The primary objective of this study was to develop a validated classification system for assessing iatrogenic bone trauma and soft-tissue injury during total hip arthroplasty (THA). The secondary objective was to compare macroscopic bone trauma and soft-tissues injury in conventional THA (CO THA) versus robotic arm-assisted THA (RO THA) using this classification system. This study included 30 CO THAs versus 30 RO THAs performed by a single surgeon. Intraoperative photographs of the osseous acetabulum and periacetabular soft-tissues were obtained prior to implantation of the acetabular component, which were used to develop the proposed classification system. Interobserver and intraobserver variabilities of the proposed classification system were assessed.Aims
Methods
Achieving accurate implant positioning and restoring native hip biomechanics are key surgeon-controlled technical objectives in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The primary objective of this study was to compare the reproducibility of the planned preoperative centre of hip rotation (COR) in patients undergoing robotic arm-assisted THA versus conventional THA. This prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) included 60 patients with symptomatic hip osteoarthritis undergoing conventional THA (CO THA) versus robotic arm-assisted THA (RO THA). Patients in both arms underwent pre- and postoperative CT scans, and a patient-specific plan was created using the robotic software. The COR, combined offset, acetabular orientation, and leg length discrepancy were measured on the pre- and postoperative CT scanogram at six weeks following surgery.Aims
Methods
Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing (MoM-HR) has seen decreased usage due to safety and longevity concerns. Joint registries have highlighted the risks in females, smaller hips, and hip dysplasia. This study aimed to identify if reported risk factors are linked to revision in a long-term follow-up of MoM-HR performed by a non-designer surgeon. A retrospective review of consecutive MoM hip arthroplasties (MoM-HRAs) using Birmingham Hip Resurfacing was conducted. Data on procedure side, indication, implant sizes and orientation, highest blood cobalt and chromium ion concentrations, and all-cause revision were collected from local and UK National Joint Registry records.Aims
Methods
The Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) arthroplasty has been used as a surgical treatment of coxarthrosis since 1997. We present 20-year results of 234 consecutive BHRs performed in our unit. Between 1999 and 2001, there were 217 patients: 142 males (65.4%), mean age 52 years (18 to 68) who had 234 implants (17 bilateral). They had patient-reported outcome measures collected, imaging (radiograph and ultrasound), and serum metal ion assessment. Survivorship analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Revision for any cause was considered as an endpoint for the analysis.Aims
Methods
Hip resurfacing remains a potentially valuable surgical procedure for appropriately-selected patients with optimised implant choices. However, concern regarding high early failure rates continues to undermine confidence in use. A large contributor to failure is adverse local tissue reactions around metal-on-metal (MoM) bearing surfaces. Such phenomena have been well-explored around MoM total hip arthroplasties, but comparable data in equivalent hip resurfacing procedures is lacking. In order to define genetic predisposition, we performed a case-control study investigating the role of human leucocyte antigen (HLA) genotype in the development of pseudotumours around MoM hip resurfacings. A matched case-control study was performed using the prospectively-collected database at the host institution. In all, 16 MoM hip resurfacing 'cases' were identified as having symptomatic periprosthetic pseudotumours on preoperative metal artefact reduction sequence (MARS) MRI, and were subsequently histologically confirmed as high-grade aseptic lymphocyte-dominated vasculitis-associated lesions (ALVALs) at revision surgery. ‘Controls’ were matched by implant type in the absence of evidence of pseudotumour. Blood samples from all cases and controls were collected prospectively for high resolution genetic a nalysis targeting 11 separate HLA loci. Statistical significance was set at 0.10 a priori to determine the association between HLA genotype and pseudotumour formation, given the small sample size.Aims
Methods
To establish the survivorship, function, and metal ion levels in an unselected series of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasties (HRAs) performed by a non-designer surgeon. We reviewed 105 consecutive HRAs in 83 patients, performed by a single surgeon, at a mean follow-up of 14.9 years (9.3 to 19.1). The cohort included 45 male and 38 female patients, with a mean age of 49.5 years (SD 12.5)Aims
Methods
Vitamin E-diffused, highly crosslinked polyethylene (VEPE) and porous titanium-coated (PTC) shells were introduced in total hip arthroplasty (THA) to reduce the risk of aseptic loosening. The purpose of this study was: 1) to compare the wear properties of VEPE to moderately crosslinked polyethylene; 2) to assess the stability of PTC shells; and 3) to report their clinical outcomes at seven years. A total of 89 patients were enrolled into a prospective study. All patients received a PTC shell and were randomized to receive a VEPE liner (n = 44) or a moderately crosslinked polyethylene (ModXLPE) liner (n = 45). Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) was used to measure polyethylene wear and component migration. Differences in wear were assessed while adjusting for body mass index, activity level, acetabular inclination, anteversion, and head size. Plain radiographs were assessed for radiolucency and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were administered at each follow-up.Aims
Patients and Methods
Aims. The hip’s capsular ligaments passively restrain extreme range of movement (ROM) by wrapping around the native femoral head/neck. We determined the effect of hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA), dual-mobility
Objectives. The primary objective of this study was to compare accuracy in restoring the native centre of hip rotation in patients undergoing
The aim of this study was to report the implant survival and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in a consecutive series of patients aged less than 50 years at the time of arthroplasty using the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing system (BHR), with a minimum follow-up of ten years. A total of 226 patients with osteoarthritis of the hip, who underwent BHR and presented to a single surgeon, were included in the study. Survival of the implant was confirmed by cross-checking with the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Kaplan–Meier survival curves with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were constructed. Pre- and postoperative PROMs were compared with Aims
Patients and Methods
The routine use of dual-mobility (DM) acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty (THA) may not be cost-effective, but an increasing number of patients undergoing THA have a coexisting spinal disorder, which increases the risk of postoperative instability, and these patients may benefit from DM articulations. This study seeks to examine the cost-effectiveness of DM components as an alternative to standard articulations in these patients. A decision analysis model was used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of using DM components in patients who would be at high risk for dislocation within one year of THA. Direct and indirect costs of dislocation, incremental costs of using DM components, quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) values, and the probabilities of dislocation were derived from published data. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was established with a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000/QALY. Sensitivity analysis was used to examine the impact of variation.Aims
Patients and Methods
We report the kinematic and early clinical results
of a patient- and observer-blinded randomised controlled trial in which
CT scans were used to compare potential impingement-free range of
movement (ROM) and acetabular component cover between patients treated
with either the navigated ‘femur-first’ total hip arthroplasty (THA) method
(n = 66; male/female 29/37, mean age 62.5 years; 50 to 74) or conventional
THA (n = 69; male/female 35/34, mean age 62.9 years; 50 to 75).
The Hip Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, the Harris hip score, the
Euro-Qol-5D and the Mancuso THA patient expectations score were
assessed at six weeks, six months and one year after surgery. A
total of 48 of the patients (84%) in the navigated ‘femur-first’
group and 43 (65%) in the conventional group reached all the desirable
potential ROM boundaries without prosthetic impingement for activities
of daily living (ADL) in flexion, extension, abduction, adduction
and rotation (p = 0.016). Acetabular component cover and surface
contact with the host bone were >
87% in both groups. There was
a significant difference between the navigated and the conventional
groups’ Harris hip scores six weeks after surgery (p = 0.010). There
were no significant differences with respect to any clinical outcome
at six months and one year of follow-up. The navigated ‘femur-first’
technique improves the potential ROM for ADL without prosthetic
impingement, although there was no observed clinical difference
between the two treatment groups. Cite this article:
Conventional cemented acetabular components are
reported to have a high rate of failure when implanted into previously
irradiated bone. We recommend the use of a cemented reconstruction
with the addition of an acetabular reinforcement cross to improve
fixation. We reviewed a cohort of 45 patients (49 hips) who had undergone
irradiation of the pelvis and a cemented total hip arthroplasty
(THA) with an acetabular reinforcement cross. All hips had received
a minimum dose of 30 Gray (Gy) to treat a primary nearby tumour
or metastasis. The median dose of radiation was 50 Gy (Q1 to Q3:
45 to 60; mean: 49.57, 32 to 72). The mean follow-up after THA was 51 months (17 to 137). The cumulative
probability of revision of the acetabular component for a mechanical
reason was 0% (0 to 0%) at 24 months, 2.9% (0.2 to 13.3%) at 60
months and 2.9% (0.2% to 13.3%) at 120 months, respectively. One
hip was revised for mechanical failure and three for infection. Cemented acetabular components with a reinforcement cross provide
good medium-term fixation after pelvic irradiation. These patients
are at a higher risk of developing infection of their THA. Cite this article:
Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip (MoMHR)
has enjoyed a resurgence in the last decade, but is now again in question
as a routine option for osteoarthritis of the hip. Proponents of
hip resurfacing suggest that its survival is superior to that of
conventional hip replacement (THR), and that hip resurfacing is
less invasive, is easier to revise than THR, and provides superior
functional outcomes. Our argument serves to illustrate that none
of these proposed advantages have been realised and new and unanticipated
serious complications, such as pseudotumors, have been associated
with the procedure. As such, we feel that the routine use of MoMHR
is not justified. Cite this article:
We report a 12- to 15-year implant survival assessment
of a prospective single-surgeon series of Birmingham Hip Resurfacings
(BHRs). The earliest 1000 consecutive BHRs including 288 women (335
hips) and 598 men (665 hips) of all ages and diagnoses with no exclusions
were prospectively followed-up with postal questionnaires, of whom
the first 402 BHRs (350 patients) also had clinical and radiological
review. Mean follow-up was 13.7 years (12.3 to 15.3). In total, 59 patients
(68 hips) died 0.7 to 12.6 years following surgery from unrelated
causes. There were 38 revisions, 0.1 to 13.9 years (median 8.7)
following operation, including 17 femoral failures (1.7%) and seven
each of infections, soft-tissue reactions and other causes. With
revision for any reason as the end-point Kaplan–Meier survival analysis
showed 97.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 96.9 to 97.9) and 95.8%
(95% CI 95.1 to 96.5) survival at ten and 15 years, respectively.
Radiological assessment showed 11 (3.5%) femoral and 13 (4.1%) acetabular
radiolucencies which were not deemed failures and one radiological
femoral failure (0.3%). Our study shows that the performance of the BHR continues to
be good at 12- to 15-year follow-up. Men have better implant survival
(98.0%; 95% CI 97.4 to 98.6) at 15 years than women (91.5%; 95%
CI 89.8 to 93.2), and women <
60 years (90.5%; 95% CI 88.3 to
92.7) fare worse than others. Hip dysplasia and osteonecrosis are
risk factors for failure. Patients under 50 years with osteoarthritis
fare best (99.4%; 95% CI 98.8 to 100 survival at 15 years), with
no failures in men in this group. Cite this article:
Surface hip replacement (SHR) is generally used
in younger, active patients as an alternative conventional total
hip replacement in part because of the ability to preserve femoral
bone. This major benefit of surface replacement will only hold true
if revision procedures of SHRs are found to provide good clinical
results. A retrospective review of SHR revisions between 2007 and 2012
was presented, and the type of revision and aetiologies were recorded.
There were 55 SHR revisions, of which 27 were in women. At a mean
follow-up of 2.3 years (0.72 to 6.4), the mean post-operative Harris
hip score (HHS) was 94.8 (66 to 100). Overall 23 were revised for mechanical
reasons, nine for impingement, 13 for metallosis, nine for unexplained
pain and one for sepsis. Of the type of revision surgery performed,
14 were femoral-only revisions; four were acetabular-only revisions,
and 37 were complete revisions. We did not find that clinical scores were significantly different
between gender or different types of revisions. However, the mean
post-operative HHS was significantly lower in patients revised for
unexplained pain compared with patients revised for mechanical reasons
(86.9 (66 to 100) Based on the overall clinical results, we believe that revision
of SHR can have good or excellent results and warrants a continued
use of the procedure in selected patients. Close monitoring of these
patients facilitates early intervention, as we believe that tissue
damage may be related to the duration of an ongoing problem. There
should be a low threshold to revise a surface replacement if there
is component malposition, rising metal ion levels, or evidence of
soft-tissue abnormalities. Cite this article:
We aimed to determine the effect of surgical approach on the
histology of the femoral head following resurfacing of the hip. We performed a histological assessment of the bone under the
femoral component taken from retrieval specimens of patients having
revision surgery following resurfacing of the hip. We compared the
number of empty lacunae in specimens from patients who had originally
had a posterior surgical approach with the number in patients having alternative
surgical approaches.Objectives
Methods
The purpose of this study was twofold: first,
to determine whether the five-year results of hip resurfacing arthroplasty
(HRA) in Canada justified the continued use of HRA; and second,
to identify whether greater refinement of patient selection was
warranted. This was a retrospective cohort study that involved a review
of 2773 HRAs performed between January 2001 and December 2008 at
11 Canadian centres. Cox’s proportional hazards models were used
to analyse the predictors of failure of HRA. Kaplan–Meier survival
analysis was performed to predict the cumulative survival rate at
five years. The factors analysed included age, gender, body mass
index, pre-operative hip pathology, surgeon’s experience, surgical
approach, implant sizes and implant types. The most common modes
of failure were also analysed. The 2773 HRAs were undertaken in 2450 patients: 2127 in men and
646 in women. The mean age at operation was 50.5 years ( The failure rates of HRA at five years justify the ongoing use
of this technique in men. Female gender is an independent predictor
of failure, and a higher failure rate at five years in women leads
the authors to recommend this technique only in exceptional circumstances
for women. Cite this article:
Recent events have highlighted the importance
of implant design for survival and wear-related complications following
metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. The mid-term survival
of the most widely used implant, the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing
(BHR), has been described by its designers. The aim of this study
was to report the ten-year survival and patient-reported functional
outcome of the BHR from an independent centre. In this cohort of 554 patients (646 BHRs) with a mean age of
51.9 years (16.5 to 81.5) followed for a mean of eight years (1
to 12), the survival and patient-reported functional outcome depended
on gender and the size of the implant. In female hips (n = 267)
the ten-year survival was 74% (95% confidence interval (CI) 83 to
91), the ten-year revision rate for pseudotumour was 7%, the mean
Oxford hip score (OHS) was 43 ( This study supports the ongoing use of resurfacing in young active
men, who are a subgroup of patients who tend to have problems with
conventional THR. In contrast, the results in women have been poor
and we do not recommend metal-on-metal resurfacing in women. Continuous
follow-up is recommended because of the increasing incidence of
pseudotumour with the passage of time.
Peri-articular soft-tissue masses or ‘pseudotumours’
can occur after large-diameter metal-on-metal (MoM) resurfacing
of the hip and
