Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a challenging complication of any arthroplasty procedure. We reviewed our use of static antibiotic-loaded cement spacers (ABLCSs) for staged management of PJI where segmental bone loss, ligamentous instability, or soft-tissue defects necessitate a static construct. We reviewed factors contributing to their failure and techniques to avoid these complications when using ABLCSs in this context. A retrospective analysis was conducted of 94 patients undergoing first-stage revision of an infected knee prosthesis between September 2007 and January 2020 at a single institution. Radiographs and clinical records were used to assess and classify the incidence and causes of static spacer failure. Of the 94 cases, there were 19 primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs), ten revision TKAs (varus-valgus constraint), 20 hinged TKAs, one arthrodesis (nail), one failed spacer (performed elsewhere), 21 distal femoral endoprosthetic arthroplasties, and 22 proximal tibial arthroplasties.Aims
Methods
The mid-term results of kinematic alignment (KA) for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using image derived instrumentation (IDI) have not been reported in detail, and questions remain regarding ligamentous stability and revisions. This paper aims to address the following: 1) what is the distribution of alignment of KA TKAs using IDI; 2) is a TKA alignment category associated with increased risk of failure or poor patient outcomes; 3) does extending limb alignment lead to changes in soft-tissue laxity; and 4) what is the five-year survivorship and outcomes of KA TKA using IDI? A prospective, multicentre, trial enrolled 100 patients undergoing KA TKA using IDI, with follow-up to five years. Alignment measures were conducted pre- and postoperatively to assess constitutional alignment and final implant position. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of pain and function were also included. The Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Arthroplasty Registry was used to assess survivorship.Aims
Methods
This study aimed to describe the use of revision knee arthroplasty in Australia and examine changes in lifetime risk over a decade. De-identified individual-level data on all revision knee arthroplasties performed in Australia from 2007 to 2017 were obtained from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Population data and life tables were obtained from the Australian Bureau of Statistics. The lifetime risk of revision surgery was calculated for each year using a standardized formula. Separate calculations were undertaken for males and females.Aims
Methods
There has been a significant reduction in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) procedures recorded in Australia. This follows several national joint registry studies documenting high UKA revision rates when compared to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). With the recent introduction of robotically assisted UKA procedures, it is hoped that outcomes improve. This study examines the cumulative revision rate of UKA procedures implanted with a newly introduced robotic system and compares the results to one of the best performing non-robotically assisted UKA prostheses, as well as all other non-robotically assisted UKA procedures. Data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Arthroplasty Registry (AOANJRR) for all UKA procedures performed for osteoarthritis (OA) between 2015 and 2018 were analyzed. Procedures using the Restoris MCK UKA prosthesis implanted using the Mako Robotic-Arm Assisted System were compared to non-robotically assisted Zimmer Unicompartmental High Flex Knee System (ZUK) UKA, a commonly used UKA with previously reported good outcomes and to all other non-robotically assisted UKA procedures using Cox proportional hazard ratios (HRs) and Kaplan-Meier estimates of survivorship.Aim
Methods
Previous studies of failure mechanisms leading
to revision total knee replacement (TKR) performed between 1986 and
2000 determined that many failed early, with a disproportionate
amount accounted for by infection and implant-associated factors
including wear, loosening and instability. Since then, efforts have
been made to improve implant performance and instruct surgeons in
best practice. Recently our centre participated in a multi-centre evaluation
of 844 revision TKRs from 2010 to 2011. The purpose was to report
a detailed analysis of failure mechanisms over time and to see if
failure modes have changed over the past 10 to 15 years. Aseptic
loosening was the predominant mechanism of failure (31.2%), followed
by instability (18.7%), infection (16.2%), polyethylene wear (10.0%),
arthrofibrosis (6.9%) and malalignment (6.6%). The mean time to
failure was 5.9 years (ten days to 31 years), 35.3% of all revisions
occurred at less than two years, and 60.2% in the first five years.
With improvements in implant and polyethylene manufacture, polyethylene
wear is no longer a leading cause of failure. Early mechanisms of
failure are primarily technical errors. In addition to improving
implant longevity, industry and surgeons must work together to decrease
these technical errors. All reports on failure of TKR contain patients
with unexplained pain who not infrequently have unmet expectations.
Surgeons must work to achieve realistic patient expectations pre-operatively,
and therefore, improve patient satisfaction post-operatively. Cite this article:
Current analysis of unicondylar knee replacements
(UKRs) by national registries is based on the pooled results of medial
and lateral implants. Consequently, little is known about the differential
performance of medial and lateral replacements and the influence
of each implant type within these pooled analyses. Using data from
the National Joint Registry for England and Wales (NJR) we aimed
to determine the proportion of UKRs implanted on the lateral side
of the knee, and their survival and reason for failure compared
with medial UKRs. By combining information on the side of operation
with component details held on the NJR, we were able to determine
implant laterality (medial
Patients with skeletal dysplasia are prone to
developing advanced osteoarthritis of the knee requiring total knee replacement
(TKR) at a younger age than the general population. TKR in this
unique group of patients is a technically demanding procedure owing
to the deformity, flexion contracture, generalised hypotonia and ligamentous
laxity. We retrospectively reviewed the outcome of 11 TKRs performed
in eight patients with skeletal dysplasia at our institution using
the Stanmore Modular Individualised Lower Extremity System (SMILES)
custom-made rotating-hinge TKR. There were three men and five women
with mean age of 57 years (41 to 79). Patients were followed clinically
and radiologically for a mean of seven years (3 to 11.5). The mean
Knee Society clinical and function scores improved from 24 (14 to
36) and 20 (5 to 40) pre-operatively, respectively, to 68 (28 to
80) and 50 (22 to 74), respectively, at final follow-up. Four complications
were recorded, including a patellar fracture following a fall, a
tibial peri-prosthetic fracture, persistent anterior knee pain,
and aseptic loosening of a femoral component requiring revision.
Our results demonstrate that custom primary rotating-hinge TKR in
patients with skeletal dysplasia is effective at relieving pain,
with a satisfactory range of movement and improved function. It compensates
for bony deformity and ligament deficiency and reduces the likelihood
of corrective osteotomy. Patellofemoral joint complications are
frequent and functional outcome is worse than with primary TKR in
the general population.
