Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is gaining popularity as a treatment for displaced femoral neck fractures (FNFs), especially in physiologically younger patients. While THA for osteoarthritis (OA) has demonstrated low complication rates and increased quality of life, results of THA for acute FNF are not as clear. Currently, a THA performed for FNF is included in an institutional arthroplasty bundle without adequate risk adjustment, potentially placing centres participating in fracture care at financial disadvantage. The purpose of this study is to report on perioperative complication rates after THA for FNF compared with elective THA performed for OA of the hip. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database between 2008 and 2016 was queried. Patients were identified using the THA Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code and divided into groups by diagnosis: OA in one and FNF in another. Univariate statistics were performed. Continuous variables were compared between groups using Student’s Aims
Patients and Methods
Increasingly, patients with bilateral hip arthritis wish to undergo staged total hip arthroplasty (THA). With the rise in demand for arthroplasty, perioperative risk assessment and counselling is crucial for shared decision making. However, it is unknown if complications that occur after a unilateral hip arthroplasty predict complications following surgery of the contralateral hip. We used nationwide linked discharge data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project between 2005 and 2014 to analyze the incidence and recurrence of complications following the first- and second-stage operations in staged bilateral total hip arthroplasty (BTHAs). Complications included perioperative medical adverse events within 30 to 60 days, and infection and mechanical complications within one year. Conditional probabilities and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to determine whether experiencing a complication after the first stage of surgery increased the risk of developing the same complication after the second stage.Aims
Patients and Methods
The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in 30-day outcomes between patients undergoing revision for an infected total hip arthroplasty (THA) compared with an aseptic revision THA. This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database, between 2012 and 2017, using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for patients undergoing a revision THA (27134, 27137, 27138). International Classification of Diseases Ninth Revision/Tenth Revision (ICD-9-CM, ICD-10-CM) diagnosis codes for infection of an implant or device were used to identify patients undergoing an infected revision THA. CPT-27132 coupled with ICD-9-CM/ICD-10-CM codes for infection were used to identify patients undergoing a two-stage revision. A total of 13 556 patients were included; 1606 (11.8%) underwent a revision THA due to infection and there were 11 951 (88.2%) aseptic revisions.Aims
Patients and Methods
The aim of this study was to compare the rate of perioperative
complications following aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty
(THA) in patients aged ≥ 80 years with that in those aged <
80
years, and to identify risk factors for the incidence of serious
adverse events in those aged ≥ 80 years using a large validated
national database. Patients who underwent aseptic revision THA were identified in
the 2005 to 2015 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP)
database and stratified into two age groups: those aged <
80
years and those aged ≥ 80 years. Preoperative and procedural characteristics
were compared. Multivariate regression analysis was used to compare
the risk of postoperative complications and readmission. Risk factors
for the development of a serious adverse event in those aged ≥ 80
years were characterized.Aims
Patients and Methods
The diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is difficult and requires a battery of tests and clinical findings. The purpose of this review is to summarize all current evidence for common and new serum biomarkers utilized in the diagnosis of PJI. We searched two literature databases, using terms that encompass all hip and knee arthroplasty procedures, as well as PJI and statistical terms reflecting diagnostic parameters. The findings are summarized as a narrative review.Objectives
Methods
We describe our technique and rationale using
hybrid fixation for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) at the Hospital
for Special Surgery. Modern uncemented acetabular components have
few screw holes, or no holes, polished inner surfaces, improved
locking mechanisms, and maximised thickness and shell-liner conformity. Uncemented
sockets can be combined with highly cross-linked polyethylene liners,
which have demonstrated very low wear and osteolysis rates after
ten to 15 years of implantation. The results of cement fixation
with a smooth or polished surface finished stem have been excellent,
virtually eliminating complications seen with cementless fixation
like peri-operative femoral fractures and thigh pain. Although mid-term
results of modern cementless stems are encouraging, the long-term
data do not show reduced revision rates for cementless stems compared
with cemented smooth stems. In this paper we review the conduct
of a hybrid THA, with emphasis on pre-operative planning, surgical
technique, hypotensive epidural anaesthesia, and intra-operative
physiology. Cite this article:
