The combination of an irreparable tear of the rotator cuff and destructive arthritis of the shoulder joint may cause severe pain, disability and loss of independence in the aged. Standard anatomical shoulder replacements depend on a functioning rotator cuff, and hence may fail in the presence of tears in the cuff. Many designs of non-anatomical constrained or semi-constrained prostheses have been developed for cuff tear arthropathy, but have proved unsatisfactory and were abandoned. The DePuy Delta III reverse prosthesis, designed by Grammont, medialises and stabilises the centre of rotation of the shoulder joint and has shown early promise. This study evaluated the mid-term clinical and radiological results of this arthroplasty in a consecutive series of 50 shoulders in 43 patients with a painful pseudoparalysis due to an
Surgical repair of posterosuperior rotator cuff
tears has a poorer outcome and a higher rate of failure compared
with repairs of supraspinatus tears. In this prospective cohort
study 28 consecutive patients with an
Reverse total shoulder replacement (RTSR) depends
on adequate deltoid function for a successful outcome. However, the
anterior deltoid and/or axillary nerve may be damaged due to prior
procedures or injury. The purpose of this study was to determine
the compensatory muscle forces required for scapular plane elevation
following RTSR when the anterior deltoid is deficient. The soft
tissues were removed from six cadaver shoulders, except for tendon
attachments. After implantation of the RTSR, the shoulders were
mounted on a custom-made shoulder simulator to determine the mean
force in each muscle required to achieve 30° and 60° of scapular
plane elevation. Two conditions were tested: 1) Control with an
absent supraspinatus and infraspinatus; and 2) Control with anterior
deltoid deficiency. Anterior deltoid deficiency resulted in a mean
increase of 195% in subscapularis force at 30° when compared with
the control (p = 0.02). At 60°, the subscapularis force increased
a mean of 82% (p <
0.001) and the middle deltoid force increased
a mean of 26% (p = 0.04). Scapular plane elevation may still be possible following an RTSR
in the setting of anterior deltoid deficiency. When the anterior
deltoid is deficient, there is a compensatory increase in the force
required by the subscapularis and middle deltoid. Attempts to preserve
the subscapularis, if present, might maximise post-operative function.
Latissimus dorsi tendon transfer (LDTT) is technically
challenging. In order to clarify the local structural anatomy, we undertook
a morphometric study using six complete cadavers (12 shoulders).
Measurements were made from the tendon to the nearby neurovascular
structures with the arm in two positions: flexed and internally
rotated, and adducted in neutral rotation. The tendon was then transferred
and measurements were taken from the edge of the tendon to a reference
point on the humeral head in order to assess the effect of a novel
two-stage release on the excursion of the tendon. With the shoulder flexed and internally rotated, the mean distances
between the superior tendon edge and the radial nerve, brachial
artery, axillary nerve and posterior circumflex artery were 30 mm
(26 to 34), 28 mm (17 to 39), 21 mm (12 to 28) and 15 mm (10 to
21), respectively. The mean distance between the inferior tendon
edge and the radial nerve, brachial artery and profunda brachii
artery was 18 mm (8 to 27), 22 mm (15 to 32) and 14 mm (7 to 21), respectively.
Moving the arm to a neutral position reduced these distances. A
mean of 15 mm (8 to 21) was gained from a standard soft-tissue release,
and 32 mm (20 to 45) from an extensile release. These figures help to define further the structural anatomy of
this region and the potential for transfer of the latissimus dorsi
tendon. Cite this article:
The outcome of an anatomical shoulder replacement
depends on an intact rotator cuff. In 1981 Grammont designed a novel
large-head reverse shoulder replacement for patients with cuff deficiency.
Such has been the success of this replacement that it has led to
a rapid expansion of the indications. We performed a systematic
review of the literature to evaluate the functional outcome of each
indication for the reverse shoulder replacement. Secondary outcome
measures of range of movement, pain scores and complication rates
are also presented.