A total of 12 epileptic patients (14 shoulders)
with recurrent seizures and anterior dislocations of the shoulder underwent
a Latarjet procedure and were reviewed at a mean of 8.3 years (1
to 20) post-operatively. Mean forward flexion decreased from 165° (100° to 180°)
to 160° (90° to 180°) (p = 0.5) and mean external rotation from 54° (10° to 90°)
to 43° (5° to 75°) (p = 0.058). The mean Rowe score was 76 (35 to
100) at the final follow-up. Radiologically, all shoulders showed
a glenoid-rim defect and Hill-Sachs lesions pre-operatively. Osteo-arthritic changes
of the glenohumeral joint were observed in five shoulders (36%)
pre-operatively and in eight shoulders (57%) post-operatively.
Re-dislocation during a seizure occurred in six shoulders (43%).
Five of these patients underwent revision surgery using a bone buttress
from the iliac crest and two of these patients re-dislocated due
to a new seizure. Due to the unacceptably high rate of re-dislocation after surgery
in these patients, the most important means of reducing the incidence
of further dislocation is the medical management of the seizures.
The Latarjet procedure should be reserved for the well-controlled
patient with epilepsy who has recurrent anterior dislocation of
the shoulder during activities of daily living.
Dislocation of the shoulder may occur during
seizures in epileptics and other patients who have convulsions. Following
the initial injury, recurrent instability is common owing to a tendency
to develop large bony abnormalities of the humeral head and glenoid
and a susceptibility to further seizures. Assessment is difficult
and diagnosis may be missed, resulting in chronic locked dislocations
with protracted morbidity. Many patients have medical comorbidities,
and successful treatment requires a multidisciplinary approach addressing
the underlying seizure disorder in addition to the shoulder pathology.
The use of bony augmentation procedures may have improved the outcomes
after surgical intervention, but currently there is no evidence-based
consensus to guide treatment. This review outlines the epidemiology
and pathoanatomy of seizure-related instability, summarising the
currently-favoured options for treatment, and their results.
The treatment of a chronic posterior dislocation of the shoulder is often determined by the size of the associated impression fracture of the humeral head. Our hypothesis was that patients with a chronic unreduced posterior dislocation of the shoulder and a defect in the humeral head involving between 25% to 50% of the articular surface, would do better if reconstructed with an allograft from the
There are no long-term published results on the survival of a third-generation cemented total shoulder replacement. We describe a clinical and radiological study of the Aequalis total shoulder replacement for a minimum of ten years. Between September 1996 and May 1998, 39 consecutive patients underwent a primary cemented total shoulder replacement using this prosthesis. Data were collected prospectively on all patients each year, for a minimum of ten years, or until death or failure of the prosthesis. At a follow-up of at least ten years, 12 patients had died with the prosthesis intact and two had emigrated, leaving 25 available for clinical review. Of these, 13 had rheumatoid arthritis and 12 osteoarthritis. One refused radiological review leaving 24 with fresh radiographs. Survivorship at ten years was 100% for the humeral component and 92% for the glenoid component. The incidence of lucent lines was low. No humeral component was thought to be at risk and only two glenoid components. The osteoarthritic group gained a mean 65° in forward flexion and their Constant score improved by a mean 41.4 points (13 to 55). The rheumatoid group gained a mean of 24° in flexion and their Constant score improved by 29.4 points. This difference may have been due to failure of the rotator cuff in 75% of the patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Thus a third-generation total shoulder replacement gives an excellent result in patients with osteoarthritis and an intact rotator cuff. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis have a 75% risk of failure of the rotator cuff at ten years.
We describe the use of a vascularised periosteal patch onlay graft based on the 1,2 intercompartmental supraretinacular artery in the management of 11 patients (ten men, one woman) with chronic nonunion involving the proximal third of the scaphoid. The mean age of the patients was 31 years (21 to 45) with the dominant hand affected in eight. Six of the patients were smokers and three had undergone previous surgery to the scaphoid. All of the proximal fragments were avascular. The presence of union was assessed using longitudinal axis CT. Only three patients progressed to union of the scaphoid and four required a salvage operation for a symptomatic nonunion. The remaining four patients with a persistent nonunion are asymptomatic with low pain scores, good grip strength and a functional range of wrist movement. Although this technique has potential technical advantages over vascularised pedicled bone grafting, the rate of union has been disappointing and we do not recommend it as a method of treatment.
Over a seven-year period we treated a consecutive series of 58 patients, 20 men and 38 women with a mean age of 66 years (21 to 87) who had an acute complex anterior fracture-dislocation of the proximal humerus. Two patterns of injury are proposed for study based upon a prospective assessment of the pattern of soft-tissue and bony injury and the degree of devascularisation of the humeral head. In 23 patients, the head had retained capsular attachments and arterial back-bleeding (type-I injury), whereas in 35 patients the head was devoid of significant soft-tissue attachments with no active arterial bleeding (type-II injury). Following treatment by open reduction and internal fixation, only two of 23 patients with type-I injuries developed radiological evidence of osteonecrosis of the humeral head, compared with four of seven patients with type-II injuries. A policy of primary treatment by open reduction and internal fixation of type-I injuries is justified, whereas most elderly patients (aged 60 years or over) with type-II injuries are best treated by hemiarthroplasty. The best treatment for younger patients (aged under 60 years) who sustain type-II injuries is controversial and an individualised approach to their management is advocated.