Aims. To determine whether there is any difference in infection rate
at 90 days between trauma operations performed in
Factors associated with high mortality rates in geriatric hip fracture patients are frequently unmodifiable. Time to surgery, however, might be a modifiable factor of interest to optimize clinical outcomes after hip fracture surgery. This study aims to determine the influence of postponement of surgery due to non-medical reasons on clinical outcomes in acute hip fracture surgery. This observational cohort study enrolled consecutively admitted patients with a proximal femoral fracture, for which surgery was performed between 1 January 2018 and 11 January 2021 in two level II trauma teaching hospitals. Patients with medical indications to postpone surgery were excluded. A total of 1,803 patients were included, of whom 1,428 had surgery < 24 hours and 375 had surgery ≥ 24 hours after admission.Aims
Methods
A fracture of the hip is the most common serious orthopaedic
injury, and surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most significant
complications, resulting in increased mortality, prolonged hospital
stay and often the need for further surgery. Our aim was to determine
whether high dose dual antibiotic impregnated bone cement decreases the
rate of infection. A quasi-randomised study of 848 patients with an intracapsular
fracture of the hip was conducted in one large teaching hospital
on two sites. All were treated with a hemiarthroplasty. A total
of 448 patients received low dose single-antibiotic impregnated
cement (control group) and 400 patients received high dose dual-antibiotic impregnated
cement (intervention group). The primary outcome measure was deep
SSI at one year after surgery.Aims
Patients and Methods
Surgical site infection can be a devastating complication of
hemiarthroplasty of the hip, when performed in elderly patients
with a displaced fracture of the femoral neck. It results in a prolonged
stay in hospital, a poor outcome and increased costs. Many studies
have identified risk and prognostic factors for deep infection.
However, most have combined the rates of infection following total
hip arthroplasty and internal fixation as well as hemiarthroplasty, despite
the fact that they are different entities. The aim of this study
was to clarify the risk and prognostic factors causing deep infection
after hemiarthroplasty alone. Data were extracted from a prospective hip fracture database
and completed by retrospective review of the hospital records. A
total of 916 patients undergoing a hemiarthroplasty in two level
II trauma teaching hospitals between 01 January 2011 and
01 May 2016 were included. We analysed the potential peri-operative
risk factors with univariable and multivariable logistic regression
analysis.Aims
Patients and Methods
Prospective data on hip fracture from 3686 patients at a United Kingdom teaching hospital were analysed to investigate the risk factors, financial costs and outcomes associated with deep or superficial wound infections after hip fracture surgery. In 1.2% (41) of patients a deep wound infection developed, and 1.1% (39) had a superficial wound infection. A total of 57 of 80 infections (71.3%) were due to No statistically significant pre-operative risk factors were detected. Length of stay, cost of treatment and pre-discharge mortality all significantly increased with deep wound infection. The one-year mortality was 30%, and this increased to 50% in those who developed an infection (p <
0.001). A deep infection resulted in doubled operative costs, tripled investigation costs and quadrupled ward costs. MRSA infection increased costs, length of stay, and pre-discharge mortality compared with non-MRSA infection.
