It is unusual, if not unique, for three major research papers concerned with the management of the fractured neck of femur (FNOF) to be published in a short period of time, each describing large prospective randomized clinical trials. These studies were conducted in up to 17 countries worldwide, involving up to 80 surgical centers and include large numbers of patients (up to 2,900) with FNOF. Each article investigated common clinical dilemmas; the first paper comparing total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for FNOF, the second as to whether ‘fast track’ care offers improved clinical outcomes and the third, compares sliding hip with multiple cancellous hip screws. Each paper has been deemed of sufficient quality and importance to warrant publication in The Lancet or the New England Journal of Medicine. Although ‘premier’ journals, they only occationally contain orthopaedic studies and thus may not be routinely read by the busy orthopaedic/surgical clinician of any grade. It is therefore our intention with this present article to accurately summarize and combine the results of all three papers, presenting, in our opinion, the most important clinically relevant facts. Cite this article:
The most frequent cause of failure after total
hip replacement in all reported arthroplasty registries is peri-prosthetic
osteolysis. Osteolysis is an active biological process initiated
in response to wear debris. The eventual response to this process
is the activation of macrophages and loss of bone. Activation of macrophages initiates a complex biological cascade
resulting in the final common pathway of an increase in osteolytic
activity. The biological initiators, mechanisms for and regulation
of this process are beginning to be understood. This article explores current
concepts in the causes of, and underlying biological mechanism resulting
in peri-prosthetic osteolysis, reviewing the current basic science
and clinical literature surrounding the topic.
