Aims. Eccentric reductions may become concentric through femoral head ‘docking’ (FHD) following closed reduction (CR) for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). However, changes regarding position and morphology through FHD are not well understood. We aimed to assess these changes using serial MRI. Methods. We reviewed 103 patients with DDH successfully treated by CR and spica casting in a single institution between January 2016 and December 2020. MRI was routinely performed immediately after CR and at the end of each cast. Using MRI, we described the labrum-acetabular cartilage complex (LACC) morphology, and measured the femoral head to
Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) describes a pathological relationship between the femoral head and acetabulum. Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) may be used to treat this condition. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of PAO in adolescents and adults with persistent DDH. Patients were divided into four groups: A, adolescents who had not undergone surgery for DDH in childhood (25 hips); B, adolescents who had undergone surgery for DDH in childhood (20 hips); C, adults with DDH who had not undergone previous surgery (80 hips); and D, a control group of patients with healthy hips (70 hips). The radiological evaluation of digital anteroposterior views of hips included the Wiberg angle (centre-edge angle (CEA)), femoral head cover (FHC), medialization, distalization, and the ilioischial angle. Clinical assessment involved the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and gluteal muscle performance assessment.Aims
Methods
The aims of this study were to compare clinically relevant measurements of hip dysplasia on radiographs taken in the supine and standing position, and to compare Hip2Norm software and Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS)-derived digital radiological measurements. Preoperative supine and standing radiographs of 36 consecutive patients (43 hips) who underwent periacetabular osteotomy surgery were retrospectively analyzed from a single-centre, two-surgeon cohort. Anterior coverage (AC), posterior coverage (PC), lateral centre-edge angle (LCEA), acetabular inclination (AI), sharp angle (SA), pelvic tilt (PT), retroversion index (RI), femoroepiphyseal acetabular roof (FEAR) index, femoroepiphyseal horizontal angle (FEHA), leg length discrepancy (LLD), and pelvic obliquity (PO) were analyzed using both Hip2Norm software and PACS-derived measurements where applicable.Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to investigate the
incidence of dysplasia in the ‘normal’ contralateral hip in patients
with unilateral developmental dislocation of the hip (DDH) and to
evaluate the long-term prognosis of such hips. A total of 48 patients
(40 girls and eight boys) were treated for late-detected unilateral
DDH between 1958 and 1962. After preliminary skin traction, closed
reduction was achieved at a mean age of 17.8 months (4 to 65) in
all except one patient who needed open reduction. In 25 patients
early derotation femoral osteotomy of the contralateral hip had been
undertaken within three years of reduction, and later surgery in
ten patients. Radiographs taken during childhood and adulthood were
reviewed. The mean age of the patients was 50.9 years (43 to 55)
at the time of the latest radiological review. In all, eight patients (17%) developed dysplasia of the contralateral
hip, defined as a centre-edge (CE) angle <
20° during childhood
or at skeletal maturity. Six of these patients underwent surgery
to improve cover of the femoral head; the dysplasia improved in
two after varus femoral osteotomy and in two after an acetabular
shelf operation. During long-term follow-up the dysplasia deteriorated
to subluxation in two patients (CE angles 4° and 5°, respectively)
who both developed osteoarthritis (OA), and one of these underwent
total hip replacement at the age of 49 years. In conclusion, the long-term prognosis for the contralateral
hip was relatively good, as OA occurred in only two hips (4%) at
a mean follow-up of 50 years. Regular review of the ‘normal’ side
is indicated, and corrective surgery should be undertaken in those
who develop subluxation. Cite this article:
The use of joint-preserving surgery of the hip
has been largely abandoned since the introduction of total hip replacement.
However, with the modification of such techniques as pelvic osteotomy,
and the introduction of intracapsular procedures such as surgical
hip dislocation and arthroscopy, previously unexpected options for
the surgical treatment of sequelae of childhood conditions, including
developmental dysplasia of the hip, slipped upper femoral epiphysis
and Perthes’ disease, have become available. Moreover, femoroacetabular
impingement has been identified as a significant aetiological factor
in the development of osteoarthritis in many hips previously considered to
suffer from primary osteoarthritis. As mechanical causes of degenerative joint disease are now recognised
earlier in the disease process, these techniques may be used to
decelerate or even prevent progression to osteoarthritis. We review
the recent development of these concepts and the associated surgical
techniques. Cite this article:
In the majority of patients with slipped upper
femoral epiphysis only one hip is involved at primary diagnosis. However,
the contralateral hip often becomes involved over time. There are
no reliable factors predicting a contralateral slip. Whether or
not the contralateral hip should undergo prophylactic fixation is
a matter of controversy. We present a number of essential points
that have to be considered both when choosing to fix the contralateral
hip prophylactically as well as when refraining from surgery and
instead following the patients with repeat radiographs.
The treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip diagnosed after the first year of life remains controversial. A series of 36 children (47 hips), aged between one and 4.9 years underwent gradual closed reduction using the Petit-Morel method. A pelvic osteotomy was required in 43 hips (91.5%). The patients whose hips did not require pelvic osteotomy were among the youngest. The mean age at final follow-up was 16.1 years (11.3 to 32). The mean follow-up was 14.3 years (10 to 30). At the latest follow-up, 44 hips (93.6%) were graded as excellent or good according to the Severin classification. Closed reduction failed in only two hips (4.3%) which then required open reduction. Mild avascular necrosis was observed in one (2.1%). The accuracy of the reduction and associated low complication rate justify the use of the Petit-Morel technique as the treatment of choice for developmental dysplasia of the hip in patients aged between one and five years.
We treated 26 hips (24 consecutive patients) with residual dysplasia by a technique of incomplete triple pelvic osteotomy. The mean age of the patients was 21.6 years. The mean values for the pre-operative centre-edge angle of Wiberg, the refined centre-edge angle, the acetabular angle of Sharp, the modified acetabular angle and femoral head lateralisation were 7.7°, −3.1°, 49.3°, 53.2° and 17.2 mm, respectively. After a mean follow-up of 3.3 years they were 27.0°, 13.0°, 38.9°, 44.3° and 15.9 mm, respectively (p <
0.05). The osteoarthritic grading changed adversely in one hip. The mean pre-operative and latest Harris hip scores were 74.9 and 93.0, respectively (p <
0.05). This technique provides a stable osteotomy with maintenance of the posterior column which allows early mobilisation and minimal internal fixation. The technique is not complex and requires minimal blood transfusion. The use of an image intensifier is not necessary and harvesting of a subcristal bone graft avoids post-operative complications at the donor site.