Malreduction of the syndesmosis has been reported in up to 52% of patients after fixation of ankle fractures. Multiple radiological parameters are used to define malreduction; there has been limited investigation of the accuracy of these measurements in differentiating malreduction from inherent anatomical asymmetry. The purpose of this study was to identify the prevalence of positive malreduction standards within the syndesmosis of native, uninjured ankles. Three observers reviewed 213 bilateral lower limb CT scans of uninjured ankles. Multiple measurements were recorded on the axial CT 1 cm above the plafond: anterior syndesmotic distance; posterior syndesmotic distance; central syndesmotic distance; fibular rotation; and sagittal fibular translation. Previously studied malreduction standards were evaluated on bilateral CT, including differences in: anterior, central and posterior syndesmotic distance; mean syndesmotic distance; fibular rotation; sagittal translational distance; and syndesmotic area. Unilateral CT was used to compare the anterior to posterior syndesmotic distances.Aims
Methods
The primary aim of this study was to address the hypothesis that fracture morphology might be more important than posterior malleolar fragment size in rotational type posterior malleolar ankle fractures (PMAFs). The secondary aim was to identify clinically important predictors of outcome for each respective PMAF-type, to challenge the current dogma that surgical decision-making should be based on fragment size. This observational prospective cohort study included 70 patients with operatively treated rotational type PMAFs, respectively: 23 Haraguchi Type I (large posterolateral-oblique), 22 Type II (two-part posterolateral and posteromedial), and 25 (avulsion-) Type III. There was no standardized protocol on how to address the PMAFs and CT-imaging was used to classify fracture morphology and quality of postoperative syndesmotic reduction. Quantitative 3D-CT (Q3DCT) was used to assess the quality of fracture reduction, respectively: the proportion of articular involvement; residual intra-articular: gap, step-off, and 3D-displacement; and residual gap and step-off at the fibular notch. These predictors were correlated with the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) at two-years follow-up.Aims
Methods
Our aim was to compare the one-year post-operative
outcomes following retention or removal of
Our aim was to compare polylevolactic acid screws
with titanium screws when used for fixation of the distal tibiofibular
syndesmosis at mid-term follow-up. A total of 168 patients, with
a mean age of 38.5 years (18 to 72) who were randomly allocated
to receive either polylevolactic acid (n = 86) or metallic (n =
82) screws were included. The Baird scoring system was used to assess
the overall satisfaction and functional recovery post-operatively.
The demographic details and characteristics of the injury were similar
in the two groups. The mean follow-up was 55.8 months (48 to 66).
The Baird scores were similar in the two groups at the final follow-up.
Patients in the polylevolactic acid group had a greater mean dorsiflexion
(p = 0.011) and plantar-flexion of the injured ankles (p <
0.001).
In the same group, 18 patients had a mild and eight patients had
a moderate foreign body reaction. In the metallic groups eight had
mild and none had a moderate foreign body reaction (p <
0.001).
In total, three patients in the polylevolactic acid group and none
in the metallic group had heterotopic ossification (p = 0.246). We conclude that both screws provide adequate fixation and functional
recovery, but polylevolactic acid screws are associated with a higher
incidence of foreign body reactions. Cite this article:
The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcome of patients with intact, broken and removed syndesmosis screws after Weber B or C ankle fracture with an associated injury to the syndesmosis. We hypothesised that there would be no difference. Of a possible 142 patients who fulfilled our inclusion criteria, 52 returned for clinical and radiological assessment at least one year after surgery. Of these, 27 had intact syndesmosis screws, ten had broken screws, and 15 had undergone elective removal of the screw. The mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle/hindfoot score was 83.07 (. sd. 13.59) in the intact screw group, 92.40 (. sd. 12.69) in the broken screw group, and 85.80 (. sd. 11.33) in the removed screw group (p = 0.0466). There was no difference in clinical outcome of patients with intact or removed
