A number of methods have been described to remove a well-fixed humeral implant as part of revision shoulder arthroplasty. These include the use of cortical windows and humeral osteotomies. The router bit extraction technique uses a high-speed router bit to disrupt the bone-implant interface. The implant is then struck in a retrograde fashion with a square-tip impactor and mallet. The purpose of this study was to determine the characteristics and frequency of the different techniques needed for the removal of a well-fixed humeral stem in revision shoulder arthroplasty. Between 2010 and 2018, 288 revision shoulder arthroplasty procedures requiring removal of a well-fixed humeral component were carried out at a tertiary referral centre by a single surgeon. The patient demographics, indications for surgery, and method of extraction were collected.Aims
Patients and Methods
The aim of this study was to use national registry database information to estimate cumulative rates and relative risk of revision due to infection after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. We included 17 730 primary shoulder arthroplasties recorded between 2004 and 2013 in The Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) data set. With the Kaplan–Meier method, we illustrated the ten-year cumulative rates of revision due to infection and with the Cox regression model, we reported the hazard ratios as a measure of the relative risk of revision due to infection.Aims
Patients and Methods
Patients with a failed reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) have limited salvage options. The aim of this study was to determine the outcome of revision RSA when used as a salvage procedure for a failed primary RSA. We reviewed all revision RSAs performed for a failed primary RSA between 2006 and 2012, excluding patients with a follow-up of less than two years. A total of 27 revision RSAs were included in the study. The mean age of the patients at the time of revision was 70 years (58 to 82). Of the 27 patients, 14 (52% were female). The mean follow-up was 4.4 years (2 to 10).Aims
Patients and Methods
The reasons for failure of a hemirthroplasty (HA) when used to
treat a proximal humeral fracture include displaced or necrotic
tuberosities, insufficient metaphyseal bone-stock, and rotator cuff
tears. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is often the only
remaining form of treatment in these patients. The aim of this study
was to evaluate the clinical outcome after conversions from a failed
HA to rTSA. A total of 35 patients, in whom a HA, as treatment for a fracture
of the proximal humerus, had failed, underwent conversion to a rTSA.
A total of 28 were available for follow-up at a mean of 61 months
(37 to 91), having been initially reviewed at a mean of 20 months
(12 to 36) postoperatively. Having a convertible design, the humeral
stem could be preserved in nine patients. The stem was removed in
the other 19 patients and a conventional rTSA was implanted. At
final follow-up, patients were assessed using the American Shoulder
and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the Constant Score, and plain radiographs.Aims
Material and Methods
If a modular convertible total shoulder system
is used as a primary implant for an anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty,
failure of the prosthesis or the rotator cuff can be addressed by
converting it to a reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), with retention
of the humeral stem and glenoid baseplate. This has the potential
to reduce morbidity and improve the results. In a retrospective study of 14 patients (15 shoulders) with a
mean age of 70 years (47 to 83) we reviewed the clinical and radiological
outcome of converting an anatomical shoulder arthroplasty (ASA)
to a RSA using a convertible prosthetic system (SMR system, Lima,
San Daniele, Italy). The mean operating time was 64 minutes (45 to 75). All humeral
stems and glenoid baseplates were found to be well-fixed and could
be retained. There were no intra-operative or early post-operative
complications and no post-operative infection. The mean follow-up was 43 months (21 to 83), by which time the
mean visual analogue scale for pain had decreased from 8 pre-operatively
to 1, the mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score from 12
to 76, the mean Oxford shoulder score from 3 to 39, the mean Western
Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Score from 1618 to 418 and
the mean Subjective shoulder value from 15 to 61. On radiological review, one patient had a lucency around the
humeral stem, two had stress shielding. There were no fatigue fractures
of the acromion but four cases of grade 1 scapular notching. The use of a convertible prosthetic system to revise a failed
ASA reduces morbidity and minimises the rate of complications. The
mid-term clinical and radiological results of this technique are
promising. Cite this article:
Patients with pain and loss of shoulder function
due to nonunion of a fracture of the proximal third of the humerus may
benefit from reverse total shoulder replacement. This paper reports
a prospective, multicentre study, involving three hospitals and
three surgeons, of 35 patients (28 women, seven men) with a mean
age of 69 years (46 to 83) who underwent a reverse total shoulder
replacement for the treatment of nonunion of a fracture of the proximal humerus.
Using Checchia’s classification, nine nonunions were type I, eight
as type II, 12 as type III and six as type IV. The mean follow-up
was 51 months (24 to 99). Post-operatively, the patients had a significant
decrease in pain (p <
0.001), and a significant improvement in
flexion, abduction, external rotation and Constant score (p <
0.001), but not in internal rotation. A total of nine complications
were recorded in seven patients: six dislocations, one glenoid loosening
in a patient who had previously suffered dislocation, one transitory
paresis of the axillary nerve and one infection. Reverse total shoulder replacement may lead to a significant
reduction in pain, improvement in function and a high degree of
satisfaction. However, the rate of complications, particularly dislocation,
was high. Cite this article:
