The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to assess and investigate the safety and efficacy of using a distal tibial osteotomy compared to proximal osteotomy for limb lengthening in children. In this study, there were 59 consecutive tibial lengthening and deformity corrections in 57 children using a circular frame. All were performed or supervised by the senior author between January 2013 and June 2019. A total of 25 who underwent a distal tibial osteotomy were analyzed and compared to a group of 34 who had a standard proximal tibial osteotomy. For each patient, the primary diagnosis, time in frame, complications, and lengthening achieved were recorded. From these data, the frame index was calculated (days/cm) and analyzed.Aims
Methods
Extendible endoprostheses have been available for more than 30
years and have become more sophisticated with time. The latest generation
is ‘non-invasive’ and can be lengthened with an external magnetic
force. Early results have shown a worryingly high rate of complications
such as infection. This study investigates the incidence of complications
and the need for further surgery in a cohort of patients with a
non-invasive growing endoprosthesis. Between 2003 and June 2014, 50 children (51 prostheses) had a
non-invasive growing prosthesis implanted for a primary bone sarcoma.
The minimum follow-up was 24 months for those who survived. Their
mean age was 10.4 years (6 to 14). The incidence of complications
and further surgery was documented.Aims
Patients and Methods
We wished to examine the effectiveness of tibial lengthening
using a two ring Ilizarov frame in skeletally immature patients.
This is a potentially biomechanically unstable construct which risks
the loss of axial control. We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive series of 24 boys and
26 girls, with a mean age of 8.6 years (4 to 14), who underwent
52 tibial lengthening procedures with a mean follow-up of 4.3 years
(4.0 to 16.9). Tibial alignment was measured before and after treatment
using joint orientation lines from the knee and a calculation of
the oblique plane axis.Aims
Patients and Methods
