Metal and ceramic humeral head bearing surfaces are available choices in anatomical shoulder arthroplasties. Wear studies have shown superior performance of ceramic heads, however comparison of clinical outcomes according to bearing surface in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and hemiarthroplasty (HA) is limited. This study aimed to compare the rates of revision and reoperation following metal and ceramic humeral head TSA and HA using data from the National Joint Registry (NJR), which collects data from England, Wales, Northern Ireland, Isle of Man and the States of Guernsey. NJR shoulder arthroplasty records were linked to Hospital Episode Statistics and the National Mortality Register. TSA and HA performed for osteoarthritis (OA) in patients with an intact rotator cuff were included. Metal and ceramic humeral head prostheses were matched within separate TSA and HA groups using propensity scores based on 12 and 11 characteristics, respectively. The primary outcome was time to first revision and the secondary outcome was non-revision reoperation.Aims
Methods
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) reliably improves shoulder pain and function for a variety of indications. However, the safety and efficacy of RSA in elderly patients is largely unknown. The purpose of this study was to report the mortality, morbidity, complications, reoperations, and outcomes of primary RSA in patients aged > 80 years. Between 2004 and 2013, 242 consecutive primary RSAs were performed in patients aged > 80 years (mean 83.3 years (Aims
Patients and Methods
We assessed the clinical results, radiographic
outcomes and complications of patients undergoing total shoulder replacement
(TSR) for osteoarthritis with concurrent repair of a full-thickness
rotator cuff tear. Between 1996 and 2010, 45 of 932 patients (4.8%)
undergoing TSR for osteoarthritis underwent rotator cuff repair.
The final study group comprised 33 patients with a mean follow-up
of 4.7 years (3 months to 13 years). Tears were classified into small
(10), medium (14), large (9) or massive (0). On a scale of 1 to
5, pain decreased from a mean of 4.7 to 1.7 (p = <
0.0001), the
mean forward elevation improved from 99° to 139° (p = <
0.0001),
and the mean external rotation improved from 20° (0° to 75°) to
49° (20° to 80°) (p = <
0.0001). The improvement in elevation
was greater in those with a small tear (p = 0.03). Radiographic
evidence of instability developed in six patients with medium or
large tears, indicating lack of rotator cuff healing. In all, six
glenoid components, including one with instability, were radiologically
at risk of loosening. Complications were noted in five patients,
all with medium or large tears; four of these had symptomatic instability
and one sustained a late peri-prosthetic fracture. Four patients
(12%) required further surgery, three with instability and one with
a peri-prosthetic humeral fracture. Consideration should be given to performing rotator cuff repair
for stable shoulders during anatomical TSR, but reverse replacement
should be considered for older, less active patients with larger
tears. Cite this article:
