Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 20 of 239
Results per page:
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 53-B, Issue 3 | Pages 571 - 571
1 Aug 1971
James JIP


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 88-B, Issue 5 | Pages 699 - 699
1 May 2006
Bannister G


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 37-B, Issue 1 | Pages 6 - 7
1 Feb 1955


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 83-B, Issue 4 | Pages 482 - 485
1 May 2001
Wakelin S Oliver CW


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 34-B, Issue 1 | Pages 3 - 7
1 Feb 1952













Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 12, Issue 1 | Pages 5 - 7
1 Feb 2023
Karthikappallil D


Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 2, Issue 9 | Pages 705 - 709
1 Sep 2021
Wright J Timms A Fugazzotto S Goodier D Calder P

Aims

Patients undergoing limb reconstruction surgery often face a challenging and lengthy process to complete their treatment journey. The majority of existing outcome measures do not adequately capture the patient-reported outcomes relevant to this patient group in a single measure. Following a previous systematic review, the Stanmore Limb Reconstruction Score (SLRS) was designed with the intent to address this need for an effective instrument to measure patient-reported outcomes in limb reconstruction patients. We aim to assess the face validity of this score in a pilot study.

Methods

The SLRS was designed following structured interviews with several groups including patients who have undergone limb reconstruction surgery, limb reconstruction surgeons, specialist nurses, and physiotherapists. This has subsequently undergone further adjustment for language and clarity. The score was then trialled on ten patients who had undergone limb reconstruction surgery, with subsequent structured questioning to understand the perceived suitability of the score.



The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 101-B, Issue 7 | Pages 808 - 816
1 Jul 2019
Eftekhary N Shimmin A Lazennec JY Buckland A Schwarzkopf R Dorr LD Mayman D Padgett D Vigdorchik J

There remains confusion in the literature with regard to the spinopelvic relationship, and its contribution to ideal acetabular component position. Critical assessment of the literature has been limited by use of conflicting terminology and definitions of new concepts that further confuse the topic. In 2017, the concept of a Hip-Spine Workgroup was created with the first meeting held at the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons Annual Meeting in 2018. The goal of this workgroup was to first help standardize terminology across the literature so that as a topic, multiple groups could produce literature that is immediately understandable and applicable. This consensus review from the Hip-Spine Workgroup aims to simplify the spinopelvic relationship, offer hip surgeons a concise summary of available literature, and select common terminology approved by both hip surgeons and spine surgeons for future research. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:808–816