To compare complication-related reoperation rates following primary arthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) We identified patients aged 50 years and over, who sustained a PHF between 2004 and 2015, from linkable datasets. We used intervention codes to identify patients treated with initial ORIF or arthroplasty, and those treated with ORIF who returned for revision arthroplasty within two years. We used multilevel logistic regression to compare reoperations between groups.Aims
Patients and Methods
To prevent insufficiency of the triceps after
total elbow arthroplasty, we have, since 2008, used a triceps-sparing ulnar
approach. This study evaluates the clinical results and post-operative
alignment of the prosthesis using this approach. We reviewed 25 elbows in 23 patients. There were five men and
18 women with a mean age of 69 years (54 to 83). There were 18 elbows
with rheumatoid arthritis, six with a fracture or pseudoarthrosis
and one elbow with osteoarthritis. Post-operative complications included one intra-operative fracture,
one elbow with heterotopic ossification, one transient ulnar nerve
palsy, and one elbow with skin necrosis, but no elbow was affected
by insufficiency of the triceps. Patients were followed for a mean of 42 months (24 to 77). The
mean post-operative Japanese Orthopaedic Association Elbow Score
was 90.8 (51 to 100) and the mean Mayo Elbow Performance score 93.8
(65 to 100). The mean post-operative flexion/extension of the elbow
was 135°/-8°. The Manual Muscle Testing score of the triceps was
5 in 23 elbows and 2 in two elbows (one patient). The mean alignment
of the implants examined by 3D-CT was 2.8° pronation (standard deviation
( The triceps-sparing ulnar approach allows satisfactory alignment
of the implants, is effective in preventing post-operative triceps
insufficiency, and gives satisfactory short-term results. Cite this article: 2015;97-B:1096–1101.
Unlinked, linked and convertible total elbow
arthroplasties (TEAs) are currently available. This study is the
first to report the clinical results of the convertible Latitude
TEA. This was a retrospective study of a consecutive cohort of 63
patients (69 primary TEAs) with a mean age of 60 years (23 to 87).
Between 2006 and 2008 a total of 19 men and 50 women underwent surgery.
The mean follow-up was 43 months (8 to 84). The range of movement,
function and pain all improved six months post-operatively and either
continued to improve slightly or reached a plateau thereafter. The
complication rate is similar to that reported for other TEA systems.
No loosening was seen. Remarkable is the disengagement of the radial
head component in 13 TEAs (31%) with a radial head component implanted. Implantation of both the linked and the unlinked versions of
the Latitude TEA results in improvement of function and decreased
pain, and shows high patient satisfaction at mid-term follow-up. Cite this article:
