The aim of this study was to identify predictors of return to
work (RTW) after revision lower limb arthroplasty in patients of
working age in the United Kingdom. We assessed 55 patients aged ≤ 65 years after revision total
hip arthroplasty (THA). There were 43 women and 12 men with a mean
age of 54 years (23 to 65). We also reviewed 30 patients after revision
total knee arthroplasty (TKA). There were 14 women and 16 men with
a mean age of 58 years (48 to 64). Preoperatively, age, gender,
body mass index, social deprivation, mode of failure, length of
primary implant survival, work status and nature, activity level
(University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score), and Oxford
Hip and Knee Scores were recorded. Postoperatively, RTW status,
Oxford Hip and Knee Scores, EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D), UCLA score, and
Work, Osteoarthritis and Joint-Replacement Questionnaire (WORQ)
scores were obtained. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed.Aims
Patients and Methods
Positive cultures are not uncommon in cases of revision total
knee and hip arthroplasty (TKA and THA) for presumed aseptic causes.
The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence of positive
intra-operative cultures in presumed aseptic revision of TKA and
THA, and to determine whether the presence of intra-operative positive cultures
results in inferior survival in such cases. A retrospective cohort study was assembled with 679 patients
undergoing revision knee (340 cases) or hip arthroplasty (339 cases)
for presumed aseptic causes. For all patients three or more separate
intra-operative cultures were obtained. Patients were diagnosed
with a previously unsuspected prosthetic joint infection (PJI) if two
or more cultures were positive with the same organism. Records were
reviewed for demographic details, pre-operative laboratory results
and culture results. The primary outcome measure was infection-free
implant survival at two years.Aims
Patients and Methods
We analysed data from the Oxford hip and knee questionnaires collected by the New Zealand Joint Registry at six months and five years after joint replacement, to determine if there was any relationship between the scores and the risk of early revision. Logistic regression of the six-month scores indicated that for every one-unit decrease in the Oxford score, the risk of revision within two years increased by 9.7% for total hip replacement (THR), 9.9% for total knee replacement (TKR) and 12.0% for unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR). Our findings showed that 70% of the revisions within two years for TKR and 67% for THR and UKR would have been captured by monitoring the lowest 22%, 28% and 28%, respectively, of the Oxford scores. When analysed using the Kalairajah classification a score of <
27 (poor) was associated with a risk of revision within two years of 7.6% for THR, 7.0% for TKR and 24.3% for UKR, compared with risks of 0.7%, 0.7% and 1.8%, respectively, for scores >
34 (good or excellent). Our study confirms that the Oxford hip and knee scores at six months are useful predictors of early revision after THR and TKR and we recommend their use for the monitoring of the outcome and potential failure in these patients.
We randomised 102 knees suitable for a
