The LockDown device (previously called Surgilig)
is a braided polyester mesh which is mostly used to reconstruct the
dislocated acromioclavicular joint. More than 11 000 have been implanted
worldwide. Little is known about the tissue reaction to the device
nor to its wear products when implanted in an extra-articular site
in humans. This is of importance as an adverse immunological reaction
could result in osteolysis or damage to the local tissues, thereby affecting
the longevity of the implant. We analysed the histology of five LockDown implants retrieved
from five patients over the last seven years by one of the senior
authors. Routine analysis was carried out in all five cases and
immunohistochemistry in one. The LockDown device acts as a scaffold for connective tissue
which forms an investing fibrous pseudoligament. The immunological
response at the histological level seems favourable with a limited
histiocytic and giant cell response to micron-sized wear particles.
The connective tissue envelope around the implant is less organised
than a native ligament. Cite this article:
To compare radiographic failure and re-operation rates of anatomical
coracoclavicular (CC) ligament reconstructional techniques with
non-anatomical techniques after chronic high grade acromioclavicular
(AC) joint injuries. We reviewed chronic AC joint reconstructions within a region-wide
healthcare system to identify surgical technique, complications,
radiographic failure and re-operations. Procedures fell into four
categories: Aims
Patients and Methods
The December 2015 Shoulder &
Elbow Roundup360 looks at:
The aim of this review is to address controversies
in the management of dislocations of the acromioclavicular joint. Current
evidence suggests that operative rather than non-operative treatment
of Rockwood grade III dislocations results in better cosmetic and
radiological results, similar functional outcomes and longer time
off work. Early surgery results in better functional and radiological
outcomes with a reduced risk of infection and loss of reduction compared
with delayed surgery. Surgical options include acromioclavicular fixation, coracoclavicular
fixation and coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction. Although
non-controlled studies report promising results for arthroscopic
coracoclavicular fixation, there are no comparative studies with
open techniques to draw conclusions about the best surgical approach.
Non-rigid coracoclavicular fixation with tendon graft or synthetic
materials, or rigid acromioclavicular fixation with a hook plate,
is preferable to fixation with coracoclavicular screws owing to
significant risks of loosening and breakage. The evidence, although limited, also suggests that anatomical
ligament reconstruction with autograft or certain synthetic grafts
may have better outcomes than non-anatomical transfer of the coracoacromial
ligament. It has been suggested that this is due to better restoration
horizontal and vertical stability of the joint. Despite the large number of recently published studies, there
remains a lack of high-quality evidence, making it difficult to
draw firm conclusions regarding these controversial issues. Cite this article:
