Aims. We compared the outcome of total hip arthroplasty (THA) in obese
patients who previously underwent bariatric surgery and those who
did not, in a matched cohort study. Patients and Methods. There were 47 THAs in the bariatric group (42 patients), and
94 THAs in the comparison group (92 patients). The mean age of the
patients was 57 years in both groups (24 to 79) and 57% of the patients
in both groups were women. The mean time between bariatric surgery
and THA was five years (four months to 12 years) in the bariatric group.
The mean follow-up after THA was three years (2 to 9). . Results. The mean BMI improved from 49.7 kg/m. 2. (35 to 75) prior
to bariatric surgery to 35.3 kg/m. 2 . (21 to 49) at the
time of THA (p <
0.001). Patients in the comparison group had
an increased risk of re-operation (Hazard Ratio (HR) 3.2; 95% confidence
intervals (CI) 1.3 to 9.5, p = 0.01) and revision (HR 5.4; 95% CI
1.5 to 34.5, p = 0.01) when compared with the bariatric group. Conclusion. Patients had a dramatic improvement in BMI after bariatric surgery
and those with
The August 2024 Knee Roundup. 360. looks at: Calcification’s role in knee osteoarthritis: implications for surgical decision-making; Lower complication rates and shorter lengths of hospital stay with technology-assisted total knee arthroplasty; Revision surgery: the hidden burden on surgeons; Are preoperative weight loss interventions worthwhile?; Total knee arthroplasty with or without
C.D. Watts, J.R. Martin, M. T. Houdek, M. P. Abdel, D. G.Lewallen, M. J. Taunton
The purpose of this study was to determine the association between prior sleeve gastrectomy in patients undergoing primary total hip and knee arthroplasty, and 90-day complications, incidence of revision arthroplasty, and patient-reported outcome scores at final follow-up. This is a retrospective, single-centre analysis. Patients undergoing primary hip or knee arthroplasty with a prior sleeve gastrectomy were eligible for inclusion (n = 80 patients). A morbidly obese control group was established from the same institutional registry using a 1:2 match, for cases:controls with arthroplasty based on propensity score using age, sex, pre-sleeve gastrectomy BMI, Current Procedural Terminology code to identify anatomical location, and presurgical haemoglobin A1C. Outcomes included 90-day complications, incidence of revision arthroplasty, and patient-reported outcome scores at final follow-up. Multivariable logistic regressions evaluated associations of underlying preoperative demographic and treatment characteristics with outcomes.Aims
Methods
Obesity is a global epidemic of 2.1 billion people and a well known cause of osteoarthritis. Joint replacement in the obese attracts more complications, poorer outcomes and higher revision rates. It is a reversible condition and the fundamental principles of dealing with reversible medical conditions prior to elective total joint replacement should apply to obesity. The dilemma for orthopaedic surgeons is when to offer surgery in the face of a reversible condition, which if treated may obviate joint replacement and reduce the risk and severity of obesity related disease in both the medical arena and the field of orthopaedics.