consecutive implants in 76 patients, between January 2005 and December 2016, with a minimum follow-up of two years. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 61.6 years (42 to 84). There were 104 females and four males. Clinical, radiological, patient reported outcome measures (PROMS) data, a visual analogue score (VAS) for pain, and satisfaction scores were collected.Aims
Methods
In a retrospective study we compared 32 HINTEGRA
total ankle replacements (TARs) and 35 Mobility TARs performed between
July 2005 and May 2010, with a minimum follow-up of two years. The
mean follow-up for the HINTEGRA group was 53 months (24 to 76) and
for the Mobility group was 34 months (24 to 45). All procedures
were performed by a single surgeon. There was no significant difference between the two groups with
regard to the mean AOFAS score, visual analogue score for pain or
range of movement of the ankle at the latest follow-up. Most radiological
measurements did not differ significantly between the two groups.
However, the most common grade of heterotopic ossification (HO)
was grade 3 in the HINTEGRA group (10 of 13 TARs, 76.9%) and grade
2 in the Mobility group (four of seven TARs, 57.1%) (p = 0.025).
Although HO was more frequent in the HINTEGRA group (40.6%) than
in the Mobility group (20.0%), this was not statistically significant
(p = 0.065).The difference in peri-operative complications between
the two groups was not significant, but intra-operative medial malleolar
fractures occurred in four (11.4%) in the Mobility group; four (12.5%)
in the HINTEGRA group and one TAR (2.9%) in the Mobility group failed
(p = 0.185). Cite this article:
