Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with a highly congruent condylar-stabilized (CS) articulation may be advantageous due to increased stability versus cruciate-retaining (CR) designs, while mitigating the limitations of a posterior-stabilized construct. The aim was to assess ten-year implant survival and functional outcomes of a cemented single-radius TKA with a CS insert, performed without posterior cruciate ligament sacrifice. This retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients undergoing TKA at a specialist centre in the UK between November 2010 and December 2012. Data were collected using a bespoke electronic database and cross-referenced with national arthroplasty audit data, with variables including: preoperative characteristics, intraoperative factors, complications, and mortality status. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected by a specialist research team at ten years post-surgery. There were 536 TKAs, of which 308/536 (57.5%) were in female patients. The mean age was 69.0 years (95% CI 45.0 to 88.0), the mean BMI was 32.2 kg/m2 (95% CI 18.9 to 50.2), and 387/536 (72.2%) survived to ten years. There were four revisions (0.7%): two deep infections (requiring debridement and implant retention), one aseptic loosening, and one haemosiderosis.Aims
Methods
To assess the cost-effectiveness of a two-layer compression bandage versus a standard wool and crepe bandage following total knee arthroplasty, using patient-level data from the Knee Replacement Bandage Study (KReBS). A cost-utility analysis was undertaken alongside KReBS, a pragmatic, two-arm, open label, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial, in terms of the cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Overall, 2,330 participants scheduled for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were randomized to either a two-layer compression bandage or a standard wool and crepe bandage. Costs were estimated over a 12-month period from the UK NHS perspective, and health outcomes were reported as QALYs based on participants’ EuroQol five-dimesion five-level questionnaire responses. Multiple imputation was used to deal with missing data and sensitivity analyses included a complete case analysis and testing of costing assumptions, with a secondary analysis exploring the inclusion of productivity losses.Aims
Methods
This study aims to identify the top unanswered research priorities in the field of knee surgery using consensus-based methodology. Initial research questions were generated using an online survey sent to all 680 members of the British Association for Surgery of the Knee (BASK). Duplicates were removed and a longlist was generated from this scoping exercise by a panel of 13 experts from across the UK who provided oversight of the process. A modified Delphi process was used to refine the questions and determine a final list. To rank the final list of questions, each question was scored between one (low importance) and ten (high importance) in order to produce the final list.Aims
Methods
This prospective study reports longitudinal, within-patient, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) over a 15-year period following cemented single radius total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Secondary aims included reporting PROMs trajectory, 15-year implant survival, and patient attrition from follow-up. From 2006 to 2007, 462 consecutive cemented cruciate-retaining Triathlon TKAs were implanted in 426 patients (mean age 69 years (21 to 89); 290 (62.7%) female). PROMs (12-item Short Form Survey (SF-12), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), and satisfaction) were assessed preoperatively and at one, five, ten, and 15 years. Kaplan-Meier survival and univariate analysis were performed.Aims
Methods
Aseptic loosening is the most common cause of failure following cemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and has been linked to poor cementation technique. We aimed to develop a consensus on the optimal technique for component cementation in TKA. A UK-based, three-round, online modified Delphi Expert Consensus Study was completed focusing on cementation technique in TKA. Experts were identified as having a minimum of five years’ consultant experience in the NHS and fulfilling any one of the following criteria: a ‘high volume’ knee arthroplasty practice (> 150 TKAs per annum) as identified from the National joint Registry of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man; a senior author of at least five peer reviewed articles related to TKA in the previous five years; a surgeon who is named trainer for a post-certificate of comletion of training fellowship in TKA.Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to identify variables associated with time to revision, demographic details associated with revision indication, and type of prosthesis employed, and to describe the survival of hinge knee arthroplasty (HKA) when used for first-time knee revision surgery and factors that were associated with re-revision. Patient demographic details, BMI, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, indication for revision, surgical approach, surgeon grade, implant type (fixed and rotating), time of revision from primary implantation, and re-revision if undertaken were obtained from the National Joint Registry data for England, Wales, Northern Ireland, and the Isle of Man over an 18-year period (2003 to 2021).Aims
Methods
Unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty (UKA and TKA) are successful treatments for osteoarthritis, but the solid metal implants disrupt the natural distribution of stress and strain which can lead to bone loss over time. This generates problems if the implant needs to be revised. This study investigates whether titanium lattice UKA and TKA implants can maintain natural load transfer in the proximal tibia. In a cadaveric model, UKA and TKA procedures were performed on eight fresh-frozen knee specimens, using conventional (solid) and titanium lattice tibial implants. Stress at the bone-implant interfaces were measured and compared to the native knee.Aims
Methods
Joint registries classify all further arthroplasty procedures to a knee with an existing partial arthroplasty as revision surgery, regardless of the actual procedure performed. Relatively minor procedures, including bearing exchanges, are classified in the same way as major operations requiring augments and stems. A new classification system is proposed to acknowledge and describe the detail of these procedures, which has implications for risk, recovery, and health economics. Classification categories were proposed by a surgical consensus group, then ranked by patients, according to perceived invasiveness and implications for recovery. In round one, 26 revision cases were classified by the consensus group. Results were tested for inter-rater reliability. In round two, four additional cases were added for clarity. Round three repeated the survey one month later, subject to inter- and intrarater reliability testing. In round four, five additional expert partial knee arthroplasty surgeons were asked to classify the 30 cases according to the proposed revision partial knee classification (RPKC) system.Aims
Methods
A pragmatic, single-centre, double-blind randomized clinical trial was conducted in a NHS teaching hospital to evaluate whether there is a difference in functional knee scores, quality-of-life outcome assessments, and complications at one-year after intervention between total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) in patients with severe isolated patellofemoral arthritis. This parallel, two-arm, superiority trial was powered at 80%, and involved 64 patients with severe isolated patellofemoral arthritis. The primary outcome measure was the functional section of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score at 12 months. Secondary outcomes were the full 24-item WOMAC, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), American Knee Society Score (AKSS), EuroQol five dimension (EQ-5D) quality-of-life score, the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Physical Activity Rating Scale, and complication rates collected at three, six, and 12 months. For longer-term follow-up, OKS, EQ-5D, and self-reported satisfaction score were collected at 24 and 60 months.Aims
Methods
The primary aim of this study was to assess whether patient satisfaction
one year after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) changed with longer
follow-up. The secondary aims were to identify predictors of satisfaction
at one year, persistence of patient dissatisfaction, and late onset
dissatisfaction in patients that were originally satisfied at one year. A retrospective cohort consisting of 1369 patients undergoing
a primary TKA for osteoarthritis that had not undergone revision
were identified from an established arthroplasty database. Patient
demographics, comorbidities, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities
Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores, and Short Form 12 (SF-12) questionnaire
scores were collected preoperatively, and one and five years postoperatively.
In addition, patient satisfaction was assessed at one and five years
postoperatively. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify
independent predictors of satisfaction at one and five years.Aims
Patients and Methods
Aims. The aim of this to study was to compare the previously unreported
long-term survival outcome of the Oxford medial unicompartmental
knee arthroplasty (UKA) performed by trainee
To compare the gait of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA)
and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients with healthy controls,
using a machine-learning approach. 145 participants (121 healthy controls, 12 patients with cruciate-retaining
TKA, and 12 with mobile-bearing medial UKA) were recruited. The
TKA and UKA patients were a minimum of 12 months post-operative,
and matched for pattern and severity of arthrosis, age, and body
mass index. Participants walked on an instrumented treadmill until their
maximum walking speed was reached. Temporospatial gait parameters,
and vertical ground reaction force data, were captured at each speed.
Oxford knee scores (OKS) were also collected. An ensemble of trees
algorithm was used to analyse the data: 27 gait variables were used
to train classification trees for each speed, with a binary output
prediction of whether these variables were derived from a UKA or
TKA patient. Healthy control gait data was then tested by the decision
trees at each speed and a final classification (UKA or TKA) reached
for each subject in a majority voting manner over all gait cycles
and speeds. Top walking speed was also recorded.Aims
Patients and Methods
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an established
and successful procedure. However, the design of prostheses continues
to be modified in an attempt to optimise the functional outcome
of the patient. The aim of this study was to determine if patient outcome after
TKA was influenced by the design of the prosthesis used. A total of 212 patients (mean age 69; 43 to 92; 131 female (62%),
81 male (32%)) were enrolled in a single centre double-blind trial
and randomised to receive either a Kinemax (group 1) or a Triathlon
(group 2) TKA. Patients were assessed pre-operatively, at six weeks, six months,
one year and three years after surgery. The outcome assessments
used were the Oxford Knee Score; range of movement; pain numerical
rating scales; lower limb power output; timed functional assessment
battery and a satisfaction survey. Data were assessed incorporating
change over all assessment time points, using repeated measures
analysis of variance longitudinal mixed models. Implant group 2
showed a significantly greater range of movement (p = 0.009), greater
lower limb power output (p = 0.026) and reduced report of ‘worst
daily pain’ (p = 0.003) over the three years of follow-up. Differences
in Oxford Knee Score (p = 0.09), report of ‘average daily pain’
(p = 0.57) and timed functional performance tasks (p = 0.23) did
not reach statistical significance. Satisfaction with outcome was
significantly better in group 2 (p = 0.001). These results suggest that patient outcome after TKA can be influenced
by the prosthesis used. Cite this article:
A small proportion of patients have persistent
pain after total knee replacement (TKR). The primary aim of this study
was to record the prevalence of pain after TKR at specific intervals
post-operatively and to ascertain the impact of neuropathic pain.
The secondary aim was to establish any predictive factors that could
be used to identify patients who were likely to have high levels
of pain or neuropathic pain after TKR. A total of 96 patients were included in the study. Their mean
age was 71 years (48 to 89); 54 (56%) were female. The mean follow-up
was 46 months (39 to 51). Pre-operative demographic details were
recorded including a Visual Analogue Score (VAS) for pain, the Hospital
Anxiety and Depression score as well as the painDETECT score for neuropathic
pain. Functional outcome was assessed using the Oxford Knee score. The mean pre-operative VAS was 5.8 (1 to 10); and it improved
significantly at all time periods post-operatively (p <
0.001):
(from 4.5 at day three to five (1 to 10), 3.2 at six weeks (0 to
9), 2.4 at three months (0 to 7), 2.0 at six months (0 to 9), 1.7
at nine months (0 to 9), 1.5 at one year (0 to 8) and 2.0 at mean
46 months (0 to 10)). There was a high correlation (r >
0.7; p <
0.001) between the mean VAS scores for pain and the mean painDETECT
scores at three months, one year and three years post-operatively.
There was no correlation between the pre-operative scores and any
post-operative scores at any time point. We report the prevalence of pain and neuropathic pain at various
intervals up to three years after TKR. Neuropathic pain is an underestimated
problem in patients with pain after TKR. It peaks at between six
weeks and three-months post-operatively. However, from these data
we were unable to predict which patients are most likely to be affected. Cite this article:
The aim of this study was to determine the association
between the Oxford knee score (OKS) and direct assessment of outcome,
and to examine how this relationship varied at different time-points
following total knee replacement (TKR). Prospective data consisting
of the OKS, numerical rating scales for ‘worst pain’ and ‘perceived
mean daily pain’, timed functional assessments (chair rising, stairs
and walking ability), goniometry and lower limb power were recorded
for 183 patients pre-operatively and at six, 26 and 52 weeks post-operatively.
The OKS was influenced primarily by the patient’s level of pain
rather than objective functional assessments. The relationship between report
of outcome and direct assessment changed over time: R2 =
35% pre-operatively, 44% at six weeks, 57% at 26 weeks and 62% at
52 weeks. The relationship between assessment of performance and report
of performance improved as the patient’s report of pain diminished,
suggesting that patients’ reporting of functional outcome after
TKR is influenced more by their pain level than their ability to
accomplish tasks.
To assess the effectiveness of a modified tibial tubercle osteotomy
as a treatment for arthroscopically diagnosed chondromalacia patellae. A total of 47 consecutive patients (51 knees) with arthroscopically
proven chondromalacia, who had failed conservative management, underwent
a modified Fulkerson tibial tubercle osteotomy. The mean age was
34.4 years (19.6 to 52.2). Pre-operatively, none of the patients
exhibited signs of patellar maltracking or instability in association
with their anterior knee pain. The minimum follow-up for the study
was five years (mean 72.6 months (62 to 118)), with only one patient
lost to follow-up.Objectives
Methods
As part of the national initiative to reduce
waiting times for joint replacement surgery in Wales, the Cardiff
and Vale NHS Trust referred 224 patients to the NHS Treatment Centre
in Weston-Super-Mare for total knee replacement (TKR). A total of
258 Kinemax TKRs were performed between November 2004 and August
2006. Of these, a total of 199 patients (232 TKRs, 90%) have been
followed up for five years. This cohort was compared with 258 consecutive
TKRs in 250 patients, performed at Cardiff and Vale Orthopaedic
Centre (CAVOC) over a similar time period. The five year cumulative
survival rate was 80.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 74.0 to 86.0)
in the Weston-Super-Mare cohort and 95.0% (95% CI 90.2 to 98.2)
in the CAVOC cohort with revision for any reason as the endpoint.
The relative risk for revision at Weston-Super-Mare compared with
CAVOC was 3.88 (p <
0.001). For implants surviving five years,
the mean Oxford knee scores (OKS) and mean EuroQol (EQ-5D) scores
were similar (OKS: Weston-Super-Mare 29 (2 to 47) The results show a higher revision rate for patients operated
at Weston-Super-Mare Treatment Centre, with a reduction in functional
outcome and quality of life after revision. This further confirms
that patients moved from one area to another for joint replacement
surgery fare poorly.
We report the general mortality rate after total
knee replacement and identify independent predictors of survival. We
studied 2428 patients: there were 1127 men (46%) and 1301 (54%)
women with a mean age of 69.3 years (28 to 94). Patients were allocated
a predicted life expectancy based on their age and gender. There were 223 deaths during the study period. This represented
an overall survivorship of 99% (95% confidence interval (CI) 98
to 99) at one year, 90% (95% CI 89 to 92) at five years, and 84%
(95% CI 82 to 86) at ten years. There was no difference in survival
by gender. A greater mortality rate was associated with increasing
age (p <
0.001), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA)
grade (p <
0.001), smoking (p <
0.001), body mass index (BMI)
<
20 kg/m2 (p <
0.001) and rheumatoid arthritis
(p <
0.001). Multivariate modelling confirmed the independent
effect of age, ASA grade, BMI, and rheumatoid disease on mortality.
Based on the predicted average mortality, 114 patients were predicted
to have died, whereas 217 actually died. This resulted in an overall
excess standardised mortality ratio of 1.90. Patient mortality after
TKR is predicted by their demographics: these could be used to assign
an individual mortality risk after surgery.
Up to 20% of patients are not satisfied with the outcome following total knee replacement (TKR). This study investigated the pre- and post-operative predictors of dissatisfaction in a large cohort of patients undergoing TKR. We assessed 1217 consecutive patients between 2006 and 2008 both before operation and six months after, using the Short-form (SF)-12 health questionnaire and the Oxford Knee Score. Detailed information concerning comorbidity was also gathered. Satisfaction was measured at one year when 18.6% (226 of 1217) of patients were unsure or dissatisfied with their replacement and 81.4% (911 of 1217) were satisfied or very satisfied. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of dissatisfaction. Significant (p <
0.001) predictors at one year included the pre-operative SF-12 mental component score, depression and pain in other joints, the six-month SF-12 score and poorer improvement in the pain element of the Oxford Knee Score. Patient expectations were highly correlated with satisfaction. Satisfaction following TKR is multifactorial. Managing the expectations and mental health of the patients may reduce dissatisfaction. However, the most significant predictor of dissatisfaction is a painful total knee replacement.
We aimed to determine the reliability, accuracy and the clinical role of digital templating in the pre-operative work-up for total knee replacement. Initially a sample of ten pre-operative digital radiographs were templated by four independent observers to determine the inter- and intra-observer reliability of the process. Digital templating was then performed on the radiographs of 40 consecutive patients undergoing total knee replacement by a
